preview

Similarities Between Frankenstein And The Fall Of The House Of Usher

Decent Essays

The novel Frankenstein and The Fall of the House of Usher both have the pattern of the question of what constitutes the human. This question helps in the creation of aspects of horror and the unknown. In Frankenstein the question is created with the creation of the monster. In The Fall of the House of Usher the same question is created when Roderick acts depressed almost like he is being possessed. This question is a frightening proposition because the unknown and un-human is a deeply-rooted human fear. It is this fear that makes these stories frightening.
In Frankenstein the question of what constitutes the human plays the roles of director, extra, and actor in the direction of the storyline, plot movement, and the characters themselves. In this novel Dr. Frankenstein takes it upon himself to create the perfect being instead of the natural way of reproduction the monster and the question of what constitutes the human. Victor is un-human because he believes himself to be a god destroying the natural …show more content…

The narrator describes Roderick, the master of the House of Usher such: “….I could not, even with effort, connect its Arabesque expression with an idea of simple humanity” hinting at the fact that Roderick in un-human. Roderick becomes depressed and starts to act in a possessed manner almost as if he were no longer entirely human but rather half-human and half something paranormal directing the reader to the un-human features that he possesses. At the end of this short story when the Usher estate is swallowed up by the tarn, which was previously described as sinister looking, implying that the tarn is a representation of the un-human aspects of Roderick and his family. Using various aspects of the background and plot Edgar Allen Poe directs the reader through the narration to the hints that Roderick is

Get Access