Similarities Between The Stranger And Waiting For Godot

The interrelationship between “The Overcoat,” written by Nikolai Gogol, and “Gogol,” written by Jhumpa Lahiri, may not be apparent at first, but with the help of “My Two Lives,” also written by Jhumpa Lahiri, one can see that both “The Overcoat” and “Gogol” are connected by ties that hold them together. Although Gogol and the speaker in “My Two Lives” share similar backgrounds and can directly relate to each other, Akaky can also connect to Lahiri and Gogol because all they all yearn for acceptance from those around them. One point of comparison is the practice of naming connects Akaky, from “The Overcoat”, and Gogol together by having similar practices. Another similarity between all three works is that each main character questions their identity, eventually overcoming their struggle of being seen as different.

Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, written in 1818, proves itself to be a literary classic with an interesting and insightful take on isolation and how one relates to the universe that only adds to the already flowing and immersive storyline. Meanwhile, The Stranger, written by Albert Camus in 1946, creates a peculiar atmosphere surrounding the character Meursault with his blunt attitude, lack of any emotion, and how through his eyes the world seems tangibly black and white. Both literary works utilize different techniques to demonstrate how the characters go through hazardous journeys of sole crushing isolation to find their place within the universe.

Later on he commits the crime of shooting an arab man, whom was the brother of his friends ex-partner. Yet again he showed no emotion whatsoever even after what he did. Since he had already had a bad reputation for not mourning his mother’s death, not feeling sorry for killing a man made it all worse. No one felt pity for him whatsoever, not even his lawyer who was suppose to be on his side. Meursault is considered a threat because of his lack of moral feelings www.sparknotes.com. He is found guilty and sentenced to prison, where in time he learns to accept himself, and his way of viewing life, and for the first time feels happy.

The news of his mother’s death should have some kind of emotional effect on Meursault, but he seems to not be phased at all, as if he had instead just learned that it was going to rain later in the day. He is reversed and rather quiet throughout the vigil and the funeral. Does not once shed a tear or present the emotion of grief or sadness. To him, life means at some point in time, death. It’s only natural and quite inevitable. He knew this was going to happen, whether sooner or later and logically there is no reason for it to upset him.

The way life is presented in “OMAM” there is brotherhood and the characters work together to fulfill a dream of theirs, George and lennie are hard working men looking for a job and they are dedicated to get their own land and they want to succeed , In “The Strangers” human existence in life does not matter just like how Meursault acts he doesn’t really have a life goal and just goes with the flow of life and Meursault is just a passive character that is clueless to what is happening around him and is a insensitive person. In “OMAM” and “The Strangers”, human existence is portrayed differently by murder, values and society.

The atomic bomb signaled not only the commencement of the Cold War, but also a political divide between the communist ideologies of the Soviet Union and the democracy of the Western world. A fear of communism behind the Iron Curtain and nuclear annihilation spread throughout the US, while existential views regarding the meaning of life arose. Through their texts, composers subverted dominant Cold War paradigms to …….. ATQ……. Samuel Beckett’s modernist existential play ‘Waiting for Godot (Godot) (1953)’ is a philosophical questioning on the purpose of human existence, and the nature of scientific development. In response to the existential angst following WW2, Beckett uses the conventions of Absurdist theatre to examine philosophical

After reading both the poem “Aubade” by Phillip Larkin and the play Waiting for Godot by Samuel Becket, I notice common themes of waiting and suffering, however in “Aubade” the man is alone thinking about his life and in Waiting for Godot the two main characters wait together and encounter a couple other people. In both stories I think that the characters are just waiting to die. They both mention the fact that death is an option and inevitable. In Waiting for Godot the two main characters Vladimir and Estragon even contemplate committing suicide more than once. Whereas in “Aubade” the man fear’s dying and reflect on the fact that everyday that we wake up we are one day closer to our death.

Meursault from the very beginning has showed next to know emotion and it is very evident that he has an exesentolist view on life. We have watched the Meursault show no emotion

A novel unlike any other, The Stranger by Albert Camus, portrays a very intriguing protagonist. Meursault can be analyzed in many different ways. He shows a lack of emotion in his life. The author depicted a character that is different from other protagonists in many ways. To learn about Meursault, the reader must dig deep as he is more than a surface level person. In Camus’ novel, Meursault focuses more on the physical things in life rather than the social ones.

In The Stranger, author Albert Camus challenges societal beliefs related to morality and religion. The main character, Meursault, does not experience emotion as the majority of society does. He is seemingly unbothered by his mother’s death, which many around him find disturbing. Meursault is entertained by the simple things in life, and does not appear emotionally attached to much of anything. His apathetic behavior is ultimately his downfall.

The two works are written in very different styles, but each has its own unique quality that adds to the overall success of the works themselves. Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot is a play, and is thus written with stage directions and dialogue instructions, as it is meant to be both a piece of literary mastery and a wonderful stage experience. It is this traditional play structure that counterbalances the more modern thematic

The periods of silence in Waiting for Godot are moments in which the characters realize where there is no certainty, there can be no definite meanings and words are just futile nonsense. No matter how much they use language, how long they talk to each other or what they talk about, silence will eventually fall on them like a haunting cloud, reminding them that they are no more than two tramps who are waiting for someone to redeem them.

Waiting for Godot, written by Samuel Beckett, is a tragicomedy about two men waiting for a person or thing named Godot. The play entitles two contrasting pairs of characters, Vladimir and Estragon, Pozzo and Lucky. These sets of characters differ greatly and they create effect of humanity. The main difference between the pair’s relationships would be their dependency on each other, their level of compatibility, and their development throughout the play. Furthermore, both

If hope does not exist, Vladimir and Estragon will never fulfill their desires. Throughout the boy’s appearance, Vladimir continues to interrogate him, asking him several questions about the mysterious figure that is Godot. Asking the boy about Godot, Vladimir asks, “What does he do, Mr. Godot? Do you hear me?” (106), to which the boy merely replies as “He does nothing, Sir” (106). Thus, the futile nature of hope is depicted through Beckett’s use of symbolism. As Godot symbolizes hope, and the boy stated that “He (Godot) does nothing...” (106), this hints the redundant existence of hope. Rather, it is merely something individuals rely on to keep living, as for the case of Vladimir and Estragon, who continuously wait for Godot. While they contemplate suicide many times throughout the book, it is their motivation and continuous strive to wait for Godot that keeps them living to the next day. While “Godot” has failed Vladimir and Estragon many times, failing to show up to the exact spot that they believed they would meet him, they keep on waiting. Their strive and motivation is depicted as Vladimir says, “Tell him... Tell him you saw me and that... That you saw me. You’re sure you saw me, you won’t come and tell me to-morrow that you never saw me!”

In Waiting for Godot, Beckett often focused on the idea of "the suffering of being." Most of the play deals with the fact that Estragon and Vladimir are waiting for something to relieve them from their boredom. Godot can be understood as one of the many things in life that people wait for. Waiting for Godot is part of the ‘Theater of the Absurd’. This implies that it is meant to be irrational and meaningless. Absurd theater does not have the concepts of drama, chronological plot, logical language, themes, and recognizable settings. There is also a split between the intellect and the body within the work. Vladimir represents the intellect and Estragon the body, both cannot exist without the other.