Slavery During The 19th Century

During the 19th century slavery was a very prominent and controversial issue between the north and the southern states. In the South, most people believed that slavery was a profitable way of life and if the slavery was to be abolished it would then affect their economy. On the hand the northern had different opinions about slavery and intended to stop it. The fact that the perception were different between the two led to a very difficult situation in resolving the issue.

Prior to the 1820’s, the people of the United States had been struggling to find a way to solve their sectional tensions brought on by slavery in the south. The south had always had an economy based on agriculture that could not strive without their uses of slavery. They did not plan on ending slavery anytime soon, especially since it was really all they had to support themselves. They were against establishing an industrial based economy like the north had began to do in the 1820-1830’s. The real cause of the sectional tensions between the North and the South during the 1820’s-1860’s was not slavery itself, but how it affected each society so differently, and it was very challenging to find a compromise to suit

Between 1840 and 1860 many political issues, debates, and actions were inflamed by the presence of slavery. As America grew, both in population and in size, the South wanted more slave states and the North wanted more free states to increase their hold in politics and sway decisions in favor of what put them in a position for the greatest success. One important act that provoked the slavery dominated political world

As Americans were moving west to fulfill the Manifest Destiny and conquering new territories, new boundaries for the Union were having to be shaped. With the northern states having officially abolished slavery since 1804, the argument over which territories would be free or not was now coming into play. The North and South have had differing opinions regarding slavery for over sixty years, but with the topic being kept out of most, if not all, political debates the dispute never seemed to come to a head. After the

The challenge would be to decide whether the new territories would be slavery areas or not. Tensions were high over the expansion of slavery. Politicians did not deal impartially with the tensions, and the decisions were made based on the interests of the political parties. Aftermath, the decisions led to conflicts, inflame debates, political divisions, and the emergence of new political parties. In this conflictual moment lived between the Northerners (abolitionists) and the Southerners (pro-slavery), a fact in 1857 disheartened the abolitionists by the end of the

Slavery continued to cause major conflictions throughout the nation, especially between northern and southern states. Northerners and Southerners had two completely different views and insights on the issue of slavery. For most Northerners, they believed that slavery was wrong and it went against what the nation stood for; liberty and all men being created equally. However, there were some northerners who were antislavery and others (very few) were abolitionist. Although both sides opposed slavery, some individuals’ motives were self beneficial and really did not care so much for slavery while others believed in what America stood for and how it implies to everyone. Southerners on the other hand defended slavery, as it was their way of life.

During the late 1800’s there were turbulent times between the Northern and Southern States in America, one the vastest areas that was constantly being quarreled against one another is the usage of slavery. As slavery was the principal component within the Southern States, it provided the basis for many of the cash crops that were spread throughout. Whereas, many within the Northern States were firmly against the usage of slave and wanted to end this practice once and for all. This continuous incompatibility between slave states in the South and the free states in the North eventually ended up colliding into a Civil War. There were many aspects that led to this collision, such as; when America expanded into the western terrain after the Mexican-American

Stanford, the supreme court ruled that slaves were property, and that they weren’t allowed to be freed because of property rights (Document C). This was a huge deal because this is saying that the Supreme Court supports slavery, this angers the north, and leads to tensions. In 1850, Daniel Webster said, as an American, that the north was wrong because they weren’t following the laws (he was referring to the Fugitive Slave Act), and that they should do their constitutional duties. Webster is attacking the North because of the way they fight against slavery, and this makes the south look like they aren’t doing something bad, just “their constitutional duties” (Document D). Lincoln delivered a speech that stated, “A house divided against itself, cannot stand”. This makes the north and the south realize that America can’t succeed in the position they currently are in. Lincoln says that only one will prevail, and that they are going to need to live with it. This makes the South think that Lincoln is sided with the north (Document G). In the election of 1860, the nation is literally divided in half. In this election, Lincoln won (Document H). This causes the South to secede, and this is not fixable via

During the early 1800s, the United States was a new county and constantly expanded westward. Each time the borders of the country changed, the issue of slavery occurred because the north and the south disputed over whether the territory was a free state or a slave state. (Background) Henry Clay, a Kentucky congressman, created the Missouri Compromise addressed the issue of admitting states into the country as either a free or a slave state. However, this dilemma still persisted, therefore, the Compromise of 1850, involving congressmen Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, Stephen A. Douglass, and John C. Calhoun, replaced the Missouri Compromise. This issue incited fear, conflict, and danger into the minds of southerners and northerners. In the 1800s, slavery economically effected everyone’s lives and hence, the northerners feared the expansion of slavery threatened their economic well-being, whereas, the southerners feared the termination of slavery endangered their economic status.

During the early 1800s the United States was a nation divided amongst two groups; Abolitionists were against anti-slavery and were typically in the northern region, while their opponents who were proslavery were in the southern region. Following the ratification of the Constitution, many issues were left unresolved. The predominant argument amongst the two was slavery, and the latter was whether the nation would be a dissolvable confederation of sovereign states or an indivisible nation with a sovereign national government. Slavery during this time period was very controversial and in the early years after the constitution was ratified, disagreements were always settled without violence. The result usually ended with

Introduction During the mid eighteen hundreds there were high tensions between the Northern United States and the Southern United States. One of the main causes of the tensions between the Northern and Southern States of the United States was Slavery. After the United States won the United States-Mexican War there was a large portion of new land for the United States but there was one problem. The Northern part of the United States did not want to have slavery but the Southern part of the United States wanted slavery. To compromise they split the remaining and new land equally among the Northern and Southern parts of the United States.

In 1861, a civil war broke out in the United States when eleven southern states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America. The war was not ended until 1865, and it became one of the most destructive war in the American history. On the other hand, it also shows how the northern states and the southern states were already diverging from one another just less than a hundred years after the founding of the United States. From the period between 1740 and 1865, the divergence of northern states and southern states from one another was mostly contributed by the dispute over the issue of slavery as a result of how the culture in the north and the south were drastically different, with focus on the difference in roles played by the northern states and southern states in the market economy that led to the debate on free labor versus slave labor, the difference in action and reaction between the northerners and southerners towards abolition reform, and the increasingly polarized stands between them on the slavery status for the existing and newly admitted states. On the other hand, the problem of federal power versus state power also had some contribution to the divergence between the north and the south because of the obstacles it produced in regards to political decisions over slavery.

Throughout the 1840’s and 1850’s a growing tension developed between the Northern and Southern states of America. That tension was primarily focused on the existence of slavery in the Southern states. Most Northern states had abolished slavery by 1850 and made a promise to the people to end slavery completely. They wanted the South to begin to become similar to the North, and to live under the concept of free labor, and not rely on slavery for productivity. The resentment for the interference of the North angered southerners because they felt that it was not the place of the federal government to interfere. Ever since the American Revolution sectional differences arose, the first being those favoring greater states rights and those

American’s who live in the 21st century know that slavery is terrible and also a touchy subject. But Americans used to rely heavily on slavery, how we perceive slavery in today’s society can either be the same or different from how others thought of slavery living within mid 1800s. People who resided in the northern region of American found slavery wrong as we do today. Americans who lived farther south however liked, and relied on slavery. In today’s world, we Americans almost all agree that slavery had been a negative factor of our country. But within the 1840s and 1870s, Americans had been divided by slavery. People that were against slavery created the union as the pro slavery citizens created the confederates. Today, we can see why people of the mid 19th century either supported slavery or rebelled against it by reviewing sources.

When slavery is brought to mind, many negatives come to head like punishment and having no respect for people who are different. However, there were many positive outcomes that came from this for the economy and social system that assisted both whites and blacks. Some slaves, being the lightest in color and had the prettiest facial features,were put as domestic servants while many of the other slaves worked in the fields picking cotton as well as tobacco and other types of crops. The Southern region of the United States was more slave based while the Northern region was based mostly on industrialization. Profit increased steady in the beginning to the half of the nineteenth century because as the price of cash crops started to rise, the keeping and “caring” of slaves remained the same.