Side Arm Weapons

In addition, the general audiences of this article are the women society. In the article, the author mainly explains several reasons and describes her dangerous personal experiences why she made the decision to carry a gun and how it makes the author feel safe with it. She wrote the article to those women that who has or has not had experience of sexual assault; or for those women who are not able to protect themselves from either dangers or crimes. In paragraph 3, the author used an idea about “just because I am a female, I have to be extra careful” to introduce her decision about carrying a pistol as a woman. Also, the purpose of this article is to explain why the author made the decision to own a gun and the necessity of carrying a gun as a woman. In paragraph 14, the

"The right to bear arms" is what grants people freedom as they are able to defend themselves from any life threatening dangers. However, this amendment has not been exercised correctly in the U.S which makes it one of the most dangerous amendment as well. But, this amendment still plays a crucial role in people 's daily lives as they can protect themselves if there is any harm to their lives. Thus, it is important for this amendment to be reinforced even more to where owning guns is actually safe.

Light machine guns and sub-machine guns were invented during World War I as small arms, but the larger machine guns were modernized as well. Flame throwers were used as an offensive attack against trench warfare.[ix],[x]

The author states why it is a good idea to carry a knife, we would have to be physically fit with good aim or skills if we were to carry a knife, But fighting against someone with a gun while the person has a knife the gun wins so it wouldn’t be able to protect the person. We would

Considering the stable condition of the US military and the homeland security systems, the country has the most advanced security system that assures citizens of their safety. Regardless, there exists no need for such extreme measures such as civilians being in possession of assault rifles as a strategy to self-defense. If necessary, cases of self-defense on the part of civilians are well handled by ownership of merely concealed pistols that from records are efficient in subduing any intruder while waiting for law enforcement back up. From self-defense and securing property, civilians’ reluctance to support the gun laws on such high caliber weapons has been underwhelming. Their standpoint has been in possession of such assault weapons. The same standpoints have been the cause for such raging debates on the support or disregard of the government proposition to have the assault guns banned from civilians possession (Miller 533).

(Lott 12) in the United States there are 80,000 to 82,000 defensive uses of guns during assaults, robberies and household burglaries. Out of the 1,000,000 times guns are used for defensive reasons in the world 400,000 of theses cases have saved lives or prevented lives from being taken. (Lott 2) The use of guns by law-abiding citizens may create a positive externality for others. Therefore, when a person is going to commit a unlawful act on someone they might be reluctant because they have no way of telling if they are carrying a weapon or not. Our country is very restrictive when granting the public to own or carry guns. Therefore, our government came up with the "Shall Issue" law, which prevents anyone to own, or posses guns that have a record of criminal injustices or a record of mental illness.

“Without knowing the use of them and defenseless; whereas to preserve liberty, it is essential that the body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, espectially when young, how to use them…” (Document 8 Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer) Richard Lee is stating here, that it is essential that the people are allowed to bear and keep arms. He believes if you do not have arms, you will not be able to use them. If you do not use arms, you are left defenseless. In order to preserve the liberty of our states, the people need to be educated on how to properly use arms, so they can provide themselves a sense of self-defense.

The purpose of the archetype of weapons in this text is to demonstrate that no weapon is useful unless one is skillful in its use. Near the beginning of the novel, Red Harmon, a seemingly normal air force veteran is confronted by three muggers. An incident occurs, and afterwards the local detective, Carter, narrates the security footage: “Harmon pushed it [a pistol] away,... and took aim at the last one sprinting away… He was at full speed when Harmon shot twice with his left hand. The gangster fell... ‘Three seconds!’ Carter said. ‘You killed two people, almost three, without a weapon of your own’”(McCaleb 6). This quotation indicates that Red is very competent in combat situations. The author says that ‘Harmon shot twice with his left hand,’ Thus

In Suzanna hupps essay “My Gun Was 100 Yards Away Completely useless” she argues how carrying a gun could be a big need at any moment Hupp starts off by telling us how she wouldn't carry a gun but then started using it illegally to use as protection after the situation she went through while she was with her parents at a local cafeteria and an unknown person goes in to shoot that's when she regrets not having her gun with her.

(James Lindgren) already had written in his journal about the topic on gun violence in the America, the title was Forward “The Past and Future of guns”. That surrounds the controversial issues on the constitution based on the second amendment right. James Lindgren also synthesizes with the idea of supporting the right to bear arm as long the individual is not a danger to the public health. What Mr. Lindgren mean by not a danger to public health? He had to explain his position on the constitution right to bear arm was mentioned in the framework of the constitution documents well-regulated militia support from your local State, or the Federal government just like the minute man during

A standout amongst the most warmed and talked-about about issues in this day and age is that of weapon control. In recent past years, there’ve been many cases reported in light of gun use. Since then there are debates going on either there should be gun control bills. There have been high quantities of passing’s including guns in the United States, and individuals are starting to stand firm against the savagery and search for approaches to take care of the issues. Firearm control is exacting stricter and more brutal directions on owning and conveying guns, which numerous individuals accept is the answer. In any case, arguers trust that the privilege to have firearms is a piece of each American 's sacred rights. Gun laws are the reason for much rough wrongdoing in America, and they should be changed to make it less demanding for Americans to buy handguns, convey them as hid weapons, and better protect themselves.

Many Americans tend to be on opposing sides when dealing with such a controversial issue such as gun control. A more specific category of such a broad topic as gun control is the practice that some Americans participate in, called concealed carry. Concealed carry is the practice of carrying a weapon, typically a handgun, on one’s body that is hidden from the public. This political issue hits many different institutions within America, such as many special interest groups, the constitution and Judicial branch of the government, and also the principle of Federalism.

relation to modern times, there is no justifiable reason to possess arms; we do not face dangers such as

Some critics tend to argue that enforcing stricter laws such as on hand guns is a violation of their right to bear arms. Individuals feel stripped of their protection and claim to be left defenseless against attackers. What society tends not to realize is that, because of their possession if these handguns, a lot of innocent loves are put in danger. Bakal et al research puts aside a whole discussion where family members shot each other because of these easily accessed guns. Mothers killing their children and themselves over trivial arguments, where the situation could have been handled

There is a lot of controversy about baring arms. The finding in 20/20 is an example of the great controversy on guns. As shown in the mainstream on the media, many reports have shown the pros and cons about baring arms. In the 20/20 video, it shows many examples in which people have protected themselves from harm. One of the point made in the video that caught my attention was "The first line of defense is you". I agree with what he said because it makes sense to want to protect oneself from harm. If one can have a gun to protect oneself they should be able to have one. Myths about crimes are a waste of time because they don't really get down to business. For instance, on page 22 it states, "The accused might be required to walk barefoot