Similarities Between George Orwell And 1984

The idea about human to reconcile the uncertainties of the past with a new or present situation. Throughout the year I studied the texts about, novel 1984 by George Orwell, a film Good Will Hunting and Shakespeare's play Hamlet. In these texts because the characters' uncertainty about the past, they won’t succeed in future situations in their lives. I'm referring from the text of how these uncertainties can have an effect for these protagonists throughout the story until they reach tougher situations.

In a world where you get prosecuted for thinking something the government does not approve of, life can be scary. In the novel 1984, the citizens of Oceania live their lives oblivious to the world around them. From being under continuous surveillance by telescreens to the prohibition of speaking to the opposite gender, this novel serves as a warning to the people of the modern era. It gives an idea of what would happen to our future if people didn’t break free of societal norms. Orwell gives us a warning against a bleak, unfree future, a brainwashing government, and constant war.

George Orwell’s 1984 is more than just a novel, it is a warning to a potential dystopian society of the future. Written in 1949, Orwell envisioned a totalitarian government under the figurehead Big Brother. In this totalitarian society, every thought and action is carefully examined for any sign of rebellion against the ruling party. Emotion has been abolished and love is nonexistent; an entire new language is being drafted to reduce human thought to the bare minimum. In a society such as the one portrayed in 1984, one is hardly human. In George Orwell’s 1984, the party uses fear, oppression, and propaganda to strip the people of their humanity.

When George Orwell wrote his novel, 1984, Hitler and Mussolini had recently been defeated in World War II, the nuclear arms race was warming up and the Soviet Union was a threat to the world. Although these are not problems in today's society, 1984 is still very relevant in current time, "The twentieth century will soon be over, but political terror still survives and this is why Nineteen Eighty-four remains valid today” (Ricks 5). In the novel 1984 the main character Winston is faced with challenges when he meets a woman named Julia. Julia makes him question his loyalty to the government. They are living under a totalitarian government that sees everything you do, hears everything you say, and knows everything you think. George Orwell’s novel 1984 is still relevant in today’s society.

Mankind today has many sources predict that the future is likely headed into a world of tyranny, controlled by technology and secretive authorities playing us like marionettes. In the novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, it explains the stories of two middle aged men, Guy Montag and Winston Smith, who live in dystopian societies where stupidity is conventional and knowledge is a crime. Bradbury teaches his audience that books are extremely vital for knowledge, while Orwell shows how technology and the manipulation of perception can easily be used to brainwash others into believing almost anything. While the high forces attempt to hypnotize everyone, the heroes of the story share similar fates, escape it and realize that the controlling forces in their society are performing an eradication of intelligence and freedom in order to manipulate mankind and they make a stand to fight for the truth.

Orwell used many common themes throughout all of his work. These themes included dangers of totalitarian government, psychological manipulation, control of information, and politics of the day. To show the significance of these themes Orwell uses rhetorical strategies such as parallel structure, rhetorical questions, metaphors, and similes. Using these rhetorical strategies Orwell is able to prove the importance of his common themes throughout all of his works.

Many times in life, things change in ways no one would have expected them to. In the novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, significant symbols develop different meanings along the course of the books. Both novels are relatively similar and consist of the same theme; the destruction of society due to the immense power that the government has. Even though the authors styles differ, each novel contains different symbols that evolve over time, as well as the same recurring theme of the dangers that come with immense government power.

The Party has complete control over documents and history, this allows them to change the past, present or future to make previously said facts more believable or truthful. One of Winston’s jobs in 1984 is to change documents from the past to make facts from the present true or predictions of the future more truthful. For example, during hate week, an announcement was made that the previously given information, that Oceania was at war with Eurasia, was false. Oceania was actually at war with Eastasia and Eurasia was actually an ally. Winston, along with everyone in his workplace, had to make sure that the records were all correct. They all worked non-stop until all of the ‘evidence’ of false history had been thrown out or changed. “... Oceania

In the two classic dystopian novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the authors write about tyrannical governments which terrorize their citizens. As well as that, both authors comment on the psychological and sociological ramifications that censorship has on members of society. Orwell’s outspokenness against totalitarians and social injustices combined with Bradbury’s knowledge of censoring governments due to the McCarthy scandal and Stalin’s reign of terror led to their reflection on what the world may succumb to if these events continued to occur. The protagonists, Winston Smith in 1984 and Guy Montag in Fahrenheit 451, attempt to liberate themselves and the societies in which they live from their oppressive and

Based on the novel, “1984” written by George Orwell, in some ways our society is similar to “1984’s” society. The novel was about a society in which the government had complete control of its citizen’s lives. Society became a puppet of the government and was incapable of unorthodox thinking. Anything against their rules would result in severe punishment. If an individual was overly disobedient, the punishment could result in exile.

Imagine a world in which you are constantly being watched. False history, monitored sex, no freedom. Obfuscating fact with falsehood becomes the standard, it is expected. Your entire life is decided for you, and you do not even know it. You are even content with it.

Readers of George Orwell have long appreciated the significance of his representation of a futuristic dystopian world. ‘Big brother is watching you,’ ‘Thought police,’ ‘Ministry of love,’ ‘Hate week,’ are expressions that Orwell used to represent his preoccupation with the totalitarian regimes of 20th century. More than one out of four Americans said they have red his dystopia and use his expressions in their language. Many critics claim that the novel opened up new prospects of political awareness. ‘1984’ is a political fiction in which the government eliminates all forms of political opposition, be it real or imaginary. The atmosphere of the novel is completely depressing because there is no hope for change. The government dominates people morally and forces them to live in constant fear. His terrifying vision of a future in which all aspects of society are controlled by a tyrannical system attracted the

Developing emotions such as compassion are arguably the most fundamental part of being human. However, when a danger such as an over controlling government threatens to take those feelings away, one truly appreciates the kindness and loyalty of humans. In 1984, George Orwell is able to use O’Brien’s deceptive, astute, and political nature in order to warn readers about the negative effects that a brainwashing totalitarian government could have on human minds and emotions.

In society, whether ancient or modern-day, governments always ask themselves the question on how they should convince their citizens to follow their orders. Nowadays, pleasing the populace and being respectful to their wishes is a common practice among many Western governments. However in the past, there have been many experiments to find the most practical way to rule. Anarchy, authoritarianism, censorship and transparency are ideas that were thrown around during those experimental times. No way is correct, though there are methods are yield better results than some. In the end, it all comes down the execution of these ideas to gauge their effectiveness. Of course, practicing inhumane forms of government is considered wrong by today’s standard; so, many authors decide to write about different forms of governments, imagining how a certain practice will play out in society without harming actual humans. In the novels 1984 and Fahrenheit 451, the various ideas of governments controlling their citizens are heavily explored with 1984 suggesting control via censorship of materials and knowledge alongside absolute authority over their behaviours will lead to great success while Fahrenheit 451 demonstrating control through by blocking information and creating widespread ignorance among their citizens will lead to disastrous results.

Living in a world that continues to make advancements technologically and politically, a book written more than 50 years ago still warns the world of what could happen if government becomes too forceful. Because of George Orwell's strong hatred for totalitarianism and its life dictating qualities, readers can get a taste of the perfect "dystopia". Though the people of today have been warned and are afraid of an all controlling government, they continue to allow the concept of 1984 to become more and more real. If people continue to just watch their governments make decisions and not ask questions, they will fall victim to its power. If a man not of this time understands the terror of totalitarianism, everyone should