Situational Leadership Analysis

There are five conflict-handling styles: Forcing Style, Collaborating Style, Compromising Style, Avoiding Style and Accommodating Style. The compromising style “refers to behaviors at an intermediate level of cooperation and assertiveness. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 392) ” The person using is style tries to meet a goal by give-and-take. The accommodating style “refers to cooperative and unassertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 393) ” The person using this style tries to accomplish a goal by using unselfish acts that will promote cooperation in others by complying with their wishes. The collaborating style “refers to high levels of cooperative and assertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 391) ” The person using this style is using a win-win approach to working with others and handling conflict. When the CEO of General Hospital, Mike Hammer first attempted to control physician-driven cost he used the collaborating style by trying to convince the Director of

While finding a good balance, conflicts will most certainly arise. Conflict resolution strategies must be utilized, for the team to be effective and meet the goals and objective of their assignment. These conflicts may be more evident in certain types of teams more so than in others. Conflict is common when working in teams. Its is important to have team meeting in order to lay out potential problems and disagreements and prepare to support the teams final decision. (Weinstein, 2007)

The collaborative style views conflicts as problems to be solved and finding creative solutions that satisfy all the parties’ concerns. You don’t give up your self interest; you dig into the issue to identify the underlying concerns, test your own assumptions, and understand the views of others. Collaboration takes time and if the relationship among the parties is not important, then it may not be worth the time and energy to create a win-win solution. However, collaboration fosters respect, trust, and builds relationships. To make an environment more collaborative, address the conflict directly and in a way that expresses willingness for all parties to get what they need.

I completed Thomas-Kilmann questionnaire in class of Managerial Communication as a part of activity. This questionnaire helped me to recognize my conflict management style which is “Collaborating” as I chose collaborating approach to answer most of the questions that is 9 out of 30. This means I want to solve the conflict or problem rather than ignoring it. I chose competing method only for 3 question. I think, I need to start take stand for the things I believe correct because otherwise it will become really difficult for me to survive in work place where everyone have to compete

Competition is when an individual “achieves a victory through force, superior skill, or domination”. This type of approach fails to address the root cause of the conflict and suppresses the desires of other conflicting individuals; therefore resulting in future conflicts over the same issues. Collaboration is when all conflicting parties recognize something is wrong and needs attention. This is an ideal approach. When collaborating, groups respect each others ideas, opinions, and suggestions, and understand each others point of view. This allows group members to eventually accept the logic of a different point of view and accept that logic; therefore resulting in a consensus. Compromise is when each group gives up something of value to the other group. This is an appropriate approach when: there is insufficient time, issue not worth time or energy, or there’s no realistic or easy agreement.

The first academic journal that I viewed was Leadership Styles of Effective Project Managers: Techniques and Traits to Lead High Performance Teams by Melissa DuBois, John Hanlon, Jodi Koch, Betty Nyatuga, and Nathan Kerr. A summary of the article, the authors analyze the important qualities of leadership and determine their positive impact, which can benefit project managers in any industry and, therefore, increase project success. They identified two leadership styles: Situational leadership and Transactional leadership. A few of these leadership traits include: team building, setting clear relations and roles between project members, openness, self-confidence, organization, and clearly defining project successes, revaluating when necessary. The traits of organization, managerial competence, emotional competence, openness to experiences, communication, inspiration, investigative, enterprising and entrepreneurialism, demonstrated the highest correlation with project success. These leadership styles and traits were examined and analyzed to determine the extent they contribute to the construction, execution, and closure of the project. The methods for locating and identifying resources, for this project, involved accessing electronic databases provided by the libraries at Drexel University. Each team member conducted a literature

The four styles within the situational leadership mode are directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating. Once a leader has put together the most qualified team for the goals, directing comes in to learn how each member will be the most productive in the task assigned. A leader has to make sure that a task is assigned to the person who will enjoy achieving the task. If not, this could lead to low motivation and low morale, with a chance of failing the task at hand (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). Being a leader means having knowledge in all aspects of the tasks that needs to be done to reach the end goal successful. The leader has to coach each individual to make sure each task is being done correctly. The leader needs to be involved in all

Within this paper, I will evaluate myself and the rest of my group on how overall our leadership project went and the pros and cons of each member within my group. The members of my group include myself, Michael Williams, Divya Reitz, Zack Benner, and Travis Geidroc. Reviewing and looking at how well each student worked individually will help show where things went wrong or went well throughout the planning of the leadership project.

“Effective leaders need to be flexible, and must adapt themselves according to the situation.” Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard

When it comes to Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King, and our own President Obama, how did they become such powerful people? What do they have that the average person does not? Well, that answer is leadership skills. They did not know when they were born that they were going to become big leaders, but as they were growing up they learned what skills it took to allow them to become different from everyone else and become leaders.

The coaching style incorporates high levels of directive behavior paired with high levels of supportive behavior. This style encourages the leader to communicate how to meet goals while meeting the socioemotional needs of their subordinates. An extension of the directing style, the leader still makes all final decisions in regards to goal setting and accomplishment.

In simple terms, a situational leader is an individual who can use different leadership styles based on the situation. Blanchard and Hersey created a model for Situational Leadership in that allows you to analyze the needs of the situation you're dealing with, and then adopt the most appropriate leadership style. Many of us do this anyway in our dealings with other people: we try not to get angry with a nervous colleague on their first day; we chase up tasks with some people more than others because we know they'll forget otherwise. The model doesn't just apply to people in leadership or management positions: we all lead others at work and at home. The ability to vary your approach is key in being able to manage vast amounts of people.

In Organizational Leadership Capstone, we have taken a greater look at the styles and understanding of the leadership theories this semester. Through our class readings, I have discovered the good and bad of leadership and management along with a clear understanding of the relationship between leaders and their followers. In addition, one thing that I found very interesting in the course was the breakdown of the different types of followers. Although, my leadership skills has been outstanding, I have gained a lot of insights to enhance my ability to lead.

Dissatisfaction with behavioral theory of leadership led researchers to search for another solution. This led to the recognition of situational factors as important factors for the success of leadership. The recognition that effective leadership involves matching leadership behaviors and strategies to particular situational contexts was the most important advance in leadership research (Chemers, 1997).

The five conflict styles would include: “competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating” (Griffith & Dunham, 2015, p.57). Competing occurs when there are not many resources. This approach is considered a “win-lose”; A person may choose this approach on his own without cooperating with anyone else (J.D., 2011).