Similarities Between Much Ado About Nothing And The Crucible

1186 Words5 Pages
“Where there is no human connection, there is no compassion. Without compassion, then community, commitment, loving-kindness, human understanding, and peace all shrivel. Individuals become isolated, the isolated turn cruel, and the tragic hovers in the forms of domestic and civil violence.” - Susan Vreeland, author of Girl in Hyacinth Blue. In William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, relationships within the communities demonstrate the need for human connection, whether it be in 1692 Salem, Massachusetts, or 16th century Messina, Italy. Both Elizabeth Proctor and Hero are cast out from their communities after being falsely accused of committing a serious crime. Although they bear superficial similarities, the differences among the relationship between Hero’s community’s response to her being accused and the relationship between Elizabeth being accused and how her community responded to this are pronounced. One major difference between the two relationships is the truth behind each response to each accusation. First, we must establish that a community is not defined to only the people around someone. Each person is a part of their own community, and it’s important to discuss how they handled being accused. Elizabeth Proctor’s approach to being accused of witchcraft and Hero’s approach to being accused of cheating are literally, and in more ways than one, opposites. For example, Hero’s response to being accused was faking death,

More about Similarities Between Much Ado About Nothing And The Crucible

Open Document