Should we drill for oil in Alaska's wilderness? Essays

Drilling in Alaska will not help stop the oil crisis. Many colonial Americans weren’t concerned about protecting natural resources because they thought they had a lot but they also knew that they needed to preserve the oil. Should the United States drill for oil in Alaska’s wilderness? America shouldn’t drill in Alaska because of the environment wilderness, protecting environment, and economics.

The arctic is facing a crisis where seismic blasting for oil is disrupting and destroying the natural habitats of sea mammals, as well as, depriving aboriginal citizens of their natural food source, which they are dependant upon; fish. The blasting can kill the marine life as it occurs every ten seconds every single day for long periods of time, therefore many aboriginal fishermen within this regions are frightened by the effects of the blasting. Since it can be proven fatal to fish, the main concern is the blasting will eradicate and destroy the sea life and leave many aboriginal families starving. We plan to create a bill which will protect this natural resource from the harm of seismic blasting and ban all activities regarding the blasting or searching of any resource in the arctic while disrupting another.

Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a very controversial topic. On one end you have the people who want to drill for oil to help out our economy, and on the other end there are the environmentalists and the Alaskan natives who do not want their land destroyed. Our economy needs help; oil prices keep rising, gas prices have reached an all time high, and America is depending too much on foreign trade. Drilling for oil in Alaska will solve these problems. There are ways of drilling without disturbing the environment and keeping the animals in their original habitat.

In his foreword, President Jimmy Carter proposes his thoughts on oil drilling in the Arctic Refuge. He contends that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for the oil industry. He believes in the preservation of wildlife and the natural beauty that it provides. His argument is solidly structured by a personal anecdote, historical evidence of actions taken towards preservation, and a refutation to advocates of the drilling activity.

America should drill in Alaska for oil because it's good for the economy. Document C says the United States uses more oil than it could find domestically, even if we were to drill on all public lands. The United States uses 25% to 30% of the oil produced

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not only America’s last “truly great wilderness”, but it is home to a multitude of species that would be affected if it were transformed into a place for an oil industry. It is also a symbol of our national heritage where settlers once called it the wilderness. Throughout the essay, Jimmy Carter gives thorough evidence on why we should not destroy this beautiful environment. His evidence includes descriptive language, the use of pathos, and logical reasoning.

In May 2006 225 - 201 allowed drilling in ANWR, yet the bill died in the Senate and drilling was not allowed. Which brings us to the question … Should the United States drill for oil in Alaska’s wilderness? The United States should not drill in Alaska’s wilderness because the animals could become endangered and even extinct. Drilling in Alaska’s wilderness could affect the organisms in a rough manner.

Summary Alaska is well known for its abundance in oil. Obama has now proposed a bill to ban energy exploration on 12 million acres of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. With this bill comes this are being considered as wilderness and Alaskans are not happy with the bill at all. Many of the people who are Native to this are feel as if they have been disrespected or unconsidered.

Therefore America is debating whether or not they should drill in the Alaska wilderness. The wild animals come to the refuge to have space and freedom and to be protected from us!the fate of these animals is in our hands. Do you want to be held responsible! Drill a hand tool or power machine use to make holes which are going to be used in the Alaska wilderness. Wilderness is an uninhabited

In this set of materials, the reading passage describes the harmful effects of drilling oil in Alaska. In the lecture the professor’s view on this issue is therefore different from the one expressed in the reading. According to the reading, drilling in Alaska affects ecosystem of the area and livelihood of the people who live there negatively. However, the professor casts doubt on this view with several points.

Calf survival rates have been extremely low in areas or mountain range and without their discrete areas caribous are threaten more by predators (Whitten 2004). The reserves will also constrain caribou from moving about because of all the traffic that would be created and the pipe crossings. That’s no way a precious creature should live. That’s why Alaskan natives oppose drilling.

A solution according to the article “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,” suggests that in January of 2015 Fish and Wildlife Service released a CCP the long-term plan guides all aspects of management. Defenders of wildlife and the refuge applaud Trump’s recommendation and call upon them to take to Congress. After going through Congress assuming they allow it a petition would then go through the people’s hands (“Arctic National Wildlife Refuge”). According to “Help Stop Plans to Drill in the Arctic Refuge” there is a website made especially to voice opinions on oil drilling in this special refuge, on this site anyone can send a letter to Congress stating their feelings on the matter. As well as once it’s gone through congress it will be open to the public eye and more than likely have several petitions against it, as well as internet explosions and opinions on this important matter.

America Should Reject the Oil Businesses Plan and Permanently Protect The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

After decades of rancorous debate marked by legislative impasse, public protest, and mounting political pressure, the issue of opening the last of Alaska's pristine frontiers for oil drilling exploration appears may finally be moving towards a long-sought resolution. At the heart of this over thirty-year old conflict, waged bitterly between environmental activists and major petroleum producers, is a parcel of land containing nearly 20 million acres of untouched environmental resources known as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). While the ecological importance of the ANWR region is largely undisputed, as the preserve contains critical den grounds for the arctic's large mammals, including polar bears, caribou, and walruses, America's current economic crisis has intensified calls to tap ANWR for the millions of barrels of petroleum believed to be buried beneath its frozen soil. As a member of several environmental activist organizations, my firm belief that drilling for oil in ANWR would be disastrous in terms of biodiversity has motivated a search for alternative methods of message delivery, because while preserving the glory of nature's bounty is my overriding objective, this passion is not shared by the business executives, laborers, and investors who hold a vested interest in oil production. Rather than simply cling fiercely to the moral appeal of ecological conservation, I have strived to examine the issue of drilling for oil in ANWR through an objective lens,

Would you really want to be responsible for destroying the animals home and the environment? The United States has a huge debate whether or not We should drill for oil in Alaska’s wilderness. But the answer seems pretty clear to me because it is not essential for our economy ,it is not valuable for the environment, and it is causing a social disruption. In the background essay, it says that many colonies We're not concerned about protecting our natural resources because they thought they had enough natural resources to last forever; But We don't, We are limited and some day in the not too distant future we may run out of natural resources so we have to circumspect and start protecting it by using other materials such