Shylock in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice

Throughout the education system, there seems to be an unofficial consensus that pieces of literature that are deemed “controversial” should not be taught in school. The Merchant of Venice falls into this category due to the Anti-Semitism which exists within the play making it “controversial” therefore, banned. On the contrary, this play should not be considered controversial and it should not be banned due to the learning experiences and knowledge that can be gained by reading this play. The contrastive style of literature will provide students and teachers alike who read this play the chance to expand their horizons when it comes to their English skills. With this in mind, The Merchant of Venice written by William

Antonio’s money is all tied up with a number of trade ships and tells Bassanio that he will be the loans guarantor. Shylock, a Jewish moneylender, offers to lend Bassanio three thousand ducats with no interest. Shylock creates a contract stating that should the loan go unpaid, Shylock will be entitled to a pound of Antonio’s own flesh. Antonios ships are lost and the debt cannot be paid. A trial is called to collect the debt and Shylock ignores all pleas to Antonio’s life. Shylock responds by reasoning that he has no reason. He blames his hatred of Antonio on “affection, Mistress of passion,” who is known to affect men and their moods in unexplainable ways (4.1.49–50). When the Duke of Venice is called in as the judge, he seeks a legal advisor. Portia being disguised as a young law clerk, examines the contract and, declares that Shylock is entitled to the merchant’s flesh, but that he must do so without causing Antonio to bleed. Making Shylocks distain towards Antonio even more apparent. This turn in the trial causes Shylock to accept Bassanio’s money and turns into a trial against Shylock for conspiring against the life of a Venetian citizen, stripping Shylock of everything he holds

He questioned why God would abandon his people and where He was in all this chaos? (pg 65). He asked himself why he should bless God? Why God, the all powerful, the omnipotent, kept himself silent? And why he would thank God?

“Highway to Hell” by ACDC closely relates to the plot in Act I of Macbeth. Leading her husband down a dark path, Lady Macbeth persuades Macbeth to kill King Duncan in order to seize power. Once Macbeth is visited by the witches, and receives the title, Thane of Cawdor, he begins to think of murdering King Duncan. When King Duncan comes to visit his castle “the raven himself is hoarse that croaks the fatal entrance of Duncan under my battlements”soon after he plans to kill the king that very night (I. VI. 38-39). During dinner Macbeth thinks better of his plan and decides not to kill the king, and therefore place himself against heaven. Lady Macbeth notices this and entices him by explaining her plan. After hearing her plan Macbeth decides that he should go for it, “No stop signs, speed limit, Nobody's gonna slow me down,” and kill the king (ACDC). Macbeth fully embraces his wife’s plan to frame the guards for murder; in doing so Macbeth is not only committing regicide, but ruining two innocent men’s lives by framing them for the deed.

as I was with Moses, so I will be with thee; I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee (Josh.

“Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all my

Shylock is a character famously known as being the antagonist of Shakespeare’s play merchant of Venice. In this play, Shakespeare portrayal of Shylock the moneylender is one of anti-Semitic stereotype. Shylock is depicted as a typical bloodthirsty Jew who lives a life void of any depth or meaning. His sole purpose for living seems to be to amass wealth and vengeance as seen from his adamant claim for his “pound of flesh”. Despite Shakespeare’s attempts to humanize Shylock at points in the story, it appears that his primary focus is to steer the audience against Shylock, painting him as being a cruel, bitter and inaffable figure. It is clear that in both Shakespeare’s merchant of Venice and Grace Tiffany’s Turquoise Ring, Shylock exposes

“I swear fidelity to the Jewish army, and obedience to its leaders, may my people live again may Eretz-Israel be reborn”

In a book or play, it is usually very easy to distinguish who the victim is and who the villain is. The villain usually causes all the problems in the story line and the victim is the one who suffers in result of the villain’s actions. In the play The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare, we examine the life of Shylock as a victim. It is seen through three main events in the play. Shylock is ridiculed by his community and his family, he is betrayed by his daughter and the community he lives in, and he is forced to lose all his wealth.

Hamlet believes that his life now revolves around a life of madness, blood, and having his revenge any way he can get it, he is willing to give any life but a chosen few that between him and the death of his horrible stepfather he believes that without the death of the King nothing will ever be good for just again in the state of Denmark. That the corruption, decay, and disease will continue to spread. He will not only lose the honor of his family but the respect from himself. In Act II, Hamlet comes to the decision that he has no other choice than to kill Claudius, at that point he still thinks he can save so many from his uncle's deceit. “ O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I! Is it not monstrous that this player here, But in a fiction,

In William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, Shylock is instantly portrayed as a villain. Shylock, while making a deal, crucially demands a pound of Antonio’s flesh as interest. It is revealed that Shylock’s villainous behavior stems from a history of constant torment from characters in the play. In The Merchant of Venice, Shylock is a villain who acts out of revenge when he wants pay back for all the pain he endured. Evidently, Shakespeare created the character Shylock with a sympathetic past in order to have the audience question Shylock’s true nature.

In the play the ‘Merchant of Venice’ by William Shakespeare the antagonist Shylock is both the victim and the villain. Shylock is a Jewish moneylender and is initially portrayed as anger filled and bloodthirsty but as the play continues we begin to see him as more human and his emotions become more evident. As the antagonist, Shylock is a fearful adversary to Antonio, the protagonist. But as good begins to win over evil, Shylock is crushed and we see evidence of his mortality in his grief. Shylock changes significantly though out the course of the play and he is formed into a too complex character to be labeled just victim or villain.

did this through Shylock. In Act 3 Scene 3, Shylock tells of how he is

Disguised as young lawyer Balthazar, who speaks with heightened eloquence to beg Shylock to show mercy. Portia’s speech about the quality of mercy is wasted to Shylock. It's almost as if Shylock got his way, revenge. After all these years it is time for him to complete his deed. His deed to eliminate Antonio. As his moment arrives it is all dismantled by the intelligence of Portia. Portia turns Shylock’s greatest weapon-the law-against him, Portia delivers once last chance of mercy to Shylock. Shylock is warned if even a drop of blood is spilled he will be accused of conspiring a life against another Venetian citizen all of his land and goods will be confiscated by the state. Shylock agrees to take thrice the sum. Shylock drops the case, but Portia deems him guilty for threatening another Venetian citizen. Half his property and land shall go to Antonio and the other half to the state. “I pardon thee thy life before thou ask it.” The Duke of Venice demonstrates mercy even after what the Jew had committed. The court could have acted on revenge against Shylock but they knew mercy was far greater than revenge. Shakespeare urges mercy is preferable than revenge. He tells us that even those who have wronged deserve mercy. Acting towards revenge will not prosper but mercy can be replenishing. Shakespeare shows us one can show mercy and that it is not forced.

One loses many opportunities every time they hesitate to act. Whether it be unintentional or not, it all depends on the subject in question. In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Hamlet Prince of Denmark, the character Hamlet shows qualities that are evident in his soliloquies. Since the beginning, Hamlet is unable to control his emotions towards Gertrude and Ophelia. He tends to overthink, generating doubt around life and death. Though impossible and inconvenient at times, Hamlet strives for an idealistic approach, such as justification for killing Claudius. Hamlet’s complex personality and unpredictable nature delay the commitment he makes to avenge his father.