From a situational leadership standpoint, I generally find myself able to adapt to the specific situation. A strength would be the ability to utilize supportive and directive when it comes to the goal at hand. A weakness that I have would be around which person I’m utilizing it with. I’m very aware of my audience and have a good handle if I should be directive in my communication or need to support that individual. Generally, this is with my immediate team. When it comes to anyone not on my immediate team I tend to always take the directive approach. I’ve always viewed the situation, and in some ways, created an in group and out group for specific tasks. There are the people that will be able to assist me and my team in getting the job done …show more content…
Down the road as teams, projects and companies change the people that were on the outside has viewed me as a direct, less political, type of person that can get the job done. It suites me in my current sales role, but if I decide to take a management path I will have to change the views of people that have either never been part of my team or are the executives. Another area that has been a strength is through path-goal. Since I can be directive, supportive and achievement oriented I’m usually viewed as a person that can hit his targets. When it comes to the team, I can assess their strengths and weaknesses to achieve a goal and many times know what obstacles need to be removed to make them a better team player. When things are slow, I’ve found that I take more of a supportive role in training team members on areas they struggle with to make them a more well-rounded individual. Granted this is self-fulfilling because I’m hoping when the work load increases they can produce more. In the end, if I can get a full team of competent individuals I can take more of a participative role, focus on my work and trust that their work will be held to my …show more content…
I’ve mainly worked from home, traveled alone to client’s offices and had teams that supported me, but never reported me, in my last role I had a team of 16. Most of what I’ve been exposed to is transactional. If I hit a specific goal, I or my team, would receive a specific reward. Compensation has always been a clear driver, but another perk from transactional was the fact management left me alone. In some years, I would only talk to my bosses at the 3-4 major conferences a year, if I was hitting my goals. This, in most instances, put me on an island, but it is one of the job perks that I like a lot. Over the years this has suited me very well in my separate roles. However, the individual contributor role is the life style I was looking for, but the transactional portion has separated me from different possible career paths. Being outside the political environment people have only known me as having one of the more cohesive teams and hitting our targets. To try and move into any type of management role would be starting from scratch. The only time transformational leadership comes into play is with my immediate teams. My old role had the 16 different members where my current role only has two. With either size team, keeping them motivated, supporting and stimulating all had to come through influence because they don’t report to me. I had to get them excited to do their best work for the
A State Representative, Randy Richards, organized a press conference coveting to sway a proposal for a bill to a avert state agencies and other health care providers from offering prenatal care to undocumented immigrants and billing the cost to Medicaid (Sharp, 2011, p. 72). In the press conference, he accuses undocumented immigrants from coming to the United States to take advantage of the Medicaid system by taking services away from the American Citizens who pay into the system with their taxes. When the floor was opened to the press to ask question or to elaborate on the proposal for the bill his answer were very vague or he eluded the question by saying, “…That is not the point…” (Sharp, 2011, p. 72). The Executive Director of the Health Care Authority, Mike Foley, decides to hold a press conference later that day to clear the air with factual information and providing laws stating, health care cannot be denied to anyone in search of preventative or medical attention. He articulates prenatal care for illegal women cost less than a $1000.00 and when the child is born, they become a natural American Citizen and how they deny service to an American. If these preventative services were denied during the pregnancy and the child is born with a serious medical condition it will cost the state over $130,000.00 (Sharp, 2011, p. 73) to treat the child for the rest of their life. Randy Richards, the representative, became infuriated and took great offense that Mike Foley, the
This afternoon I had a conversation with Matthew De Jesus’s grandmother regarding Matthew not finishing his exit ticket on time, so I kept him in UD. I also let his grandmother know that Matthew received a correction in Science because he was being disruptive in class by humming. This I called mom earlier in the afternoon to follow up about the conversation that I had with his grandmother.
Situational leadership style would be the contingency model I prefer to use on the job. Due to being a Soldier in the military, the insight of being able to understand different followers is a must. Therefore, the leadership style must adjust to meet those needs. In order for the insight to function one must be flexible to move seamlessly from one type of leadership to the other. Also, there is the trust. If the trust isn’t there, there are no followers. You must gain the trust and confidence of the followers to be able to influence them. Being able to solve problems will be always be there due to multiple reason if it is from the followers or from the mission. Lastly, coaching a major factor of training the Soldiers to accomplish the
The situational leadership theory proposes that the leader’s style of leadership should be flexible and contingent on the staff’s developmental level including the willingness and capability to accomplish a task (Walter, 1980). Powell in his role as Secretary of State demonstrated situational leadership by recognizing the deficits of the state office and needs of the troops as well as officials in the office. Providing support to the troops and office staff was critical to making necessary changes. Powell provided clarity on the mission for the troops by being directive about changes needed and empowered staff to move toward career advancement (Harris, 2004) .
I will be discussing four situational leadership components- telling, selling, participation, and delegation. I will explain which is my strongest of the four components and why. Next, I will explain which others do I have some ability to do. Finally, I will discuss where do I need help from others in my organization to ensure all the situations are addressed.
I love to help others win. I love watching others have success and helping to contribute to that success. I work well and cooperate with others. In my current position I occasionally face opposition and conflicts on how a process should be carried out. If my idea is not implemented and another idea works better I can get behind it one hundred percent. I have not always been this way, but I have learned to let matters slide that do not really matter one way or another. I promote the best possible outcome for everyone involved. I work with many different elements of our organization; moreover, I interact with many different types of people and personalities. I cooperate well with everyone, and I have been told this by many people on multiple occasions. I believe this is a strength that will propel me to succeed in any role.
The word leadership has a lot of meanings, but its meaning is unique to the person who is giving the definition. Leadership is the ability to guide, direct, and motivate others to accomplish a mission or task. It is the ability to make subordinates see their own potential in their abilities and supervisors recognize and respect it. Leaders are entrusted with building up those they lead to ensure the individual can one day assume the responsibility of leading others. It is for this reason that the situational approach style of leadership best describes my leadership style.
Fatimah is a 30-year-old woman who owns and manages her own fashion brand label and design company. She started her business 2005. In addition to managing her business, Fatimah is the mother of three adorable kids, ages 5, 7, and 9. In her fashion company, she heads a team of 26 employees ranging from tailors, salesperson, drivers, and secretaries. Fatimah supervises operations, coordinates her staff, and displays good leadership and communication skills. She also interacts regularly with clients and suppliers.
After researching several other leadership styles, I found that situational leadership is the leadership style most effective for myself. Situational leadership is different from most leadership styles because it is adaptable to every circumstance. While other leadership styles are very specific, situational leadership can be used to lead people that are not very knowledgable in a certain area and also people that might know more than you.
Leadership is a complex topic and researchers have spent a considerable amount of time trying to determine what makes them effective. While traditional research focused on the leader and their traits, contemporary research is focusing on many other variable, providing a more comprehensive understanding of what it to takes to be a leader. Individualized leadership is a concept that has gained momentum as of late. Daft (2015) describes individualized leadership as, “a leader that develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward them.” (p. 52). Another emerging study is that of the Situational Leadership model which
Leadership is an approach for a leader to guide, motivate, supervise, manage, and influence others in different situation to reach a goal. According to the Pettinger (2007), the leadership can be explained in several situations. First, the leaders have the responsible to provide vision and direction to the followers. Second, the leaders shall energise and motivate the followers. Third, the leaders shall set and enforce absolute standards of behaviour, attitude, presentation and performance.
Over the years, scholars and management theorists have cultivated several leadership styles that they have encouraged people to apply and try to implement. However, most of these theories have shown various short comings. Typically, none of these styles has proven to work best in diverse situations. In the late 1960’s, the Situational Leadership Model was developed. In this paper, I will discuss the details about the situational leadership model. In detail, the paper begins with a defined introduction of what the situational leadership model is about and an interpretation of its origination. An outline of the model will follow after which a discussion about the benefits and drawbacks of this model will shortly follow.
When I was in high school we had a special presenter come to teach us about leadership.
Leadership is an important factor within a business environment and often plays a significant role in achievement of organisational success (Landis, Hill & Harvey 2014). However, leadership is an art, therefore there is no simple formula for effective leadership (Hughes, Ginnett & Curphy 2015, p.33) and a leader’s effectiveness can often only be understood in the context of the leader-follower-situation interaction model.
Employees do know their job, but they are not trained to properly conduct the business.