Slope Test Lab Report

The bar chart was used to compare the number of species in each transect. In transect A, there were 5 different species. The species in this area were mostly grass, forbs, moss, bugs and beetles. Bugs and beetles made up a small population of this transect. In transect B, there were also 5 species. The species were mostly grass, shrubs, forbs, moss and bugs. In this transect, shrubs were found which makes transect B more diversed than A. In Transect C, 8 species were located in this area. The species included shrubs, grass, fobs, evergreen, trees, dirt, bugs and spiders. New species such as evergreen, trees, dirt and spiders were located in this location. Therefore the test that diversity happens through ecological succession was

Finally we got all our number and determine the slope, and the intercept in order to find out the forecast for the next

Given these circumstances in the country there is a rich variety of fauna and flora, since the quantities of species find their habitat in different regions of the country. "The

According to the Map on the STEMS Tour Map page, which treatment takes up the most acreage?

1) Which type of function (linear, exponential, or cubic) do you believe will best fit the data? Support your choice.

Plot, Setting Analysis: (A level 4 analysis will make at least 3 different

2. (5 pts) List and explain the names and affiliations of the various characters/stakeholders in this story – I’m looking for us to use the story to map out the complexities that are generally associated with solving public health puzzles – the stakeholders you list and explain here should apply to many of the cases we consider going forward.

Civica will first create the model for future conditions based on the calibrated model. This will involve adding proposed ponds and changing parameter values to reflect the future developments (e.g. imperviousness and curve number).

7. Explain why the results in Requirement 1, Part D, and Requirement 6 differ. Be specific.

Slope determination is a valid way to calculate density because the slope of the data and the actual slope were close in value. When looking at the slope of the graph with the points, they were all relatively close. Three of the five point were even on the slope line. The formula of (y2-y1/x2-x1) allowed the finding of the slope of the line graphed and it also allowed the comparison to the actual slope of silver. This allowed the calculation of the percent error and also to see how effective slope determination really is. The slope of silver was 10.5g/cm³ and the slope of my findings was 10.15g/cm³. The percent error was low at 3.3% which points to slope determination

The main objective of this lab was to measure the friction force it takes to start moving a weighted block across a table, and as it continued to move. This force was tested experimentally in three separate ways. The force was then solved graphically and mathematically through six different runs per method. TALK ABOUT RESULTS HERE.

In our experiment the question we were trying to answer was “Does a physical change, change the mass of an object”. This means that when you take a tablet or clay and you crush it or alter the shape of it and it does not weigh the same after then the weight of the object did change and that would answer your question. When a physical change occurs it is not forming a new object it is just changing the way it looks or changing a solid to a liquid such as ice melting. During our experiment we took our two objects( ice and clay) and weighed them to get the initial weight before anything happened to them. The starting weight of the clay was 7g and the starting weight of the ice was 20g. After we weighed them we set the ice to the side

Friction Lab Formal Report Tayado Langley 12/10/14 Period 1 Abstract This experiment was created in order to enhance our understanding about the causes of friction. This was achieved by testing the friction on various surfaces. The first thing I did was gather the materials ( a bottle , some blocks of wood , string and surface materials.) Then I attached the string to the block of wood and the bottle.

point as the model answer? If not, determine why not. If the differing result is

The hypothesis tested in this experiment was, “If the surface material is more roughly textured, than the amount of sliding friction will increase.” This hypothesis was supported by the experiment in all nine trials. In the experiment, it was evident that when a material is rougher, there is more sliding friction. When testing the smoothest material, masonite, it only took an average of 4.6 washers to have to block move significantly across the surface. When testing the in-between material, the cloth, it had in-between results. The average amount of washers was 12.3. When testing the toughest material, sandpaper, it took an average of 18.6 washers for the block to move significantly across the surface. This is because with the smoother