Should Women Be Allowed To Serve In The Military Research

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

Thesis Statement: A few females are joining the military, and those taking leadership roles is even small, caused by existence of limited information about the Army and less combat roles, and this can be addressed by lifting ban on women on combat and creating more combat support jobs.

could not do the required amount, so the Marine Corps had to make a change. Conzachi states: The United States Marine Corps quietly announced recently on social media that the current requirement for female Marines to do a minimum of three (3) pull-ups as part of their training by January 1, 2014 has been delayed for another year. Currently, females are not required to do even a single pull-up, but rather a test called a “flexed-arm hang” in which they can score points based on the amount of time that they can hang from a pull-up bar absent any gear. A maximum score can be obtained if they hang for 70 seconds with their chin over the bar.

One of the largest posed arguments against women in combat is the fact women are not able to endure as much physically or mentally as men. The posed alternative position to this problem is to allow solely men to fight in combat, and leave other less-dueling tasks for women. Some methods to achieve this include the ban on transgenders, drafts, and stereotypical roles. Some also alternative methods include a mandatory draft and female-only combat units, which could, in fact, benefit women’s role in the military and combat in general. Similarly, the government has recently banned transgender individuals from the military and combat.

While ladies officers and enrolled workforce present with unique excellence in the U.S. Military, ladies have never been liable to Selective Service enlistment or a military draft in America. It is just established to enlist men for a draft, the Supreme Court administered on the grounds that the explanation behind enrollment is to make a pool of potential battle troops ought to a national crisis request a fast increment in the extent of the military. Ladies were prohibited from serving in front-line occupations, so there was no motivation to enlist them for conceivable enrollment into the military draft. Women have the capacity to play a big role in the military combat and selection process should not be based on gender but concrete values and personal abilities.

Countries across the globe have engaged in war since their very start; however, women have not been allowed full rights in combat; they have often been excluded or sheltered. Women formerly had little to no rights in war; however, over time they developed some rights (“History”). Since the 1940s, the combat exclusion policy has not allowed for women to take on front line combat or have the opportunity to gain certain leadership or ranked positions (

     Women have played a tremendous role in many countries' armed forces from the past to the present. Women have thoroughly integrated into the armed forces; all positions in the armed forces should be fully accessible to women who can compete with men intellectually and physically.

Since 1901, women have served in some form of the military, however, dating back to the American Revolution women have had an unofficial role. Women have had and will continue to have an important role in the military, the question is whether women should be allowed to occupy specific combat positions. Traditionally women have not been allowed in combat occupations, but recently these restrictions have been somewhat lifted, making certain occupations available to women. Despite the lift complications arise from women being in combat vocations and it’s not just because of the physical differences, there is also the increased risk of sexual assault. Due to the detrimental impact on the military, soldiers, and society, women should not

When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.

Women have been participating in the United States military since the Revolutionary War, where they were nurses, maids, cooks and even spies. They played vital roles in order to keep those fighting on the front lines healthier, and even a more important role in keeping commanding officers informed with private information stolen from the other side. Although the Revolutionary War took play in 1776, the first law to be passed that permanently stated that women have an official place in the military was in 1948, almost one hundred and seventy-two years later. Since that time there has been a lack of true growth when it comes to integration of females in the military. In 1994, a law was passed that tried to prohibit women from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level. Women are excluded from more then 25% of active combat roles within the military and only in 2013 was the ban lifted which was the final barrier to allowing women into all active roles. This has been a huge step in the direction for women being considered as being equal but there are still challenges that women face within the military. Ranging from sexual assault, discrimination, bullying, and other tactics, it is clear that for many, the military is still a “boys club.”

Women should be allowed to serve in the military because civil rights laws protect them from discrimination, they are just as capable as men, and should be free to exercise their right to fight for their country.

There are women that have proven to be physically, mentally, and more capable of leading and completing combat task operations. This opened the door for women to be placed in many position in the military. Nurse have paved the way and gave no reason for concern as to whether women are capable of helping military male doctors. Nurses have had a very hard time in the military because for a long time people was unsure of where they needed to be or should I say fit in. Many women serve in military camps as cooks, helper aids with permission from the commanding officers. Just like in many cultures nurse had to prove they were helpful or should I say needed. During last two years of World War I, women are allowed to join the military. 33,000 women

I realized that although in theory women in the armed forces seemed like a good idea, there are many obstacles that make that reality very difficult to achieve. In writing this paper I am not proposing that either position is more valid or right than the other. I only hope to present each side in an equal light to help others to understand the issues involved.

“We are all equal; it is not birth but virtue alone that makes the difference.” This insightful quote from the famous French philosopher and historian “Voltaire” seems to accurately represent the beliefs of the factions of American citizens pushing to allow women to fight in combat positions within the US Armed Forces. Though the topic has just recently been boosted into the media and congressional politics, it has been long debated. A rather current editorial from USA Today titled: “Open Combat Positions to Women” outlines the recent developments in the status of a much disputed and controversial issue facing the nation today. Though somewhat less in-depth than some opposing opinions, the

Women have fought alongside men in the United States Military in every major battle since the American Revolution. The roles of women in the military have evolved over time to allow the incorporation of women in expanding military career fields. Women have proven themselves to be an asset to the military despite some of society believing women would weaken America’s military effectiveness. Today more than 200,000 women are active-duty military, this is about 14.5% of all military. Currently, women are involved in all branches of the Armed Forces; there are around 74,000 women in the Army, 62,000 in the Air Force, 53,000 in the Navy, and 14,000 in the Marine Corps (By the numbers: Women in the U.S. Military). Military women continue to