Similarities Between Chief Seattle And Chief Tecumseh

I will first be comparing the 2 dreams they each have. Both of the speeches inspired and motivated the audience, therefore compelling them to take action. Also They both dreams of freedom. They both wanted right for both their kinds. Both were willing to speak their minds so that they could have the luxury they were denied. And in their speeches, their very words implied how the strong bond of friendship could contribute to their freedom.

First and foremost, a key similarity between the speeches exists where they both lack violent approaches in determination for their causes. In the speech from Yousafzai, she explains to the audience why the wise saying “the pen was mightier than the sword” (Yousafzai) was true. Her belief in education over violence had come to a climax in knowing what should be promoted. Nonviolence as it is, can be found solving the world's problems as Yousafzai discovered. Just as her situation is written in her speech, King’s also reveals his agreeable view on non-violence by saying “In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds.

In these speeches that both great minds gave there is some things that are alike then there's some differences . Some likes and differences are obvious and others are really hard to figure out. For some who have trouble paying attention, listening to the speeches it’s harder for them and for those who can listen to it over and over again and still understand it , it's easy for them. Then there's those who try to pay attention because they are important to the history of Americans, but just can't pay attention so they are a little of both problems.

An example from the speech is "I hear the mournful wail of millions, whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday are, today, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts to reach them. " and "to their fellow men, to beat them with sticks, to flay their flesh with the lash, to load their limbs with irons, to hunt them with dogs, to sell them at auction, to sunder their families, to knock out their teeth, to burn their flesh...". Going into such gruesome detail to help appeal to people humane side. Not shying away from the atrocities that occur in the everyday life of his fellow Americans. Hoping to make the people take a step back and reflect wondering if this the world they want to live in today. The biggest rhetorical device Douglas uses though is logos. He portrays in two different ways on his speech. First by quoting the founding fathers. How the original leaders of our country preached for the equality of all men and not just white men. Reminding them that every man has his human rights of his own life and freedom. Since many arguments against this were that slaves were property and not "men'. Douglas then brought up

The Sioux and Chippewa Indian tribes’ have a drastically different way of living compared to what other people are accustomed to in terms of their history, clothing, tools, and weapons needed for survival. The Sioux Indians were originally from Asia, but migrated to America about 30,000 years ago. Their long, straight jet-black hair resembles that of the Asian descendants. The Sioux tribes were located in The Great Plains, which consists of 7 different states Minnesota, Wisconsin, North and South Dakota; however, they were also known to live in parts of Nebraska, Illinois, and Montana. “The name Sioux is an abbreviation of Nadouessioux. (Britannica) The name was given to them by the Ojibwa (Chippewa). Sioux means, “Little snake”. The Sioux tended to follow the pattern of the buffalo, which is why they are found in multiple locations.

Jackson found that the native americans were occupying land that he wanted for American citizens, so he harshly forced them out.. In Document A, Jackson proposed that the Native Americans are taking over our land and we need to take it back. If you really think about what he is saying, he wants to take the people out of their homes, drive them away with nothing, and take it for our country. While he is planning this, the Native people already had an agreement with the US which gave them rights to hat land by treaty. Jackson is shown as a villain by shoving these people out of their homelands without caring about how this could affect them, only how it would help him. In Document B, it describes the Trail of Tears, where Jackson made the Native Americans leave their homes sometimes at gunpoint and face horrible conditions, like disease, unjust punishment, lack of resources, starvation, and sometimes even death. They had to travel from the southeast of the Mississippi to Oklahoma in these conditions. Even though this land was rightfully theirs and ancestors were the one who created this home Jackson made them leave anyway. George Washington even though the right way to deal with the Native Americans was to be kind to them and help them become a part of our

Although both speeches are not that important , I do believe Chief Joseph speech was more effective in History. He really put lots of effort in the speech .He wanted justice for his people he wanted the same rights and freedom as any white man .Joseph's speech was a very well written speech.

Tecumseh’s biggest concerns were that his people would not live according to the Prophet which was casting off all elements of the Euro-American society. He believed that his people would turn to alcohol, firearms, and trade goods set out by English ways, which was what the Prophet said, would be detrimental to their ways. No matter what, Tecumseh was going to make sure the Indian way of life would continue forever. He led a revolution of young men who thought the leadership structure needed to be looked over again in order to survive. They fought to make sure The Indians East of the Mississippi to keep control over their home land. Tecumseh tried to visit neighboring tribes to form an alliance to protect the lands held by the Natives. He was successful in the way the Southern tribes would accept the alliance, but unsuccessful with others when some refused to join the reliance, such as the Iroquois tribe.

Both President George W. Bush and Patrick Henry wrote very similar pieces. Henry delivered a speech known as “Speech to Virginia Convention” to Virginia delegates as to why America should separate from Great Britain. President Bush bush presented a speech “President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat”, that was broadcasted internationally regarding the decision to use military force against Iraq. As we now know today, both speeches effectively persuaded others. The two are similar through the use of multiple rhetorical devices such as pathos, loaded language and ethos.

At One time Tecumseh , A Native American disliked the White Settlement . He was also a Shawnee and known as a chief. He was born in 1768 in a place now known as Columbus Ohio. in the eighteen-hundreds he fought the US and he later died in war.

What do Thomas Paine Dred Scott and Shawnee Chief Tecumseh all have in common they all were willing to die for what they believed was right. Thomas Paine could have been killed for his publication of common sense many British loyalists could argue it was treason against the crown. Dred Scott fought against a slave owner for his freedom even though he ultimately lost the case it still helped raise the question of slaves being property or human. The Shawnee chief Tecumseh was a natural born leader who saw the injustice of his people he didn't want his tribe to lose their traditions and religious practices just because they weren't similar to what the Americans practiced. Tecumseh was one of the most influential figures in Native American history.

Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine helped persuade America to declare their independence during the Revolutionary War against Great Britain. Both, Henry and Paine used many rhetorical devices throughout their speeches. The tone is the main difference between Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Thomas Paine’s “The Crisis”.

Kairos is a type of argumentative persuasion in the both speakers tried to get their appeal across to the nation by using the Civil Rights movement that was happening at the time to there advantage. When appealing to the nation the speakers use common ground to get the people in agreeing with their statements before telling them what changes that they want to happen. In Wallace’s inaugural address at the capitol of Alabama he used segregation push his campaign. He addresses the concerns to his followers that they are in trouble if the nation doesn’t start segregation in America our freedom would be taken away from us. Six months after that speech Dr. King gave his “I Have a Dream” after the march on Washington D.C with the hundreds of people present. In the front of Lincoln Memorial as a sign of freedom he appealed to the nation that it needed to come together because that is what makes America great. In an opinion in the similarities these two speeches both speakers are trying to persuade the United States of America in to their belief in what this nation should be run. Another similarity is the chose of locations that they both chose being at historic landmarks. The differences can be found in the way these men used their time, Dr. King gave a short but powerful speech that got strait to the point of the topic he wanted to get across while Wallace gave a long speech that took awhile to get to the point and that lost peoples attention. The manner in witch

The speaker of the second speech is Martin Luther King, and he is probably the most famous person associated with the civil rights movement.

The secondary and tertiary audiences for the two pieces are very similar however. In both he was also trying to win over others who did not agree with him, who were mainly Christian and Caucasian Americans at the time. Throughout his speech he mentioned American society, Justice, and the differences that African Americans were forced to face in