In the recording session, listening to all the tracks, I chose two different microphones from the MXL 800 series- the large and the small caps diaphragm. Both microphones were condenser microphones. Listening to both microphones at the track I discovered few interesting facts between them. First, I mange to listen to the smaller cap both on the recorded hammer part of the piano and the recorded strings and I find that both microphone had different sound. For the small cap that was recorded on the hammer of the piano sound decent yet it sounded little muddy. It sounded like when it had an insert plug-in of a chorus or modulation that when the key was stroked the sound was aggressively vibrating, the piano’s sustain was little aggressive- Picturing if there was a lot of sound waves combined together. Also it sounded as if the piano was played in a small room which the sound sounded much tied. Next, the smaller cap on string recording, sounded much more balanced. It sounded tied yet the every note on the piano sounded realistic. Moreover, the dynamic range was wide enough that it was easy to listen to especially it had good amount of bass and harmonics of the piano. The microphone sound more open rather than narrow sound like the hammered one.
On the larger cap diaphragm condenser microphone on
…show more content…
The microphones produced many important elements such as larger diaphragms records more sound of highs and lows yet I learned it has a disadvantage if it records too much sound for example on the strings of the piano, it can sound very muddy and bombarded with different frequencies. Similarly with small caps on hammers can cause trouble- when concentrates too much on one area which it becomes a dominant sound overall of the recording. Furthermore, this I came to acknowledge the fact that Microphones compliment the artist when it position
It is usually pre-recorded and placed over the top of a film or video and commonly used in documentaries or news reports to explain information. Focusing on selected sounds can create tension, atmosphere, and emotion. It can also impart personality to film characters. Walter Murch (the doyen of sound designers) once described the character sounds (in a film he directed) as "coronas" which can magnify each character' s screen space. A figure who is associated with a particular sound (often suggested by his or her clothing), has "a real presence that is pervasive even when the scene is about something else or the character is off-screen."
audio is by all means justifiable. In order for the scenes to influence the audience, Minn
This Blue Yeti USB Microphone will make you reminiscent of that good old, classic microphone with its retro-based theme of shiny metal grilles and silver, chrome-toned frame. With its carefully crafted design, it is quick and easy to adjust, with the help of a set of knobs to secure it in place, to suit your desired microphone angle that aids in improving and optimizing sound quality.
The printing press is often overlooked when it comes to the impact it had on music and music notation. The first impact the printing press made on music was making reproduction of music more widely available. This made it easy for the average person to read, sing, and play music. The printing press made it possible for composers to distribute their music. This led to the ability to purchase music from varied artist. Finally, the printing press allowed for music to be at social events. With the printing press people could gather with family and friends in informal situations and enjoy each other company. Music became more social and enjoyable, even leading to some people to preform as an entertainer to make money.
In this specific piece, you can hear the buzz from the microphone stands when the low end really resonates. As mentioned earlier, the piece jumps in dynamics so in the track you can hear on high quality speakers that buzz every time the low end builds up. Some of the sections were really reliant on just low end and that slight hiss from the microphone stand distracted me in a way. Another thing I disliked about the track was his timing throughout his piece. As mentioned, one of the things I liked were the delayed hits and those were also another thing I disliked. They worked when transitioning higher and lower sections, but they screwed up all of his progressions. During these times of the recording is when some of random sounds came about that I disliked. I felt like he would get me very in tune with the piece then drop me out with an offbeat note or
Sound, just like any other medium, allows us humans do do a range of things. For example sound was used by slaves to convey the pain and suffering they experienced. As explained by Frederick Douglass in his narration, slaves sang songs and chants accompanied by various sounds like chains and thumping while out on the field or partaking in lengthy journeys. To Douglass, music was the most important component used by slaves to disclose their underlying emotions. In addition, sound, just like any other medium, is constantly being developed by us humans widening its functionalities.
It made the actors voice unrecognisable, he mumbled and couldn’t pronounce words properly – giving the impression that the actor was nervous. His body language and use of large gestures and a wide stance suggested however that this was not the case. The amplification of the Narrator wasn’t the best quality as the sound projected into the audience was accompanied by a slight crackle. The poor sound quality was also evident during the songs, not only of the
In terms of sound the film is able to use effective sound mixing to mix in several characters speaking at once along with background noise (Thomas Youtube). It also integrates the microphones into the background to avoid using boom mics and allowing the viewer to see the ceiling of buildings, helping to establish a greater sense of realism (Thomas Youtube). Finally the film even makes heavy use of Matte paintings in the background, something that had been pioneered in the 30s and is used effectively in the film (Lewis Smoodin 110). Altogether the film is able to make good
The vocal quality of these actors without microphones was actually, in my opinion, better that if it had been done with microphones because of the shape of the theater. The voices weren’t overly loud and they weren’t too soft. It was the perfect balance of stage speaking and normal talking. The body movements of the actors helped convey their character and their age because certain ages act and move a certain way. For example, Emily (Crawford) was wearing a dress when she came home from school and when her mother asked her to help her with something she just flopped down on the ground which is a teenage girl way of acting.
This time we will focus on the analysis of the sound of a film that, in addition, to be well achieved according to my personal appreciation, has been nominated for several awards for sound and has won some of them. It is then a proposal that, when like others, it is convenient to analyze and understand, to take from it what works best for us or interest, or for our future productions. For this I have chosen the feature film Pan’s labyrinth (2006) by director Guillermo del Toro; in charge of the sound Martin
In addition, it is also paramount for the audio quality to be consistently audible for all members of the audience. This will be achieved by utilising a system design configuration that focus’ on clarity and direction whilst also rendering itself sympathetic to the sensitive ears of the general public not attending the event.
Do you see those neat looking holes in the brass plate inside the piano? Stick your ear near them and you will find that they focus some interesting tones. Take advantage of this by placing a small square of foam next to the hole of your choosing and then tape a small diaphragm condenser mic on the foam.
The cinematic language that we know of today would not be as it is today if we had synchronous sound recording from the beginning of film. Cinematic Language is the systems, methods or conventions by which movies communicate with the viewer. A few examples of cinematic language are; montage; mise en scene, the use of long takes, depth of field shooting in order associate people or objects; Expressionism, the use of lighting techniques, severe camera angles, and elaborate props, to name a few aspects; and realism, a technique to make the action seem as true to life as possible. The list of techniques and styles of cinematic language go on, and can only be limited by the imagination. Early films, and early sound films both had something in common; they lacked many elements of the cinematic language. The reason sound films reverted back to the same pre-cinematic style of early films, was due to the fact that they had technical difficulties, that required them to fall into the style of the old ways. I do believe that if filmmakers would have had sound from the beginning, with the same sense of movie direction they worked with, they would have used sound as a crutch rather than an enhancing element.
This does not detract the sources useful information as to the advancements of recording studio technology. Bryce Merrill illustrates the interactions between memory and home studio recordings through presenting ethnographic data in his paper, Music to Remember Me By . Merrill creates an interesting argument, supporting the use of home recording studios and their impact upon musicians in regard to wellbeing. The key elements within this article centre on the use of memory in the studio, new technologies, and the practice of home recording. The emphasis on personal experience and a lack of adequate external evidence, however, is apparent within this article which does compromise the validity of the notions presented. Although, it does serve as a great personal case study as Merrill explains his personal perspective of technological changes. More so, Merrill also manifests the personal impact and the necessity to adapt to technological changes, alluded to within Gibson 's article, which is also mentioned by Pinch and Bijsterveld . Therefore, these sources provide an overall solid basis for further research into the effect of technology upon both home and professional recording studios. The advancements made in digital music technology has allowed the accessibility of information on recording knowledge, that was once privy to those within a professional status. Studio engineers have always depended
You might not realize it but this is true. It is also true that singers use their voice in order to perform while recording their song. You would say, why use electronic music if you could just record your voice and the instruments? The main difference is that the “raw” voice and instruments would sound bad when they are freshly recorded. Even if you record it with the most expensive microphone, you would still end up with a recording that doesn’t sound like most of the hits you hear on the radio or any other platform. This is because your recording is not what is called “processed” with modern audio tools. There are many tools that will greatly improve the sound of your song. It’s generally really good to know the basics of these tools. This knowledge would be good for any work with any audio. For example you could use this knowledge to fix the audio in a film or a small video that you made. It’s doesn’t take a long time to comprehend these basic tools. They will allow you to increase the quality of any audio that you are working