Should World Leaders Keep Public Informed

On the date September 11, 2001, the world stood still and watched the horror of terrorism unfold in the heart and soul of the United States of America. For the world, this was just the beginning of the terrorist attacks that will take place. In my essay I will carefully evaluate the measures taken by Governments to stop the terror attacks from happening, through my paper I will discuss the United Nations (UN) and global counter-terrorism, summarising the facts on the 9/11 attacks, furthermore the connection between Muslims, United

The 9/11 terror attacks is one of the historical and fatal events that changed the United States of America forever, especially in relation to terrorists and terrorism. While these concepts were on the minds of very few people in America's population before the attacks, the 9/11 incident made terrorism to become one of the major concerns for the whole nation. This is despite of the fact that they were carried out in New York City, Washington, and parts of Pennsylvania. Since it was a major concern, the terror attacks dominated all kinds of media and contributed to increased security measures for average Americans. Moreover, terrorism currently provides a major threat to global security that any time in American and global history (Dyson, 2001, p.3). As a result, it has become a fundamental aspect for law enforcement agencies and their initiatives, particularly with the rapid technological advancements.

So far, terrorism has been a key obstacle to many foreign nations, as they are struggling to prevent terrorist attacks. From the year of 1997 up to the year of 2003, international terrorist attacks have gone from less than 500 to almost 3000. Overall, global terrorism has grown by almost 1200% from 1997 to 2003. (Johnston 1). This massive increase in terrorism reflects on other nations' lack of control of the safety of their nation. These statistics also show that something needs to be done to protect the

The terrorist attacks on September 11 changed America forever. The attacks led to President Bush creating the Department of Homeland Security which tried to centralize the federal response to all terrorist threats. However, local police, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians will still be the first to arrive at the scene of an attack. These first responders face a unique and increasingly dangerous task when reacting to a terrorist attack on US soil.

When the airplanes flew into the Twin Towers on 9/11 in New York, there was chaos and confusion throughout New York and the entire country. The events following the Boston Marathon Bombing were full of confusion and stress. However, in both events, first responders were there to aid in whatever way they were able. First responders, like those that responded to 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombing, rely heavily on proper communication to do their job properly. While communication has advanced in the past years, there are always more ways for communication amongst first responders to be advanced. Response efforts need to flow smoothly and efficiently, and communication aids greatly in those efforts. The events following a terrorist attack,

Timely and accurate information is essential during a terrorist attack and a natural disaster. Therefore, the government must inform the public of all events. However, officials need to be mindful of the information that is released could expose intelligence in an ongoing investigation and put lives at risk. Crisis communication is a fine line of keeping the public informed and placing them harms

As the Twin Towers crumbled, a day in history was being marked, and it was later said the world would never be the same as it was before the terror attacks of 9/11. The attack was not only a wake up call to the people of America, but all of the Western countries and the allies of the United States. The September 11 attacks changed people’s views on security in their own countries. It unleashed a great outbreak of panic in both America and Europe, which forced the government leaders to take action in order to protect their people and prevent similar attacks from happening in the future. Many countries, standing side by side with USA, proposed anti-terrorism policies and restricted immigration from the Middle East to show the unity. In this essay

Make the case for retaining an all-hazards approach to emergency management that includes terrorism and its associated hazards as one of many hazards. Discuss the pros and cons of such an approach as it relates to all four phases of emergency management: Mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery An all all-hazards approach provides a basic framework for responding to a wide variety of hazards, it does not mean literally being prepared for everything.

Terrorism has also opened up a whole new level of threat after jihad has been able to be completed through media and internet/cyber means. The Internet and the media have only made it simpler for terrorists groups such as the Taliban, al Qaeda, ISIS, Osama bin Laden followers, and so on, to achieve their goals and cause a reign of terror all throughout the world. Thus, that is why it is so critical for everyone, especially those from government background, to be aware of the threats these groups can pose and be prepared in the case that there is an attack. If every single defense department is prepared, informed, and determined to fight against terrorists, there could definitely be a possible resolution to this worldwide evolving

Terrorist events are surprise attacks involving the use of violence to harm purposely civilians to gain political or religious power, or to instill fear in a population. Based on a variety of reports on terrorist events, the response to most terrorist events can include civil disorders, public disruption, and devastation to infrastructure as well as the death of citizens. Devastation can depend on how well the area is trained in dealing with disasters and the type of terrorist event that is carried out. This essay will talk about using the current response of an area with little duty principle equipped with a non-permanent crisis supervision principal to address any terrorist events that occur.

Following the tragic terrorist attack in San Bernardino, Obama addresses the nation regarding the war on terrorism. As a result, he presents a clear understanding of the United States’ intentions towards terrorism. Obama instructs the United States, concerning the San Bernardino attack, on how the War of terrorism can be halted. Obama’s address to the nation is delivered with the desire to create security. In the midst of our country grieving for our losses, his speech reassures the deaths of San Bernardino will not be without consequence. America will strive to draw, “upon every aspect of American power,” in order impede terrorism.

The government of the United States has no greater concern than protecting her people, both when at home and at abroad (Harvey, 2012). Thus, being prepared to combat terrorism is of critical importance, not only because of the often severe consequences of the attacks in terms of loss of life for innocent Americans and property damage, but equally because of the destruction which the attacks or threats can cause to the independence and the legal order (Franco & Sell, 2010). When a politician,

President Obama claims that, “America has been at war with terrorists, since al Qaeda killed nearly three thousand Americans on 9/11” in “The Address to the Nation on Terrorism” given on December 6, 2015. Shortly before this speech, fourteen Americans were brutally killed in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino. President Obama addresses the nation to describe the effects of terrorism and argue that if American allies work together, terrorism can be beaten. Obama supports his argument with the use of pathos, lists, and diction. The authors purpose is to propose a plan to defeat terrorism. The author writes in an inspiring tone for fellow Americans, American allies and terrorist leaders.

In politics you will not be told the 100% truth. Presidents should be truthful but sometimes things are better left unsaid. If a leader is smart then they will know what their country wants to hear. If the leader feels

Terrorist attacks greatly harms the country socially, economically, culturally. These events bring people of our great country to question their safety, which causes them to become less productive. When our beloved citizens question their safety, the necessary feeling of unity begins to erode. So, as a nation, we need to call every man, women, and child to be on alert for any suspicious activity. By mobilizing the masses, the government would create an anti terrorist group that would cover every hidden street and dark alley.