The Radical and the Republican Abraham Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas were two extremely important men. Lincoln grew up in an anti-slavery home. His parents were anti-slavery and the church they went to was against slavery. Growing up he thought that blacks should have the same rights as the white men. [1] “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” Lincoln was a nice quite guy until the Kansas-Nebraska Act passed in 1854. This made him unhappy. So he then began to speak in political debates. Fredrick was a reformer for most of his life. Fredrick didn’t notice Lincoln until his debates with Stephen Douglas. Lincoln would make strong and engaging speeches. Lincoln was committed to anti-slavery politics. Some mistaken him for an abolishes but, he was just …show more content…
Douglas could not support any ideas that Lincoln had said. Lincoln would present speeches that made him sound like a racist. Soon he plans to join the Republican party. He is very cautious when he joins. Fredrick and Lincoln had many views on anti-slavery but, many different too. The difference is that Lincoln choose his words wisely when speaking. Douglas had a thought of getting rid of slavery completely. When Lincoln heard this he thought there was no way. Lincoln was also a lawyer at this time. His understanding was that the Constitution protected slavery. So he thought there was no chance in this happening. Lincoln and Douglas had the same thought but their pieces just didn’t fit together. Lincoln felt forced to sign for Laws he didn’t believe in. He did not agree with the Fugitive Slave Act. Which was if slaves ran away and you found them then you had to return them. Also if you housed a runaway slave then you were punished. A lot of whites wouldn’t hire the blacks to work for them because they feared that they were a
Maxwell Gifford Ms.Sommer November 23, 2017 Analysis of Douglas and Lincoln President Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas both were influential leaders during late 1800s who wrote insightful books and speeches revealing American history and offering visions for the future. Although there are pronounced differences between the persuasive strategies used by Douglas and Lincoln there are many shared elements such as distinct diction and specific biblical references that makes the text appeal to the reader. In the narrative of Frederick Douglas the author is a abolitionist during the 1800s. The author uses a very somber tone and utilizes basic diction to direct the readers focus to the horrible effects of slavery.
Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass were brave, heroic men who spoke out for freedom and liberty. They were impactful to society not only in their generation but every generation after them. For instance, Lincoln was the key to the door when it came to preserving the union during the Civil War. He really gave the people a reason not to give up, and that the future will be better. “He is dead but the cause he so ardently loved… represented and defended- not for himself only, not for us only, but for all people in their coming generation till shall be no more- that cause survives his fall, and will survive it” (SB, pg 68). In addition, Douglass, an African American abolitionist, wanted to abolish slavery. Douglass wanted to influence the
1. Lincoln and Douglas have different views on the rights black Americans are entitled to enjoy. Lincoln is essentially against slavery since he belongs to the new antislavery Republican Party. He decisively believes that slavery is iniquitous and wrong. He wants to limit the spread of slavery. He trusts that slavery must be ended. Lincoln also intends to abolish slavery when he wins the presidential election. Lincoln considers blacks are entitled to the same right as whites. Therefore, he believes that blacks should be liberated and enjoy what they earn from hard work (278). However, Douglas thinks that ending slavery will cause war. He disagrees to emancipate slaves and prevents them become citizens and voters or to be in the government (275).
In 1860 Abraham Lincoln was elected President. He won the presidential votes of the Republican Party. Lincoln ran against Stephen Douglas. In one of their campaigns in Hartford, Connecticut, Lincoln spoke on the Democratic bushwhacking (Doc F). Part of their campaign were to talk about the slavery. Though Lincoln, a republican, and Douglas, a democratic, their views on slavery were entirely different. Lincoln argued against the spread of slavery while Douglas argued that each territory should have the right
The first reason Lincoln?s ideals were superior to Douglass? is that he realized war over slavery was imminent. During Lincoln?s presidential campaign he delivered the now famous words, ?a house divided against itself cannot stand.? showing that he truly sought unity between the North and the
Douglas and John C. Calhoun. To being, Douglas was the brain child behind the development within the Compromise of 1850 of using popular sovereignty within the states to determine their stances of being free or slave states. As he belief was that slavery should only be decided by those individual within a state in a united front to choose what they want. Douglas attempted to pacify the South by allowing the Fugitive Slave Law, yet no matter what even with the agreement enacted it only helped to push the discomfort felt by both sides helping the push towards the Civil War. Whereas, the Southerner John C. Calhoun was very opposed of the very compromise as his viewpoint was that the institution of slavery was protected by the constitution itself, as within the document, the states retained their rights over any domestic institution like slavery.
Douglas was the most notable black abolitionist. He was a black slave that escaped to the North. He was an abolitionist, but his views on the Kansas-Nebraska Act and slavery say otherwise. He was just trying to get support for his presidential run.
Slavery has been a topic of interest in the United States for hundreds of years. Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass along with many other people were advocates against slavery and racism. By participating in many different antislavery activities, the two men were able to educate the public about the injustices of the system. Lincoln, understood the difficulties that came with abolishing slavery, and the many complications that would arise. Although Lincoln and Douglass were politically different, they had very similar and different views around slavery.
The first reason that Frederick Douglas had a bigger impact on African-American rights is because he was the first to speak against slavery. Douglas went to speak at an anti-slavery meeting. At the anti-slavery meeting, a man said, “Have we been listening to a thing, a piece of property, or to a man?” The replies of the people in the audience were, “A man! A man!” This meant that people believed that the Douglas, a black man, was thought to be a man instead of a thing or piece of property like he was before. People were now beginning to think that slavery might be wrong or that black people have the same rights as white people.
Stephen was the one who repealed the Missouri Compromise’s ban on slavery in the territories of Nebraska and Kansas. Then doctrine was replaced with a thing called popular sovereignty and that meant that people could decide for themselves is they would allow slavery. Abraham would say that popular sovereignty would be nationalized and carry on with slavery. Stephen would argue about the Whigs and the Democrats because they both believed in the popular sovereignty. Abraham said the national policy was to be able to limit the spread of slavery and he mentioned the Northwest Ordinance in 1787, and the Northwest Ordinance banned slavery from a large part of modern-day Midwest. Since Stephen A. Douglas supported the Dred Scott decision, which meant that he compared slaves to property. Douglas argued about Lincoln being an abolitionist and he hoped to end slavery altogether. Douglas used fear, so he can fight against Lincoln calling that if he won that the freed black would end up moving to Illinois and taking jobs from white people. Abraham Lincoln argued that when he wanted to end the extension of slavery into the US territories Lincoln wasn’t fighting for political or social equality for black people. Abraham Lincoln was able to then place Stephen A. Douglas in a no-win political position, and he did this by forcing him to explain his support for popular sovereignty. Stephen A. Douglas did this, which is what is known as the Freeport
Abraham Lincoln, is a Kentucky made legitimate counsel and past Whig agent to Congress, he at first amplified national stature in the midst of his campaign against Stephen Douglas of Illinois for a U.S. Senate seat in 1858. The senatorial fight highlighted a shocking methodology of open encounters on the misuse issue, known as the Lincoln-Douglas reviews, in which Lincoln fought against the spread of subjection, while Douglas kept up that each area should have the point of preference to pick whether for no good reason to be free or
Douglass and President Lincoln agreed that slavery needed to be abolished and the Nation needed to be united as one. Lincoln realized that he needed to bring in Frederick Douglass; the combination of a strong and influential black leader and the President of the United States could now create a cohesive group of abolitionists and the Union. Frederick Douglass realized that President Lincoln’s own personality and political judgment would help him free slaves across the country. Realizing each other’s strengths, both men were able to be effective through the use strong actions and powerful words of one another; their relationship played a key role in changing the nations views on slavery and race.
Douglass worked by being a famous orator preached against slavery and eventually joined the Republican Party where he worked with Lincoln and the party to promote and work toward the end of slavery. By 1858 Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass were saying the same thing, preaching the same antislavery politics. Liberty or Slavery must become law of the land” (Oakes 5) Beyond Garrisonian newspapers, he began to embrace abolitionist politics and the idea that the Constitution supported slave emancipation. “Lincoln saw the Constitution as neither a clarion
A major difference between Lincoln and Douglass were their views on the Constitution. Douglass changed his views about the Constitution; at one point he believed it was a proslavery document and then he changed his opinion to believe it was an anti-slavery document. Lincoln never changed his opinions about the Constitution. “Lincoln saw the Constitution as neither a clarion call to abolition on a proslavery scandal. It was a compromise. It recognized slavery, but only out of necessity and only three times”. (Ibid., p.63) Lincoln believed in the founding fathers and believed that they had envisioned and end to slavery in the future of the then-fledgling United States. He also believed they had to make concessions to allow for the formation of the Union. “Unlike Frederick Douglass, Lincoln did not claim those concessions had not been made. He accepted them, but that didn’t mean he liked them.” (Ibid., p 63)
Abraham Lincoln is by far our most revered president in the history of the United States. He had a strong moral vision of where his country must go to preserve and enlarge the rights of all her people, but he was also a good man with a strong sense of character and a great discipline in the art of law; and he sought to continue the great and mighty legacy of the Constitution. He believed that the Founding Fathers had drawn up the Constitution without the mention of slavery because they felt that it would later die of a natural death. He would soon learn that that would not be the case.