Skylar Decision Making Case Study

Danville Airlines has created an ethical and legal dilemma by not being accurate, precise and clear on how they are doing medical testing, causing undue stress and potentially career-ending circumstances for David Reiger, one of their best pilots. What Danville did was illegal and unethical due to negligence. David Reiger has every right to sue them to continue flying, and the medical evidence suggests that the Huntington's disease gene can be dormant for decades before being active and changing a person's nervous system (Darden, 2004). The company has violated the 1974 Privacy Act, the Heath Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, and the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act. As is best practice with the nascent, emerging field of genetic testing, Danville did not warn Reiger of the testing taking place, did not get his permission, and didn't even have a process in place for dealing with pilots, whom the traveling public relies on for safe transport, when they are tested positive for these types of diseases (Murry, Wimbush, Dalton, 2001). Clearly Reiger would win any lawsuit, the collateral damage to Danville being the lack of oversight and gross negligence in managing health screening.

Mr. Morse will provide adequate data from all aspects of the intervention and reward expected behaviors. He will also support Marvin and Marvin’s mother in the hopes that Marvin will become successful at achieving his

United Methodist follows four Theological Task that we base our decision-making from. The following are the four Theological Task:

Intervention: Ms. Smalls (MHP), Santonias and Ms. Givens (MHS) discussed Santonias complying with the rules of the home. MHP and Santonias had a discussing about his NFL football team as a way to build rapport. MHP requests feedback on possible goals from Santonias and MHS for Individual Plan of Care. MHP, Santonias and MHS discuss and process an incident that happened at the school’s gym.

Action: MHP and MHS discuss Donovan’s behaviors in the home and community. MHP and MHS review monthly paperwork that is needs to be submitted. MHS and MHP complete a walk-through of Donovan’s bedroom and play room. MHP and MHP discuss upcoming medical appointments. MHP email Ms. Greene at the MUSC Foster Care Support Clinic to assist MHS with verifying upcoming medical appointments. MHP and MHS discuss MHS contact with Donovan’s DSS worker.

Discussion: Ms. Roger reported that Corey's Medicaid hasn't been reinstated, as a result, his therapy and all medical appointment is on hold. She stated that Corey has enough medication and is not at risk of running out. Ms. Roger expressed concern with Corey's Maladaptive behavior (substance Abuse), truancy and medication refusal. She asserted that Corey's addiction to this substance is affecting him significantly. Corey denied it, purported that he's not addicted to it but uses it as a coping mechanism. Corey stated that he's been absent multiple times from school because he's lethargic in the AM. Ms. Rogers indicated that his Maladaptive behavior is contributing to it. Ms (Family growth) informed Corey about their Substance abuse program

Ms. Smalls (MHP) provides MHS and Destiny support and encouragement at bi-weekly face to face visits. MHP, MHS and Destiny is establishing a meaningful relationship. MHP, MHS and Destiny practice managing emotions and communication in the bi-weekly face to face visits through positive interventions, role-play, and practicing of coping skills. MHP modeled the coping skills and interventions for Destiny and MHS at the bi-weekly visits. Destiny receives Behavior Modification services to alter reported negative behaviors.

Planned Interventions / Frequency / Responsible Party: 1. MHS will provide Autumn with resources for daily living and self-care skills to increase hygiene, sleep patterns, skin care, time management and chores weekly. 2. MHS will teach Autumn and model appropriate daily living behaviors in the home and community daily. 3. MHS will monitor praise Autumn for demonstrating learn skills without prompts weekly.

Lizzie and her mother were in a good mood when the QP arrived for the session.

Intervention: MHP and MHS discuss recent update from the adoption worker Ms. Davis. MHP, Samantha and MHS discuss ways to express feelings to maintain relationships. MHP and Samantha practice changing negative thinking about relationships. MHP and Samantha process behaviors that cause her biological family not to be able to care for her. MHP, Samantha and MHS discuss the different with supervision with current placement than with past placements.

Action: MHP introduced herself to Drayton. MHP and MHS discuss Drayton’s needs and scheduling a medical appointment at the MUSC Foster Care Clinic. MHP and MHS complete intake paperwork. MHS explain having the remainder of the paperwork to sign on Friday. MHP interacted with Drayton. Drayton had a limited use of words display frustration by walking away or throwing things across the room. MHS provide MHP the DSS worker information that dropped off Drayton to the home. MHP and MHS could reach the DSS worker to ask questions about the outcome of court.

Action: MHP and MHS discuss Clarence’s behaviors in the home and community. MHS provide MHP a report of Clarence interactions with peers in the home and community. Clarence had a haircut and appeared to gain weight. Clarence was smiling and respond top MHS redirection. MHP review Clarence treatment plan and explain how to sign the plan using the computer. MHP and MHS discuss services needed to complete SAFY requirements. MHS explain Clarence is adjusting to the home with minimal problems. Clarence demonstrated how to fold towels and MHS praise Clarence for following directions. MHP and MHS review setting up medical services for Clarence.

Jeremiah was observed yelling and screaming at his sisters that asked to participate in the session with him and said he cannot

Unfortunately, every consumer does not have the same access in making informed decisions. For example, the mentally ill and even prisoners are incapable of practicing or acting on their own beliefs. The mental state of an individual limits their autonomous decisions, as for prisoners the institution puts limitations on their choices. In this case, the determination of care and decisions of food come from the health care team for both the mentally ill and prisoners in regards to nutrition (Uusitalo 2011). The decision makers in charge of those consumers incapable of making decisions must provide a just decision for the consumer’s well-being in order to help them receive the correct nutritional value as

According to Provost and Fawcett (2013) data-driven decision making refers “the practice of basing decisions on the analysis of data rather than purely on intuition.” For Example, a seller could select the advertisement based on his long experience in that field or his eye for what will work. He can also do the selection on the analysis of data regarding how the people will react to different advertisements. In today’s organization, managers make a great effort to use data driven decisions because data-driven decision helps in gaining competitive advantage and it can be most interesting and transformable. A study from the MIT center for Digital Business found that the organizations driven most by data-based decision making had 4% higher productivity rates and 6% higher profits. (Rouse)