Why Single Sex School?
Single sex schools are the best way of education and vital for our children in order for them to be taught in an environment that is away from distractions and to be more successful, focused and emotionally stable. There are several reasons which shows that single sex schools are important and why it’s the best way for good education.
The first reason is that boys and girls are not equal and develop at different times and speeds; therefore they should be taught separately. Acording to Gilbert (2007), Aacademic planners and school superintendents in the 1960’s had this foundamental assumption; they used to think that separate means unequal, so fearing that they would be unfair, provoking inequality and sexual
…show more content…
The second reason why single sex schools are the way to go is that boys and girls distract each other from their education, especially in adolescence as their sexual and emotional sides develop. They spend too much time trying to impress or sexually harassing each other especially boys toward girls. Academic competition between the sexes is unhealthy and only adds to the unhappiness and anxiety among weaker students. As Trichia Kelleher, a school principle, argues “rather than girls defining themselves by their interests, they define themselves by what the boys think of them or what other girls think boys think of them”. Furthermore, John Silber (2002), President of Boston University, declared that his university would prioritize male applications in order to even up the student composition and ensure the male population did not become ‘ungentlemanly’ towards women due to their numerical inferiority. John as a preident of Boston saw how females can be a sexual distraction towarad males in class rooms and tried to slove that by admitting more males to the university. A single-sex environment is therefore a space where (children) can learn without feeling pressurized by the other sex.
As odd it may sound, some people argues that children need to be exposed to the opposite sex in preparation for later life; this fact should be further evaluated and analysed logically. Nobody in this world comes without parents, and as children we can get
Hutchison and Mikulski argue that students tend to concentrate better when boys and girls are separated. “Both principals and teachers believed that the main benefits of single-sex schooling are decreasing distractions to learning and improving student achievement.” However, single sex education does not provide socialization. Educating students in single sex classes limits both genders from interacting and working together. One day they will coexist with the opposite sex but how are single sex schools/classes going to prepare the student to interact with the opposite sex when they are
Two Works Cited Victoria Bissell Brown's introduction to Twenty Years at Hull-House explains the life of Jane Addams and her commitment to insight social change to problems that existed during the turn of the 20th century. As a reaction to the hardships of a changing industrial society, Addams decided to establish a settlement house in the West side of Chicago to help individuals who had suffered from the cruelties of industrialization. Rejecting the philosophies that stemmed from the Gilded Age, such as social Darwinism and the belief that human affairs were determined by natural law, Addams was a progressive who wanted government to be more responsive to the people.
However, despite the many advantages, there are also down-sides of single-sex schools and education. Kristin Stanberry, a writer and editor specializing in parenting, education, and consumer health/wellness issues, argues that there are many who believe that gender separation is not wise as there aren’t many instructors who are able to adapt their teaching methods and understandings to only one gender. This could lead to a worse development and achievements, the exact opposite of what single-ed’s aim is. Even more, maybe the greatest counter-argument is that this way of education promotes discrimination and sexism. This is what many people believe, among them being the American Civil Liberties Union which even filed a suit against a school in Kentucky for organizing single-sex classes in their institution (Single-Sex Education: the pros and cons). By attending a single-sex school, people may develop shyness and have problems interacting with the other sex in the future, for there was no precedent during their education.
The special aspects of the National Honors Society (NHS) is the helping of both the students that are in the program to excel above their accomplishments, as well as getting in touch with their community around them. This is the reason why I want to be in this elite organization, it may guide me into achieving my goal in life, which is going to the University of Texas in Austin and receiving my bachelors in Dialysis nursing. By being a part of this, I will become a more matured, sociable person in life.
From an early age I have frequently questioned who I am. I, obviously, am the daughter of Chris Dudley and Donna Terrill. I am a quiet girl from South Carolina with brown hair and glasses. These things make me who I am, but at the same time do not. Over the years I have come to realize that who I am really isn’t about who I am right now or who I am physically, but about who I want to be.
“Where is Andy? This is his second day absent”, Mr. James asked Jake at the beginning of class. “Oh Mr. James, Andy said he wants to drop out and start looking for a job because he knows one day he will find a wife who will have to cook and clean the house while he works. You know girls are not supposed to work Mr. James”, Jake remarked. Mr. James glanced to the right of the classroom and hears Steven and Christopher debating on the new disease girls have called the “cooties”. “Steven and Christopher you know there is no such thing as the cooties, right guys?” Mr. James implies. “But there is Mr. James. All of the boys around the school are talking about it and I am terrified to catch the cooties,” Christopher responds. “Billy wake up”, Mr. James directed during 5th grade language. “I’m so bored Mr. James. This all boy class is not the reason I will do well in school or pay attention. Where are the girls?” Billy replied. Based on the situation in Mr. James 5th grade class, should more American elementary school students be taught in single-sex classrooms? Single-sex classrooms are not the reason for academic success and will not be a good educational decision for our future generations, therefore, public schools should not establish single-sex classrooms. Even though some people say single-sex classrooms is a smart decision for education, it can cause extreme sexism and is not the true reason for academic success.
Researchers suggest that some sex-segregation proponents are manipulating school boards and segregated education. This unawareness in turn, often causes schools to rely on brain research. (Cantalupo 730) It seems beyond dispute that boys and girls learn at different paces and in different ways. According to a
The programs that seperate the sexses in schools are usually based on very questionable science about the differences of girls’ and boys’ brains during development and learning, along with gender stereotypes. The American Civil Liberties Union’s article, ‘Sex-Segregated schools; Separate and Unequal’ says,” Advocates tell teachers that: Boys need a competitive and confrontational learning environment,
When it comes to the classroom, there are several differences between girls and boys. There are physical differences in the way their brains work, differences in the room temperature that is best for boys and girls, and differences in how girls and boys respond to various tones of speech (Sax, 2006). While girls prefer soft-spoken teachers, Sax (2006) notes that boys prefer to be spoken to “loudly and in short, direct sentences with clear instructions” (p. 195). According to Sax (2006), “the ideal ambient temperature for boys is about 69 degrees and about 75 degrees for girls” (p. 193-194). Further differences involve how boys and girls learn. McNeil states that “boys may learn better under pressure and when allowed to move around...while girls may perform better in group situations and with a lot of encouragement” (McNeil, 2008). Because of these many differences, it would stand to reason that boys and girls would benefit from being in separate classrooms. According to Hughes (2007), “the teacher would be able to concentrate on the learning-styles of each sex and use the styles to bring out the academic best in each students. Lessons and activities could be designed with a single-sex in mind” (p. 11). As Principal John Fox states, “the single-sex environment enables you to actually focus on the particular needs of each gender, and those needs socially and
Single-sex schools are motivated by religious ideas that propagate sex segregation and also believe that different sexes behave and learn in different ways and can do better in a
On September 22, 2015 an article was published on Global News, which was entitled “‘Girl talk’ or ‘career exploration’? Texas school’s gender segregation peeves parents.” In this article, Patricia Kozicka discusses the controversial issue regarding Borchardt Elementary School in Texas, in which students in grade four and five were divided into separate classes based on their gender (Kozicka, 2015). According to the article, it is reported that, at the beginning of this school year, females and males would be placed in separate classes in which they would focus on different curriculums (Kozicka, 2015). Specifically, that females would focus on confidence and relationship building skills, whereas, males would focus on career and future aspirations (Kozicka, 2015). The principle cleared up the issue with an email stating that the class would be split based on gender, however, both would still receive the same curriculum only with different schedules of the lessons and more emphasis on particular topics (Kozicka, 2015).
People have joined together to make public education districts, offer single sex education for those to benefit from. “Children learn in different ways. For some, single sex classrooms make all the difference” (8). Boys and Girls grasp information better in gender based surroundings, especially in core classes: math and science. Perhaps, students will retain focus in what is being taught and will become less distributed knowing they’re in same gender classes, thus succeeding.
Although single-sex education may seem to have many benefits for both genders, together and separately, there are relatively none that are proven. However, it is proven that each gender’s social skills will be severely underdeveloped from not having any interaction with one another. According to Seattlepi,”...When students are segregated by sex, they miss opportunities to work together and develop vital social skills” (Jen Saunders, The Disadvantages of Schools Segregated by Sex). This just proves how much students will be impacted by the segregation of genders in their schools and classes, and also according to Seattlepi,”Gender-segregated schools produce young men and women who don’t know how to communicate with one another and leave lasting impressions that one gender is better than another” (Jen Saunders, The
In her essay “ Single-Sex Schools: An Old Time Idea Whose Time Has Come,” Diane Urbina Argues that it would be more beneficial if we had single-sex schools. The myth is debunked is that boys and girls are restricted by nature in relation to what they can learn and how fast. Rather, their brain development is restricted, and so they can only learn so much in a certain time period. Boys learn literacy skills more slowly. Girls have trouble with math. Therefore, boys and girls who attend
In a traditional setting, boys and girls are mixed and learn together in a classroom. The traditional setting offers pros, like the preparement for real society in which these genders will continue to mix. A non-traditional setting will produce non-traditional results in which children may better their education. Single sex education with specialized styles for each gender, an example of a non-traditional setting, are beginning to show evidence of a better fit for students. Instead of a single male dominated classroom, separate rooms with different teachers may show better results in academic potential. A wide range of evidence shows certain conditions benefit females more than males and vice versa. The opposite gender can also be