Silo Mentality Case Study

1. System Thinking: System thinking is nothing but instead of focusing on only one particular issue, we have to analyze and try to understand the entire system on the whole. With this kind of analyzation, we can easily find a solution to the problem as the problems are not confined to only a particular area or time. We might find a solution for a particular issue, somewhere in the whole system by analyzing the entire system completely. We should try to relate the actions and the consequences on the whole as the issues occur at different time levels, not confined to only one particular time level. We have to have knowledge of the relation between different departments of an organization and the relation between them and the functionality between the departments as to how they are related in an organization. We generally focus on only one particular issue rather than seeing the bug picture and that shouldn’t be done. In system thinking we analyze the big picture.

With today’s fast moving pace there are many challenges we face that demands more non-linear system thinking instead of cause and effect linear thinking. In The Fifth Discipline, Peter Senge stated, “system thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes,” rather than reacting to a specific part or event. System thinking involves shifting from the linear to non-linear thinking and/or the rational to the intuitive or thin-slicing type decisions. System thinking is

In order for any organization to be successful, they must find effective ways to change systems and policies that are ineffective in creating a successful environment. A system consists of four things, elements, attributes, internal relationships, and the system environment. The systems theory is transdisciplinary study of the abstract organization of phenomena, independent of their substance, type, or spatial or temporal scale of existence (Heylighen & Joslyn, 1992). The study investigates all the principals common to all complex bodies, and the models which can be used to describe them. Von Bertalanffy (1971) was the creator of the “system” concept, he developed this idea as an answer to the limitations of individual disciplines in addressing complex social issues (Mitchell, 2005). The underlining principal of this theory is that an organization consists of multiple, interdependent parts that collectively form more than the sum of their parts. Developed from the systems theory, are three separate theories with the basis of each being the systems theory. The activity theory considers the entire program versus just one single sector, it sees the operation as a whole instead of sub departments, it combines both micro and macro elements of the organization. The chaos theory does not mean a chaotic hectic situation, rather a situation where there appears to be little to no order, there really is a hidden underlying order. The complexity theory is

I agree with you hospitals and other healthcare facilities are like any other organization and need to management team who have strong strategic planning skills. Dynamic nature of healthcare system where new innovations are highly desirable, encourage dynamic strategic thinking and healthcare managers need to assemble strategies which can be adjusted as per changing market landscape. In doing so the healthcare managers initiate strategic planning process which focus on relevant and lasting transformations for the future and integrates the organization’s short, medium and long term objectives. As you mentioned, that a heath care facility may fail because of its failure to think strategically while and adapt to latest technologies.

A system can be defined as several interconnected components working together that permit the identification of a boundary-maintaining entity or process (Laszlo & Krippner, 1998). The entity, Houston Healthcare, located in Warner Robins, Georgia has a mission statement that affirms “to improve the healthcare of the communities we serve by providing patient-focused, high quality, cost-effective services while promoting health and wellness” (Houston Healthcare, 2015). The Houston Healthcare system values respect, integrity, service innovation, and excellence among its staff and patients (Houston Healthcare, 2015). However at some point, even the best system designs will recognize potential problems and require adjustments in order to fine tune or maximize it productivity. The purpose of this paper is to describe the labor and delivery unit at Houston Healthcare using systems theory terminology. This paper will also identify a potential problem within the unit using an open- systems approach, and state where the problem exists using the systems theory model. Lastly, this article will explain a proposed resolution to the problem that would uphold the organization’s mission and values and improve the culture and climate.

This microsystem hospital is part of a macro system, a broader, overarching national health care organization (Hickey & Brosnan, 2012). This hospital is certified for 125 beds; although the daily average census ranges from 50-78 patients. The organizational structure falls in line with the flat design, meaning the hierarchical layers are flattened. The chain of command is flattened and the organization is

Systems thinking is the capacity to see the master plan and to recognize patterns as opposed to conceptualizing change as segregated events. System thinking requires the other four orders to empower a learning organization to be figured it out. Additionally system thinking demonstrates that there is no outside that the reason for your issues at a piece of a solitary system.

In systems therapy it is not just one single therapy, it is an eclectic approach. The system perspective is based on the principle of circular causality. Example: the actions caused by one family member influence the actions of all other family members affecting the functioning of the family system, including the person who was responsible for the initial action.

These best practices have been observed to transform the performance of many organizations. The use of effective communication and critical thinking can make it easier for healthcare workers to implement superior care delivery models based on the unique needs of the targeted patients. Teamwork is a powerful practice that is widely associated with effective leadership (Al-Sawai, 2013). Healthcare departments characterized by teamwork focus on the unique needs of the targeted clients and underserved

A system is a collection of elements that interact with each other over time to function as a whole. Systems thinking is a combination of the previous four practices: personal mastery, mental models, shared vision and team learning to dissect and examine the practices of the organization. I first heard learned about systems thinking five years ago when I started in the Hazelwood School District. Our district had just began our district wide professional development on systems thinking, but then we had a change in our superintendent in late August, just a few weeks after the start of school. With the change in district leadership, came a change in our district focus, and systems thinking was almost immediately abandoned. However, since revisiting it this semester, I can’t help but incorporate it into many of my daily

Systems Thinking – It is the ability to see the 10,000 foot see, and to perceive plans instead of conceptualizing change as isolated events. Systems thinking needs the other four requests to engage a learning relationship to be made sense of it. There must be a standpoint change - from being separated to interconnect to the whole, and from denouncing our issues for something external to an affirmation that how we function, our exercises, can make issues.

Systems ideas is referring to three different types of systems, each created in a different era; general systems theory, ecosystem perspectives and complex systems theory (Healy, 2005). Systems Ideas in social work originated with general systems theory

Systems thinking is a method of thinking that looks at the interconnectedness between different elements rather than a linear cause and effect approach and sees patterns of change rather than fixed “snapshots”. In essence it is a view on the “whole picture” (Anderson, R 1994).

A country’s economy and well-being depends upon how strong its healthcare system is. A country would grow into a stronger nation if the people are mentally and physically stronger. Moreover, healthcare systems are usually complex and complicated systems and thus, they need a lot of attention. As Donley (2005) states, “[t]he changing patterns of health care delivery have increased complexity in all practice environments” (p. 314). By a complicated system, it means how different healthcare organizations together play a pivotal role in measuring success of a country’s healthcare system. These healthcare organizations further rely on various departments within the system which are in turn led by various leaders. Thus, it is evident how leaders are the key link in deciding the fate

When an organization is approached as a whole, appropriate actions can be assigned to tasks thus making the system of the organization run more smoothly. Besides that, according to Senge, systems thinking gives us the realization of the importance of a feedback means in an organization.