Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

The United States left the Articles of Confederation behind for a new more adapted constitution in 1788 due to more than one reason, however a main reason for the switch had to do with the power of the federal government. There would be some Libertarians that would hold the Articles to be the symbol of American freedom at its peak, however there were those that would later be known as Federalists that saw the Articles as a failure due to the lack of strong central government powers within the articles. The many differences between the two documents were each important in there own respect, the first one that come to mind would be the power to levy taxes, under the articles Congress could request that States pay taxes, but under the

Towards the end of the Revolutionary War, the people felt they needed a document to secure their independence from Britain. This document was the Articles of Confederation. Shortly after that, a new document was formed to what we know as the Constitution of the United States. These documents were similar but more different at the same time with each other, and each granted specific powers to the national government.

Unfortunately for the National Government, Congress did not have any power to collect taxes from people in each individual state. The Congress could ask for money, but could not by any mean force states to pay them. The National Government greatly needed money to cover expenses and debts. Congress could not pay the Nation’s debt, which meant they could not provide much needed

The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation are the same in ways, but they are also, both different. Both of them founded our Government systems, but only one system still remains today. Both systems have their flaws, but also have their advantages. Without the Articles, there would be no Constitution, and the United States would be under the control of a tyrant. The Articles lead us to war, and separated us from Great Britain and now are our own country.

The articles of confederation and the constitution have many things in common yet if one doesn't come to the agreement the other one can’t proceed to make a decision. There is where the conflict starts because if one of the decision is not what the other wants there is a cause of dilemma. As an example, voting in congress. In the articles of confederation there is only one vote per state vs in the constitution it is one vote per representative, or senator.

The Articles of Confederation created many problems to the new government, after the Revolutionary War. It contained a weak national government and a strong state government. After the Revolutionary War, many colonists still feared Parliament and the monarchy they were once ruled by. Therefore, they created the Articles of Confederation with a weak national government and gave all the power to the states. But, many individuals did not favor the Articles of Confederation because it gave the states equal representations, no matter how big the state, and did not give the national government the ability to tax. Therefore, the ratifying of the Constitution took place. In this new Constitution, Framers wanted to create a new nation. With a separation of powers, and a new system of checks and balances between each branch. The new Constitution, expelled all of the problems within the Articles of Confederation. But, it did not include the secure liberties that the colonists had fought for. Therefore, the Bill of Rights was proposed in order to secure our blessings of liberty and to ensure that the colonists will never chant, “no taxation without representation,” ever again.

The articles also did not have the power to tax, this made it very hard to do anything as well. This was because in order to print money, make a postal system, or create a army; money is needed. In this form of government all states only got one vote no matter how big or small the state. One thing the federal government could do, was make treaties as well as have ambassadors and declare war.

The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution are two documents that outlined the fundamental principles of the United States. The Articles of Confederation as written first and ratified in 1781. It was then replaced by The Constitution in 1789. They have similarities such as establishing it as The United States of America. However, they do have many differences. Three of these differences are voting in Congress, terms of legislative office, and the Executive branch of government.

Anti-Federalists believed that a bill of rights was crucial to keep individual liberties. Congress received the proposed Constitution on September 20. It then voted to send the document to the state legislatures for the ratification process.

Anti-federalists feared that this new government would closely resemble the tyranny of King George which the colonies had originally gone to war with for independence. This was expressed clearly by the delegate Patrick Henry in a speech he made in which he stated, “...out rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished… The rights of the conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press… are rendered insecure,” (Doc. 4). While these fears were certainly not unfounded it was clear that there were provisions that could be made to fully protect the rights of the people. This was done by the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution which rendered to the most prominent Anti-federalist argument moot.

They used the Bill of Rights as a compromise that brought everyone together, so that all thirteen states ratified the constitution. Anti-Federalists largest concern was that there was not Bill of Rights written within the Constitution. A Bill of Rights is a list of rights that the common man is entitled to, that are written within the laws of the government. Many Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that a Bill of Rights would be pointless because they already distributed the powers within the government so tightly, that there would be no way for the government to abuse people’s powers. This being said they came to the conclusion that if all the states ratified the new Constitution, then they would amend it and create a Bill of Rights.

Although these documents were used at different times in the history of the U.S, they have some things in common and they also differ in other aspects. One difference between the Articles of Confederation and the constitution is that in the Articles of Confederation, states are sovereign, this is not the case with the constitution because it presents people of the United States as sovereign, and in addition, divides sovereignty between the central government and the states (Farrand, 2000). The difference here is that having sovereign states denies people the sovereignty while having people and the whole nation as sovereign gives people the sovereignty and the ability to exercise their sovereignty per the constitution. Farrand (2000)

The simple difference between the Articles of Confederation and US Constitution is that the articles were not strong enough to hold our young nation together. The articles operated the US as separate states. Under the articles, it was very difficult to pass laws since the requirement of 9 out of the 13 states ' approval was needed for ratification. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The members of the Constitutional Convention signed the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787 in

The Articles of Confederation were somewhat like the constitution, we have today. They served as a governing tool from 1781 until 1787(“Articles of Confederation”). The Articles of Confederation were called for by the Second Continental Congress. When they were called, the articles were questionable and very unsteady as to what the rules were. As the Articles of Confederation were underway, they would bind the 13 colonies into one nation(“Articles of Confederation”). After so many issues with the Articles of Confederation also the time we were in, which was right during the Revolutionary war; Congress no longer had the power of the people, and could no longer in force the states to do what they are expected of (“Articles of Confederation”).

In attempting to limit the power of the central government, the Second Continental Congress created one without sufficient power to govern effectively, which led to serious national and international problems. The greatest weakness of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation was its inability to regulate trade and levy taxes. “Sometimes the states refused to give the government the money it needed,