Sigmund Freud's Pychodynamic Approach To Leadership

He advances the idea that modern organizational superiors seek a sense of their own mortality through manipulation of people and objects at the expense of their subordinates. Slavery, he asserts, is the state of being a mere instrument, and the organization can reduce man to the stature of a thing. Instead of constructing human relationships on the outworn patterns of labor and authority he advances the alternative: leadership based on deriving meaning, action and continuity in our work in complex organizations. He suggests that leadership should not be seen as merely a position someone holds but rather as a dynamic that occurs within a group or organization. He suggests that the face-to-face encounter is the essence of freedom and it is also the primary unit of analysis in self-discoveries. This new definition of leadership has three essential functions: (1) to help the group or organization understand its needs and potential (2) integrate and articulate the group’s vision and (3) act as a "trigger" or stimulus for group action. When viewed developmentally, this form of leadership can be enabling and fulfilling in Denhardt's estimation. However, this places a very high value on communication skills and tilts again toward Freud: what we feel and why. Denhardt further advocates the notion that leadership should be distributed throughout society because leadership's essence is to create an energizing effect. The necessary

Leadership is a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the achievement of a goal. The article “Leadership That Gets Results” by Daniel Goleman is an article that helps readers understand that there is not only one way of becoming a successful leader. Research indicates that leaders with best results do not rely on only one leadership style. Goleman, describes leaderships styles as array of clubs in a golf pro’s bag. Over the course of the game, the pro picks clubs based on the demands of the shot. Thinking is involved during the selection, but usually it is automatic. The pro is aware of the challenge ahead, quickly utilizes the right tool, and puts it to work. It has also been found that emotional intelligence

Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.

In addition, leadership itself can be described in various forms and through the highlight of different skill sets, but the one thing that all definitions have in common is that “leadership involves influencing the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and feelings of other people” Spector’s work (as cited in Curtis, de Vries, & Sheerin, 2011, p.306). When the skill set of a leader is compared to that of a manager, true differences are noted. Some of these key differences are apparent even in the approach utilized to reach the desired goals. While a manager directs, a leader transforms, a manager sustains and a leader improves, a manager controls, a leader motivates, a manager’s focus is on short-term goals and a leader’s is long-term based, managers ask how and when, while

Thus, we can define leadership as a coaching model, or a framework to use as an underlying structure to build teamwork, confidence, improve performance and behavior, and in most any aspect (business, education, sports, etc.) utilize these theories as a way to actualize goals. Because humans are so unique and individualized, there are a number of theories from which to draw from and most agree that the integration of a multidisciplinary approach and field of knowledge is what allows one to become both more tactical and strategic.

This is why, Organizational renowned scholars have been studying of this very significant topic of leadership for literally hundreds of years. Because. It is very complex, not simple one.

The role of leadership is an important position within an organization or group, since this position may influence an environment, both, the individual, and the climate. In the event of concentrating on how influential leadership may be, some leaders have transformed the views or perspectives of individuals within a society. Therefore, it’s possible for leadership traits to motivate, persuade, or stimulate visions, rather they are appropriate or unethical.

The most responsible person in this reading was Professor Freud, as a professor you deal with 300 students or more. That being said, if a teacher gives you a deadline, as an adult it’s your responsibility to make sure you get that paper there on time with no hesitation. Professor Freud is only trying to get you ready for the real world and when something needs to be done, it should be done on time. Although Mary the Secretary should have gotten her facts straight and asked Professor Freud herself what his policy was on late work, she tried giving an honest opinion on what she thought he would say which is “it’s not a big deal, 15 minutes late isn’t bad” while in reality, 15 minutes was late enough to be considered a zero. She tried giving

One of the most profound intellectuals in the field of psychology is Sigmund Freud. Though many may have never even heard his name, he is a well-respected and studied asset to modern day psychology history and teachings. Sigmund Freud, born on May 6th 1856 in Freiberg, Austria, was a prominent neurologist and psychiatrist. Born into a Jewish family originally from Bohemia, then forced to flee to Vienna, Freud showed his intelligence and thirst for knowledge at an early age reading Shakespeare at as young as eight years old. Being the curious mind and character he was, he shared his time within several different subjects that intrigued him. Some of these subjects include law, philosophy and particularly the field of medicine. After finishing high school at the age of 17, he decided to further his education in medicine, with a focus on the nervous system, and inevitably achieved his medical degree in 1881.

The psychodynamic leadership theory asserts that the first experience of leadership started on the day he or she was born. The rationale of the theory has it roots in the development of psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud. The approach suggests leaders can become more efficient once they understand their own psychological makeup. It evaluates the psychological makeup of an individual by determining what motivates his or her reactions and responses to situations of people around them. The main intention of the approach applies to the enhancement of the overall situation the leader learns as well as their team members. Providing more awareness of the personality characteristics of team members, resulting in a better understanding

Sigmund Freud played a key role in the development of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapy. The theory of personality development is primarily based on the first six years of life because those times are the most significant in the psychological development of personality. The psychoanalytic theory focuses on the three different levels of awareness such as the preconscious, the conscious, and the unconscious mind and how they all motivate our behavior (Tan, n.d.)

Chapter two focuses on the role of emotions in leadership and the influence that comes through understanding and managing the emotions of the leadership and the organization. First, Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee identify the capacity to serve as an emotional guide by instilling confidence in the face of difficulties or upregulating the attitude of an organization as the original indicator of leadership (2008, p. 18). These primal leadership skills impacted the limbic system, the portion of the brain that controls emotions, behaviors, and motivations (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2008, p. 19). Scientist discovered the power of these primal influence stems from the fact that the human limbic system is open to outside influences,

There has been vast amounts of research done on the topic of leadership, and yet despite this it continues to be ‘‘riddled with paradoxes, inconsistencies, and contradictions’’

This paper will highlight the world's leading psychologist's thinking and research towards leadership who examined leadership as the psychological process (Bligh and Meindl, 2005) .This paper will cover the diversity of topics covered in this field including; psychological concept of leadership; major key psychological theories underpinning leadership behavior, power and influences; cognitive process that categorize individuals as leaders and

The concept of leadership has been widely discussed by academics worldwide and comprehensively defined in dictionaries and encyclopedias with multiple definitions and contexts. Scholars may study leadership from various perspectives, from a managerial standpoint, an in-depth philosophical analysis of the concept and even from the psychological aspect of the discipline. Since a very young age, I’ve had the opportunity to learn and being inspired by multiple leaders, who provided me with a solid foundation to understand their influence for change, to become successful, to defend an ideal or to simply guide others to work together to accomplish organizational goals. Employees can contribute with unique skills to reach the objectives of an organization. But, innate leaders become the legitimate agents of transformational change whenever is needed to motivate their subordinates and to maximize the outcomes of the organization they represent.