Single Payer Health Care System

In the article, it says that more than thirty percent of Americans support this push to have a personalized plan. The Pew Research Center reported that 60% of the population said that the government should ensure health care coverage but 39% said that the government should not which brings up a question, where is the other 1% leaning. The influence of private investors, companies and government programs have completely taken over the health care system so the core roots of what was originally established have been somewhat lost. Pharmaceutical companies are very against the push to single-payer health care because it jeopardizes their profit off their patients. Looking at how the investors see Obamacare is that they get to control the prices of medications, they mandate how much a procedure may cost and it can fluctuate depending on where you want to seek care. The single-payer option completely discards the monopolies out of health care and also underpays physicians. "In a single-payer system," Dr. Michael Accad from San Francisco says, "planners decide arbitrarily what the payments should be, and payments fall because there are no competitors and no choice for providers to bid up payments." A study did show that primary care physicians received higher pay with Medicare rather than a centralized system such as Canada. Dr. Accad says that single-payer systems in Canada, the United Kingdom, and other developed

Currently the United States has the most expensive health care system in the world and some 45 million Americans are uninsured under the current health system, these numbers continues to grow. Using the theory of an Utilitarianism perspective and developing a single-payer system such as universal health care all Americans could enjoy equal access to quality health care. The single-payer system will provide tools to manage health spending more effectively and ensure health care for everyone. If the United States would follow the blueprint of other developed nations who have successfully implemented universal health care coverage it would protect citizens from high medical premiums, co-payments and give everyone access to equal health care. In the United States people go without health coverage, it is a problem that needs to be resolved, yet we remain one of the last developed countries to implement universal health care coverage. Despite efforts to enact polices for

With rising healthcare costs being distributed predominantly on workers or their companies, the economic responsibility is placed on the very people who need it the least: the job creators. If the economic responsibility of healthcare costs was shifted to the government, the private sector job creators could have more revenue to stimulate the economy with additional jobs, better wages, and improved worker benefits. The best way to shift this cost obligation is via a single-payer healthcare system. A single-payer would make sure all citizens would be covered for all medical services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug, and medical supply costs.

The concept of a national single-payer health care system in America is far from a new one. In his journal, Dr. Jonathan Oberlander (2016) listed some of the proposals that have been made in the United States over the years. The first on his list was a bill that was created in 1943 with plans to establish a payroll tax-funded health insurance for the whole country; despite the

The future of healthcare resides in a single-payer system. Our country already has roughly fifty years of experience in this area under the Medicare program. By extending Medicare to all citizens we could ensure that all have the health coverage they need and that “everyone would make a financial contribution to Medicare for All” (Seidman, 2015). A single-payer system would also give the government the necessary leverage to negotiate better prices for care and prescription

There are currently sixteen countries with a single payer health care system. Single payer health care is a universal health care system where a single fund, rather than private insurers, pays for health care costs. There are nine countries with a two tier health care system. Two-tier health care is a government provided health care system that only provides basic medical necessities. The secondary tier of care exists for those who can purchase additional health care services to receive better quality and faster access. The last type of universal health care is mandatory health insurance, which makes it mandatory for every citizen of the country to purchase health insurance, whether is from a public or private insurer. There are eight countries that have this type of mandatory health insurance.( List of Countries with Universal Healthcare. True Cost Blog.) Just like everything else, there are also pros and cons to each of the three universal health care systems. The beneficial aspect of a Two Tier health care system is that the people that can afford to buy the better health care, get better health care. The negative aspect would then be that it is not an equal system for those who cannot afford the better care. With the single payer health care system the positive aspect is that every person gets the same

Since Sanders’ proposal has not yet provided a cost or financing estimate, criticism that single-payer systems have failed to control rising costs is a valid concern (Chen & Weinberg, 2017). Chen & Weinberg’s argument however, that single payer systems do not provide greater quality of care lacked statistical support (2017). Instead of providing evidence to dismiss a single payer system, the writers shifted the focus of the article to positive aspects of the U.S. health outcomes, such as patient centered care, specialty care, and innovation in medicine (Chen & Weinberg, 2017). Chen & Weinberg’s “The Sanders Single-Payer Plan Is No Miracle Cure” asserts that many foreign health systems provide

The mounting cost of healthcare makes it one of the foremost social and economic issues facing Americans today. Working families are confronting double digit increases in the costs of health care insurance. Higher premiums, deductibles, co-payments and high unemployment are taking their toll on U.S. workers. Consequently, 47 million Americans are currently un-insured- 8.7 million of whom are children. The high cost of doctor’s visits and prescription are forcing many to delay needed medical care, as health care cost balloons five times the rate of inflation. Will health care reform solve the

One example of a single-payer health care proposal that is already out is entitled “Physician’s Proposal” and was first published in New England Journal of Medicine in 1989 and then later in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1991. Under this plan every citizen would be covered for all necessary medical procedures including rehabilitative, long-term care, mental health care, dental care, prescription drugs, and medical supplies. Under the plan, every person would have access to local personalized care from the doctor of his or her choice. Physicians would still operate in the private sector; the whole scheme would provide for different payment structures for health care providers, this would be to minimize the disruption of the existing system. The scheme would be designed to prevent profit motives from affecting doctor’s decisions. Gone would be the incentives that HMOs give their doctors for NOT recommending treatment for patients.

The results revealed that, when it came to access to health care and ease of dealing with insurance problems, Americans had a poor experience compared to those of other countries. (Board 1) According to a poll created by The New York Times, about 37 percent of adults in America went the year without any form of recommended care due to costs. They did not see a doctor when sick and even failed to fill prescriptions. When we compare this with other countries (Britain: 4%, Sweden: 6%), then it becomes obvious that we need to change something about our system. (Board 1) “About 32 percent of consumers spent a lot of time on insurance paperwork or in disputes with their insurer over denials of payment for services they thought were covered.” (Board 1) The complexity of our insurance program can create problems such as this. With Universal health care, this problem would not exist, as everything necessary would already be covered by the government. Everyone in America should be entitled to health care, not just those who can afford it. Every person should be given access to treatment for their health issues, so that we can become a stronger, healthier nation. Health care should be free because the right to health should be something easily available to

First things first, why should the United States government create a national health care plan. Single-payer systems are the only way to achieve distributional efficiency in the United States health care system. “The United States tops all of the other countries in per capita expenditures.” (https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu) Yet, almost 45 million citizens go uninsured--

The concept of medicare (universal health insurance that is for old and disabled )was introduced in 1965 but this has been thwarted.A single payer concept mean that only one person will be responsible for paying instead of each and every person in the marketplace . some of reason behind it that Much of American public has been brainwashed that it requires higher costs and lower quality services and that extensive lobbying that is by health care providers and especially the insurance industry. Single payer concept can increase income taxes dramatically because it is funded in a large way by income taxes putting more burden on an already overburdened people. When people have to pay for medical they notice whether they need medical service or

There has always been a rise in cost of the health care thus various individuals are trying to understand the coverage options for their health coverage which has led them to search for various health care packages so as to save money. Amongst the controversial alternative that will enable citizens to safe money is the single payer health care. In this health package, citizens pays taxes for various health care services which are being issued by the government to every gentleman, lady as well as the child. For some times now, this system has been used in United

Health practitioner and health care facilities will receive bundle payments directly from the federal government in single payments. According to a study conducted in 1991 by the General Accounting Office, national health insurance (a single-payer plan) would save the United States more than 10% of all health care costs annually by reducing paperwork, and this saved money alone would adequately cover the uninsured and provide better long-term care, home care, and medication coverage for the entire population (McDermott, 1994).

Do we save billions of dollars or do we spend billions of dollars providing long-term care for avoidable chronic diseases. With the implication of the National Health Care Plan, we will no longer use the Band-Aid approach to health care. The emergency room festering with germs and patients will no longer be the Doctor of choice for the uninsured and underinsured. Preventative health care will be available to those in need. For those who chose not to insure a penalty will be paid. The quality of care and life will improve for millions. Clinics for the poor and uninsured will not be the only source of care, with very little and inferior products that more often than not are donated. The National Health Care Plan will allow us the opportunity to remove some of the Band-Aids we have put health. Americans will receive the quality health care they deserve.