Similarities Between Jonathan Edwards And Patrick Henry

“A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.” John C. Maxwell

Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan minister, preached a sermon in 1741 titled “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” His sermon is about the punishments the evil people will receive after death. Edwards uses the emotion of fear through the power of his words along with many syntactic techniques to influence his listeners to turn to God and save their long term souls.

Many people would agree that Puritan Jonathan Edwards and Rationalist Patrick Henry were both rhetorically effective because of their powerful use of pathos throughout their writings. But ultimately, Rationalist Patrick Henry was able to be more rhetorically convincing because of his strong and compelling use of ethos and logos.

Jonathan Edwards was one of the most famed evangelical preachers in the Age of the Great Awakening. He is best known for his most impactful sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” Edwards preached with fury and conviction of the All Great our God. He preached for the wanderers; those lost in their spiritual belief. Edwards uses a wide variety of figurative language and rhetorical techniques to urge unregenerate Christians to sanctify their lives and walk devoutly before God, using fear. During this time of recognition, renewal and self-reliance in one’s connection with God, Edwards’ sermon did nothing but illustrate the exact conception of the age of the Great Awakening.

Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” was a persuasive speech during the Great Awakening. His sermons persuaded people to convert to the church immediately to avoid damnation of a wrathful God. Fearful of Hell, Edwards managed to save the Puritan church and those who strayed

spoke on different subjects and affected people in many different ways but had a great influence

In Homer's the Odyssey, Odysseus shows that he has the characteristics of an effective leader by being brave against the gods and the cyclops and by doing this he inspires his crew, and pushing through the hardships, like the cyclops and the gods declining him access to make it home along with Penelope testing his mind after the massacre of the suitors. Also, he is very manipulative and able to trick his enemies to find his way home. So in my opinion this sets a great example for being an effective leader like Odysseus.

To conclude, Edwards’ authoritative position, beautiful use of language, and contrast between the pre- and post- salvation all contribute to the persuasive ability of the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” The hellfire and brimstone style of preaching is so memorable that it is still noteworthy almost 250 years

Edwards’ work was so effective because of its use of conscious and subconscious, verbal, emotional, and sensuous appeal (Cady). The emotional power throughout the sermon is created by the sheer amount of rich and versatile imagery (Cady). This original imagery was a work of art that created a truly poetic and artistic feeling (Cady). There are countless examples of imagery in Edwards’ sermon with the goal of persuading the audience to convert. To sum up, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” God has full control over and you are merely a little bug to him that can be dropped or squashed at any second (Cady). The goal of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” was to stir with the readers emotions and to stimulate their soul, but to also reveal the purity within them (Cady). This sermon left a permanent mark on people, which either had people questioning their own faith, or giving them the will to convert immediately. Each and every word written in his sermon can be traced back to his personality, which had a major impact on his writing. Edwards’ polemicist personality made it easy for him to criticize the reader with crushing logic (Cady). He would face his fears and would not run away from his problems, and took what was thrown at him (Cady). This shows that Edwards truly believed in the message behind his sermon, and he

Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry are both very determined writers with a purpose of persuasion. In the sermon “Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God” Edwards is trying to persuade his audience to convert and be born again with God. Where in Henry’s speech “Speech at the Virginia Convention” he is trying to persuade and convince the patriots to go to war with Britain. In both of these pieces, the writers are standing up for something they believe is right. Although each one of them is different, they also have similarities in their ways of writing. Edwards’ and Henry’s writings are both similar and different in style, tone, and purpose.

Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry persuaded people to do something in very different ways. While Jonathan Edwards used fear to persuade people, Patrick Henry used emotion. Edwards used fear to try and sway people from sinning. Henry used emotional appeal to get people to stand up to Britain. Both were very effective at what they were trying to accomplish.

Leadership is a trait that few people possess, but many are influenced by its powerful qualities. Leadership has been described by most accounts as the ability to unite a group under one common goal or task. This crucial quality is necessary in order to be remembered by many people. It is necessary when people around you need guidance, or a sense of direction. When people need guidance, they look to figures of power or authority, to ultimately lead them in the right direction. Many years later, that person, who had leaded others, will be revered. This reverence, or legacy that they leave behind, will make them a hero. People who possessed great leadership throughout history left a huge legacy behind with them. Ben Franklin, a radical during the 18th century for revolution, was a wealthy man of Pennsylvania who possessed great leadership throughout the course of his life. The stand out quality he possessed, his great knowledge, enabled him to lead great numbers of people in their interests. This quality made him looked up upon as a revolutionary by all of the United States, and people were willing to unite behind Franklin due to his self-made image. Years after Franklin had passed, people still remembered and celebrated his legacy every day in the names of warships, towns, and buildings. Benjamin Franklin was a leading revolutionary all of his life due to his educated background and

What defines an effective leader is not only the attributes and competencies he or she display’s but also the legacy they leave behind. To lead effectively is to make a difference and can range from the personal level up to differences on a global scale. The United States Army defines leadership as “The process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization” (Department of the Army, 2012, p. Glossary-1). Although not a military man, Samuel Adams embodied the US Army definition of a leader. Often referred to as the Father of the American Revolution, Samuel Adams possessed the character, presence, and intellect to lead others, develop the idea of independence, and

America’s sixth president, John Quincy Adams, defined leadership this way: “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” I agree that effective leadership is distinguished by four critical qualities: passion, vision, emotional intelligence, and confidence. Leaders who possess these qualities are able to make a positive impact on their institution—as Adams did, improving American life through his strong hand on the wheel of the ship.

“A true leader has the confidence to stand alone, the courage to make tough decisions, and the compassion to listen to the needs of others. He does not set out to be a leader, but becomes one by the equality of his actions and the integrity of his intent.” — Douglas MacArthur