Similarities Between Julius Caesar And The Handmaid's Tale

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are several occassions in which the speaker must convince an audience to do something or react in a certain way. Persuasion and rhetoric are powerful tools that Brutus utilizes to manipulate the Roman citizens and his fellow conspirators.

Words can sway opinions like the tides of an ocean. Rhetoric is an extremely important tool in modern politics and it has been for hundreds of years. Although modern society may think of rhetoric as a way to spread propaganda, in reality rhetoric is just a tool for effective communication. In Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar, the entire play revolves around the effective use of persuasion. Mark Antony is a rhetorical mastermind who exploits his audience using logos and pathos, making him the most persuasive character in the play Julius Caesar.

Rhetoric is a form of persuasion often used in, “Julius Caesar,” the reader may find it in Antony and Brutus farewell speeches to Caesar. In the story, “Julius Caesar” Antony has many objective points against Brutus and as to why the common folk should distrust him. Brutus however has many strong claims as to why he decided to slay his beloved friend, he offered, “I love Caesar, but I loved Rome more,” as an excuse to distract the common folk from harming him and the other counterparts. Julius Caesar is about betrayal, and how one can never be too trusting.

Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is the story of the resulting conflicts from the assassination of perpetual dictator and Roman emperor, Julius Caesar. A great friend of Caesar, Mark Antony, comes to the senate to see the dead body of their dictator. He pretends to not be angry at those who took part in the assassination, and asks to speak at his funeral, a request which he is granted. However, after the men leave, he begins a soliloquy in which he suggests that Caesar's spirit will take revenge upon his murderers and invoke a war involving the entire country. Antony begins the revenge of his death by speaking at the funeral about the wrong done to Caesar, the man's generosity to the people, and how Brutus tried to persuade them to

Novel and Film Analytical Paper: The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood Thelma & Louise by Ridley Scott Sexism and gender roles have divided societies for centuries while the great feminist movement has impacted everybody. How women from the past and from the present struggle to managed their position in society as gender roles define their lives. Analyzing the novel The Handmaid’s Tales and the movie Thelma & Louise, I will evaluate, compare and contrast the advantages and drawbacks of the feminist movement. With completely different settings and scenarios, these two stories will have a struggle that will defined their ends. Analyzing these diverse turnouts; from a handmaid that wishes to get pregnant so her life has a meaning as a women,

Margaret Atwood’s text, The Handmaid’s Tale, centers around the potential outcome of a world ruled under an austere theocratic government, whose power is sustained through harsh violence, incessant observation of the people, and the re-educating of the people being governed. With the creation of this fictional, dystopian society, Atwood addresses prospective issues that would be related to a society such as the Republic of Gilead. One of the more significant issues that arises early in the novel and continues for the duration is the concern of females and their roles in society, from a highly sexual standpoint. Atwood touches upon a plethora of issues throughout the novel, as told through the viewpoint of Offred. Using a feministic approach to analyze the text, combined with research in regards to the major feminist movements taking place between the 1960s and 1980s in America—the time at which this book was written and published—Atwood magnifies and popularizes feminist rights in politics.

As society began to change in 1986 the novel “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood was published. Narrated by Offred an oppressed handmaid “The Handmaid’s Tale” presents the life of a neglected women in the unordinary Gilead society. A handmaid is a women that is owned by a commander. All women have assigned roles in the Gilead society. The handmaid’s duty is to have sex with the commander in order to produce a baby because the commander’s wife is not fertile. Handmaids have to wear red. In Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale”, Offred uses degrading and descriptive language to establish her identity, create meaning for herself and to defy Gilead's authority.

“The good want power, but to weep barren tears. Powerful goodness wants worse need for them. Wise want love; those who love to want wisdom; And all best things are thus confused to ill.” Shelly claims about the desire for power over one's self or others is always a dominant factor in the structure of any society. She illustrates the complexities of power and note the resulting confusion of good and ill when one facet of that complexity takes precedence. She also represent the connection between individual and social control themes which captivates the playwrights and novelists since earliest times. The twentieth-century writer is no passing over. Glen Deer suggests that the innovative technique of the experimental novelist enhances the reader's ability to gain insight "into the social bonds between people of unequal power.” (Deer 2). Among the works, Deer chooses to support his thesis by claiming that the writer's technique is an mechanism in explaining this relationship is Margaret Atwood's novel The Handmaid's Tale. In this study, Atwood suggests to show that her ingenious use of satire writing does indeed build up the reader's ability to gain the understanding into the relationship between the individual and social authority; that

The intentional design of “particicution”, or the execution of one carried about by many, epitomizes the treachery of Gileadean totalitarianism. Those men who are “given” to the Handmaids to be killed are not found guilty of the sexual crime they are said to commit. No, instead, they are guilty of treason, of helping the Handmaids, those who will now execute him. Death by the hands of the benefactors discourages others from committing treachery, but it also provides an outlet for the Handmaids, the most repressed group of society, to express their resentment and rage they harbor toward the men who oppress them. By allowing them to participate in the Guardian’s execution, Gilead channels the Handmaids’ anger onto a single man, who serves as a scapegoat for everyone else. Without this outlet, rebellions are a constant danger. The man is presented as a rapist of Handmaids who caused a miscarriage, meaning that not only does he suggest the sanctioned rape of the Handmaids by the Commanders, but he has robbed the women of the one thing that gives them value,

William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was a historical book. It magnified the way that power was used and the way power was taken advantage of in that time period, Power, greed ,envy, ambition and deception caused Rome to lose their future king . William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar illustrates the negative influences of power,greed,envy,and deception because of Caesar’s ambition.

The play Julius Caesar is deeply rooted in Shakespeare’s characteristic methods of rhetoric and persuasion. This play is primarily driven by the technique of persuasion when Cassius has convinced Brutus that must die. This sets the story in motion; however, the plot ending is determined by Antony’s speech to the people. Shakespeare’s method of rhetoric has been the most powerful usage of words and writing, creating the opportunity to collapse kingdoms and rise anew. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar scrutinizes the power of rhetoric by rivaling two speeches, Brutus verses Mark Antony. In the end, it is shown that Antony’s rhetoric to be clearly greater as his effect on the people’s receival is supportive.

The use of compelling language is an essential part of any speaker’s success, as shown in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Antony’s funeral oration creates tension between the plebeians and the conspirators, leading to war and chaos. In Brutus’ speech, he references the consequences of Caesar’s reign had he lived, convincing the plebeians of his “noble” actions. While Brutus uses logic and rationale to state his case, Antony uses a sentimental and moralistic approach. Marc Antony, though thought of as a sycophant, is angry at Brutus and the conspirators for killing Caesar. Through the use of ethos and pathos, Marc Antony is successful in convincing the crowd of plebeians that Brutus’ claims to end Caesar’s life are unjustified.

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is depicted as a better leader than Brutus, due to his cunning use of rhetoric when addressing the plebeians after Caesar’s death. This essay will be divided into two sections to explore the ways in which Antony is depicted as better leader. The First section will contextualise the extracts used for analysis, and compare Brutus’s pedestrian speech with Mark Antony’s impressive oratory. This will be done by defining what rhetoric is, and how it is used by Antony to win over the plebeians in comparison with Brutus. The second section will use examples taken from Machiavelli’s The Prince, in order to establish that Mark Antony is depicted as a better leader.

William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar focuses on the citizens of Rome during the height of Julius Caesar’s reign, and the choices these people make based on their opinions of such a controversial rule. These choices occur as results of the relationship between political desire and character, as political stances impacting personal life and emotional inflamation fueling a political choice make up the majority of protagonists’ decisions in the narrative. By introducing us to a city of back-stabbing and murder, Shakespeare uses the motivations and reactions of Rome’s people to these actions to show how political decisions and the nature of a person’s character will always affect each other.

From Shakespeare’s adaptation of Julius Caesar and all the other “characters”, the historical differences and similarities can then be noted. Shakespeare makes the flow through the story just like in history; the impactful significance of authority affected the tension and flow of the play’s natural appeal (Caesar re-configured, Roberts). Shakespeare makes it so that the audience can “invoke questions of power and agency” according to how the characters are presented and shown in their own distinct manner (Caesar re-configured, Roberts). In order to make a proper image of the power thirsty characters of Caesar and Cassius for example, the playmakers must understand the dominant and outgoing personalities of the characters which strive for the domineering role of supremacy. Hence, as a result the central motif of power drastically affects how the characters are portrayed and how they should