Similarities Between Memi And Sabu

Today we will be comparing and contrasting two works of art. The first work is a statue called “The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu" (The Met, n.d.). The second statue is called the “Statue of Gudea” (The Met, n.d.). Both statues share a number of similarities and differences between each other. We will discuss the comparisons and then the contrasts while identifying the the purpose behind each one.

This pair figures represent Yuny and his wife, Renenutet seated with rigidly formal posture next to him. This statue depicts a powerful couple that looks straight ahead, with their heads held up and blank eyes widely open. The form of their features and

They all had a very important meaning behind them, and looking at them realizing that these were made several thousand years ago shows how ancient and valuable it was. Nikare with his Wife and Daughter was used as a statue to reproduce the real world and convey an individual, and hats what this stone statuary depicted. It shows the audience how much of an influence Nikare was and his role and his family’s roles all in one sculpture. It has a hidden message behind it, the reason why he is much bigger than them and the reason why the wife is kneeling beside him, symbolizing modesty and respect. That is what the artist was trying to communicate in the form of a sculpture. In Stelophorous Statue of Bay, the statue shows you how important religion and afterlife was to those in ancient Egypt. They practiced many rituals and their beliefs were very important to

First of all, the sculpture will fill our lives with the beauty of art as citizens. For example, “the History of Public Art” article gives a background on ancient greek statues and temples, and it states that the “structures helped unite the citizens of the communities of which they stood by providing a concrete focus for national identity and pride” (The History of Public Art). For

In this essay I plan to compare and contrast two different sculptures “The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu” and the “Statue of Gudea”. I will attempt to explain the original purpose for these statues as well as the differences in their appearance.

Memi and Sabu, despite the suggestion in the hieroglyphs upon the piece, are not actually

This research paper is based on a combination of architecture and sculpture, precisely the gargoyle. The inspiration for topic was grasped from a past production paper question which requested that one create a gargoyle spout inspired by a Caribbean cultural aspect. This question deeply intrigued me, providing themes for both a sculpture piece and my research paper.

Sculptures came in a variety of shapes and sizes. They were often made of wood, metal, cloth, or clay. These sculptures served as personal protection figures, symbols for supernatural powers, and representation of ancestors. Most sculptures were made to represent the human body, but some cultures never carve human faces so it resembled any individual in fear of accusations of witch craft. A great example of one such sculpture is Cango and Zaire.

In this sculpture they also express the affection they have for one and other. Next I will examine one other art work, Menkaure, and Queen, to my original double portrait Memi and Sabu, to find some similarities and differences. The preservation of “Royal Acquaintance Memi and Sabu” where found in a tomb in Giza. Which is normal for Egyptian culture because Egyptians were obsessed with death. The preservation of Memi and Sabu sculpture have some chipped pieces but, other than that they are well preserved.

Their faces also bear expressions of contentment or peace. These are things that this sculpture was intended to ensure in the afterlife. Statuary such as this was common for royalty but as shown by Memi and Sabu it was also present for nonroyals as well (The inscription identifies them as “The Royal

The former statue is made of limestone, which says something about the purpose of its creation. It was a stature created for a non-noble Egyptian couple. This is apparent in its unsophistication and the materials used. Limestone is a softer stone material and the statue itself is less sophisticated. The writing is brief and only tells of who the couple were in the sculpture. The details

The two sculptures presented for this assignment are the Statue of Gudea, which dates back to 2090 B.C. (“Statue of Gudea,” 2000) and The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu, which dates back to 2575–2465 B.C. (“The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu,” 2000). Both statues represent people; however, they depict different types of people from completely different time periods and cultural backgrounds. The Statue of Gudea shows the ruler of southern Mesopotamian, Gudea, whose reign was from 2144-2124 B.C. (“The votive statue of Gudea: A formal analysis,” 2011) sitting in a praying position with his hands locked and his eyes forward. He is dressed in what appears to be a lavish robe with an inscription that clearly depicts what Gudea thought of himself and his successes during his time as ruler. The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu represent what is thought to be a married ancient Egyptian couple who are lovingly embracing each other. Aside from looking at

In order to understand the intended purpose of this status we should take in account Egyptians beliefs about life after death. Egyptians from this period of time believed that each person has a spirit that continues on after death; they made tombs for the deceased and brought food offerings to the chapel of the tomb ("Statue of Memi and Sabu”, 2015). It is here that the role of a statue becomes clear. A spirit, they believed, needs a home and the home is the statue they have made for it.

This sculpture represents Bodhisattva Maitreya. Bodhisattvas are knowledgeable characters who defer their sanctification to support all sentient individuals (Rambelli, 207). Unlike other Buddha statues the Bodhisattva is an invented character, not a replica of an exact character to Buddha. Bodhisattvas have several of those attributes of Christian benefactors (Gresham and Dunham, 400). They are sympathetic characters who assist congregants. Contrary to saints; nonetheless, they are not affiliated with historical individuals, hagiographies, or suffering.

In the photo you will see a boy drinking from a water-whose with a bucket in his hand while the girl is patting his back. In this picture, I observed a women making sure the man is taking care of since he is the provider for the family. Also, I see a man being selfish. My view has the being selfish is displaying although the women may not been outside or something the woman deserves the respect since she is home doing domestic chores. Furthermore, I see the man has being selfish considering it is respectful for the woman to get the first drink considering she is the “woman” of the house. The picture plays both was. I was shocked in seeing statues like this in