preview

Slavery Argumentative Analysis

Decent Essays

Ever since the beginning of time, black people have always been looked upon as the inferior race compared to the ever powerful white male. Since all these acquisitions have been made about these people, the whites have taken it under their power that they can own these human beings and control them to in any way they please because they believe it is their constitutional right to property. However, the white male has taken it to an extreme saying that another human being is their property to control. When the Founding Fathers were drafting the US Constitution, they knew the debate over slavery was a critical flaw in their newly founded nation, but chose not to abolish nor allow of this sinful act knowing that it would not be approved by the southern states. When Frederick Douglass and Jefferson Davis wrote their documents about slavery they both proved their by by saying the constitution either said it was okay or it was implied that it was constitutionally approved. …show more content…

The point that he used was how the Constitution gave people the right to life, liberty, and property and he stretched it a little and implied that by property it meant that each white male had the right to own another human, but Douglass thought and wrote about the complete opposite. Douglass believed that life, liberty, and property meant that each person had the right to live their life how they wanted to and not be controlled by someone else. One of the biggest problems between people was the debate over how much power the central government should have over how the people should live their lives. Douglass believed that slavery flourished when no other voices were going against it like the north or the central government. Where as Davis believes that it should be the central government's job to try and help slavery because that is the only way that it will finally

Get Access