Similarities Between French Revolution And Egyptian Revolution

Despite the fact that French and Russian revolutions occurred over a century apart, both revolutions had two major similarities: poor economy and bad leadership. Poor economic conditions affected most strongly regular people who simply wanted justice and equality. As a result, both revolutions were sparked by the people’s desire to replace their autocracy governments. Although both revolutions had a lot in common, they had differences as well. The French revolution was deeply rooted in the ideals of Enlightenment and involved the overthrow of the monarchy. Russian revolution, on the other hand, had communist values and occurred due to collapse of government from the top.

Amongst the turbid and dysfunction that is the Middle East lies the nation of Egypt. Egypt, a major country of the Middle East, is habitually considered stereotypical of Middle Eastern civilization, but further research guides one to the conclusion that Egypt is far from a generic Middle Eastern country. Egypt has a strong tradition of nationalism that has been formed during its history, giving it a national unity that is often non-existent in other Middle Eastern nations (1). This, as well as other advantages that Egypt has gained during its past, has allowed it to rise above the problems plaguing the rest of the Middle East and to form basically its

The French and American Revolutions are more similar than different due to their parallelism in their cause of revolution such as high taxation and use of Enlightenment ideas and also the impact of the legacy of the Bill of Rights and the government of Republic of each revolution that governs the people today.

The American and French revolutions continue to be two momentous events that have a multitude of similarities, along with differences. Both the Americans and the French decided to rebel because of the maltreatment which obligated them to follow unfair rules, along with having to pay a vast amount of taxes. Each revolution also came as a result of the people trying to claim their independence, along with their freedom from the government that controlled them. Once the revolutionists won, the Americans, along with the French created their own political documents. While these revolutions contain more similarities, a difference that appears would be that the Americans received outside assistance from French troops, and the French received nothing.

In order for a revolution to be successful, there are many components and stages that play into it. Matter of fact, George Didi-Huberman, the author of the article Uprisings argues that there are five different parts: elements, gestures, words, conflicts, and desires. Each part is unique and significant in its own way. This can be noted from analyzing different revolutions and rebellions throughout time and the outcome of them. Agreeing with Didi-Huberman, I will provide examples of each division and demonstrate how each one is necessary.

Despite the fact that they are more than a few of similarities in these rebellions. Both the American Revolution and French Revolution were the harvests of Enlightenment standards that highlighted the knowledge of ordinary human rights and fairness. By a philosophical base, it develops pure when one arrays out to compare the French Revolution and American Revolution that individuals felt the need to be free since domineering or dictatorial statute of complete royals and consume the aptitude to live self-governing on or after such powers. The control in both republics at the time of their rebellions was surely oppressive, particularly in standings of tax system. Equally parts hurt community and financial adversities that managed to the comprehension

The government had undergone a shift after Mubarak’s removal from power, and the book illuminates the unthinkable changes

According to the text, in Cairo my city they were trying to force the middle east and north Africa to become a Muslim county. “The author states in 2010 the democratic reforms reverberated throughout the middle east and north Africa in a movement known as the Arab spring”. Cairo and two other women were on the boat headed home when Cairo had changed her mind and took the two women and ran to the revolution called the Arab spring. They went there to bring democratic because they didn’t like the way they were living. This caused people to die in the revolution because of democratic. The reason why they went was because the way they

When Mubarak was ousted in 2011, the citizens of Egypt identifying with liberal political views split into several political parties such as the: Wafd, Justice Party, Free Egyptians, Democratic Front Party, Social Democratic Party and the Free Egypt Party. The overarching interest of these liberal groups is to establish a liberal democracy in Egypt. They want to see constitutional order within Egypt in which military and religious institutions do not play a role in politics, but where the people run the government and the political system, best representing their (the majority’s) interests. These liberal groups generally campaign for an elected parliament, state power being divided into three branches, and equal rights for all of Egypt’s citizens paying no mind to race or gender, with the government protecting all of its’ citizens basic rights. (Rutherford)

As 2010 approached its ending, a previously unheard of global issue started surfacing. All over the Middle East and parts of East Africa, a loud mantra could be heard repeatedly in the air. The chant made its way through many countries, gathering more and more followers as it travelled all around the Arab world. Social media sprung with constant chatter with a certain phrase appearing almost everywhere: “The people want to topple the regime.” Thousands of fed up youth and their elders filled the streets, demanding political freedom and economic stability from their unjust rulers. For many people, they didn’t see it coming. Despite the fact that democracy had been spreading across many areas of Europe, East Asia, Africa, and Latin America, many Middle Eastern countries have been standing their grounds, refusing to change. Their leaders had been in power for way too long to even consider a switch in politics that could risk their personal gains. All across the Arab land, frustration and hostility filled the air as people started realizing how long they have been dormant. It wasn’t a surprise when someone finally decided to end the silence. On December 17, 2010, Mohamed Bouazizi, a Tunisian fruit vendor, set himself on fire after having his goods confiscated unjustly by a police officer. Just like a falling row of dominos, Bouazizi’s decision caused a chain reaction causing millions of angry Tunisians to take a stand, finally deciding to face their corrupt

A revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both violent and non-violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab World that began on 18 December 2010, later gained the heading “The Arab spring”. The Arab spring began by a twenty six year old boy named Mohammed Bouazizi was getting ready to sell fruits and vegetables in a rural town of Sidi Bouzid Tunisia. Bouazizi was the primary supporter for his widowed mother and six of his siblings. The entire incident originated when the police officer asked bouazizi to hand over his wooden cart, he refused the police women allegedly slapped him after being publicly humiliated bouazizi marched in front of a government building and set himself on fire. The Jasmine revolution in Tunisia, the shock wave swept across the country which threatened the stability of this oil-rich region with repercussion felt internationally. After the world witnessed what happened in Tunisia, it caused a spilled over into most of the Arab countries. Such as Egypt, Libya Syria and Yemen. Aim of this paper is to show that the current situation corollary of decades of failed policies, exacerbated by an unsolicited foreign intervention. The extensive consequences, I will argue, require cautious attention and careful management from international communities as well as the Arab human rights committee. This paper seeks to explore the profound causes that prompted the so called “Arab awakening” and the covert hidden agenda behind the sudden pro democratic

This documentary follows the events that have occurred in Egypt’s government and civilian lives since the beginning of year 2011 and the documentary ends in the summer of 2013. Protests erupt and occur for almost three weeks. The President at the time, President Mubarak, stepped down, handed over power to military, suspended the constitution, and disbanded the parliament. “The army and the people, hand in hand” became a hopeful chant that the military had no interest in, showing the people this when they crushed another protest. Not too long after this, civilians were taken to the Egyptian Museum. There they were tortured, some taken too military courts and prisons. A few months later, a Christian protest was broken up by armored vehicles

In the megacity of Cairo the economic, political, and social difference between the rich and the poor is outsized. The crux of Wikan’s article is the Egyptian revolution that is celebrated around the world paved the way for future success in Cairo. Cairo’s poor is an example of hope and optimism, especially for other Third World countries (Wikan 2012:168). The Egyptian revolution was a political conflict and remained a peaceful protest, which followed in the removal of Egyptian President, Hosni Mubarak (Wikan 2012:141). In Cairo not all lower class citizens celebrated. Society feared that the way the President was forced to leave did not demonstrate their fundamental values, therefore the community was split with emotions (Wikan 2012:143).

During the time of that speech, Egypt had already lived through sixteen days of unrest and instability security-wise. That was due to the dull days the people lived through for the past thirty years of presidency for Mubarak. These days were full of corruption and fraud in each and every sector in the country starting with Mubarak and down the hierarchy. People were fed up, as the rich became richer and the poor became poorer with no respect to human rights. Education was appalling, so was the healthcare and unemployment rate was too high, and the country was experiencing a huge downfall. Egyptians wanted to call it to an end, so they took the streets and requested the resignation of Mubarak, when he refused using the speech which

“Egypt’s revolution has scared away millions of foreign tourists, the lifeblood of the nation’s economy, and now this ancient kingdom of tombs resembles a