Should Women Be Allowed On The Front Line

Women have been fighting alongside men on battlefields for centuries upon centuries, giving their greatest fight to lead their team to victory. Although women are given this opportunity, direct ground combat amongst women remains against the law till this very day, allowing a gender to define what a female can, or cannot do. The human race continues to evolve every day, yet a simple discriminatory law that decides what a woman’s capabilities are without being aware of just how empowering that specific woman is is the same as it first was. Despite the idea that women do not meet certain requirements in order to take place in combat units, women continue to provide an endless amount of support to men on battlefields, bringing a completely

Although women should be fighting in front line in the military many believe they should not. More than 200,000 position will still be remain exclusive to men. women won 't be able to qualify for jobs. “They are not going to be able to meet those standards” (Women in the Military: Why Can 't We Serve on the Front Lines). The weapon use in the front line are too dangerous. “women will not be able to handle the big

Feminists and women’s activist groups would have us believe that women are equal in strength, skill level, and in every form as men. Some women are attempting to get into the front lines of combat using lines such as: “it would increase the number of available soldiers”, “women can be as strong as men”, “there won 't be any

Over the years the United States has grown to love each other as the way people are, especially women. Women have proven to be even stronger than what people expected them to be. You can see the strength, the courage, and the confidence they have gained. It has been discussed many years that women shouldn’t be allowed in combat for not being “strong enough”. Men have shown that they can be “manly” enough to do women or girl things, so why can’t women do “manly” things? If women feel like they can handle being on the frontline then we should respect their decision and allow them to go.

The majority of my pro sources are in agreement with me that women should not go into combat and the con sources are not in disagreement they are just expressing another viewpoint, like should the government mandate the decision on women entering the infantry. Most of the authorities on this issue and authors believe that America will take a second look at this issue of women going into combat when our mothers and daughters are sent home in body bags and in pieces. It is worst enough to see your sons come home like that but your daughters are a whole different ball game.

Women are vital to the stability and efficiency of all branches of the United States armed forces. Although women’s presence may be necessary to the operation of the military, their placement in combat positions would prove to be a devastating mistake. The body of a woman is not made to brave combat positions, and placing women into positions dominated by men could create a hostile working environment. The atmosphere of battle is already heated, and placing more problems into the equation could lead to the unraveling of military effectiveness as the country knows it. Consequently, women should continued to be excluded from combat oriented positions in order to preserve the superb work of the United States armed forces.

In the article All Guts, No Glory it explains how women were not allowed to be classified as in combat soldiers regardless of what job was assigned. Generalizing women as delicate and almost as liabilities in the armed forces kept them in inferior ranks as well as having insufficient combat training. That not only endangered them but fallen male soldiers making it so women were unable to help bring them to safety. Sargent Rebekah brings up the point stating “From push-ups and drills of basic training

First of all, women are not as strong as men. The average twenty year old woman is as strong as the average fifty year old man. Also, the amount of women who have the same upper-body strength, stamina, and endurance as a well-developed man is shockingly small. In the military, the standards of fitness are made for men, so women are at greater risk of injury trying to reach them. Even

Women have been enlisted in the armed forces since June 12, 1948, when President Truman signed the Woman’s Armed Services Integration Act. Throughout this time, women have served several different roles; however, women were not allowed to serve in combat forces. Arguments offer the idea that women are physically and emotionally capable of performing the same as men, Researchers have proven that only a small percentage of women are capable of performing the physically demanding aspects as that of men, although there are a select few women that are capable of completing the qualification standards to join the combat forces. With that being said women should be allowed to fight on the front lines.

They argue that even though they can accomplish the same physical tasks like men, they are not naturally as strong as they lack the muscle strength that is required to serve in combat roles of the military. Muscle strength is necessary to carry the heavy weapons and in fighting the enemy. This therefore puts them at greater risk of injury and target by the enemy (Simons 451). In addition, they state that female are averagely shorter than their male counterparts and have less upper body strength that is essential for endurance in the military. Furthermore, they state that women have dense skeletal system that is prone to breakages.

The history of women in combat is somewhat controversial; and women have always seeked equality in combat and military forces (Women’s Actions). Women have been

The Pentagon’s decision to allow women to fight in the front lines is a major step in the equal rights between the two sexes because women are just as able to fight in the front lines just as men.

Society has built a stereotype that says women are inherently weaker than men. This has limited women’s chances to get ahead, but people are not standing idly by instead they are pushing for women to get equal opportunity. Some of these advancements are that women now have the right to vote, to own their property, and get jobs. However, not all jobs are available to women such as combat positions in the military. Combat positions or chances on the front line are unavailable to women because they are depicted as fragile and in need of protection. Women deserve the opportunity to try to gain their placement on the front line because women can be just as strong as men and they are willing to fight.

The proposition of women in the armed forces has quite frequently caused a great deal of controversy between many people. Some believe that women are too frail and weak to be in the armed forces, therefore, should not be allowed to enlist in the military. While others believe that women can actually handle themselves and be a benefit to our military, so they should have every right to enlist. I happen to be in the latter, to some extent that is. I strongly believe that women should be allowed to enlist, however, they should also be required to take and pass some effective form of a physical and mental test, that way you can trust that they are as fully prepared as they can be.

Being part of the front line combat refers to being part of the most advanced tactical combat units forming a military line. Women in Singapore should be allowed to fight in the front line. It is undeniable that it would require high physical strength that most women lack, but women can be trained to be just as capable as men, if not better, or assume front line positions requiring less physical strength. The generalised statement of women being weaker should not restrict them from taking up front line combat positions. Women in Singapore should be given an opportunity to fight in the front line. Women in Singapore should be allowed to fight in the front line because women are