Smith Consulting Intro to Software Engineer

It 's important to say that for more fickle projects, auxiliary frameworks exist for thoughts regarding project management, particularly the spiral model (Melonfire, 2006). The Spiral Life Cycle Model is a kind of iterative software development model which is normally put into practice in extreme risk projects ("Spiral," n.d.). In this system development method the aspects of both, waterfall model and prototype model are united. In the spiral development model the activities can be arranged in the form of a spiral ("Spiral," n.d.).

Cost and resource needs are higher for traditional than Agile due to Waterfall’s sequential development phase of all requirements determined in the beginning, software design and finally implementation of master design. The need for all information up front takes substantial time to gather and the sequential design does not allow for project changes as the flow enters into the programming stage. With Agile, costs remain low because there exists an incremental and iterative approach to the project, meaning less time is used to collect all requirements up front, the

The preferred methodologies for managing a software’s lifecycle are a major factor in deciding how a firm reacts to market demands. The major SDLC frameworks followed are the waterfall model, Agile methodology (scrum) and Kanban. We will discuss this answer

In order to achieve successful results within established time-frames and budgets, project managers are likely to employ methodologies models. A project methodology is a model that aids managers to plan, design and implement their project goals. Project methodologies are helpful to project manager in any field, for instance, Niel Nickolaisen CIO at the Western Governors University, is an advocate for the agile software development methodology. As these models grants flexibility when dealing with stipulations and scope changes on a project. Needless to say the agile software development methodology is just one example of a varied assortment of methodologies, each with their strengths and weakness. As such, it is up to the project manager to decide which methodology fits their needs, as there isn`t a one fits all solution.

One of the initial steps in researching a problem is to know exactly what the problem is and compose a problem statement that unambiguously identifies and defines the problem to research. Sekaran (2003) said, “No amount of good research can find solutions to the situation, if the critical issue or the problem to be studied is not clearly pinpointed” (p. 69). The area of research for this paper focuses on software development, in particular, the study of agile software development methodologies and if these methodologies are successful in delivering software on time, within budget, and includes the requested features.

The development process I chose was SDLC, when I should have chosen Scrum. SDLC develops information systems and applications where Scrum develops business process, information systems, and applications.

The traditional development method requires the definition and documentation of a stable set of requirements at the beginning of the project. It was inherited by other projects mainly related to construction which focused on the completion of one phase of production before moving on to the next phase, for example, laying the foundations of a building first and then proceeding with the further stages (Bowes 2014). Similarly, in Waterfall, the requirement gathering and designing work is done upfront before any coding takes place. The basic notion behind the traditional development approaches is that the projects are comparatively less complex, linear and predictable with clearly defined system boundaries which makes it simple to plan and follow without having any room for changes (Spundak 2014). Moreover, traditional development method depicts the requirements document as he key piece of documentation. The gathering of all the requirements, getting a sign off from the customer and then starting with the development of the project gives the project a limit of

The two reports attempt to explore the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing agile software development over the waterfall model. As described in the reports, more and more organizations are considering the agile process approach versus the more traditional waterfall approach. The agile processes evolved in the late nineties and began to emerge as a primary software development method. While organizations are moving towards agile processes, it is unclear which process is the most used. Article A details a survey in which 153 developers were asked to describe their software development processes. The waterfall method was the most used software development method. However, Article B details that 36 out of 66 projects analyzed revolved around the agile methodology. Nonetheless, both articles conclude that one method or approach is not a best fit for all projects.

For years companies have turned to IT (Information Technology) to make things easier and reduce the waste of paper and human computers. When companies find themselves regularly maintaining and upgrading their software is there room for Lean in software development? With business requirements perpetually changing can a business get to the place where the system is good enough? Cost cutbacks, faster time-to-market, improved products and differentiated services are now the essential pillars in managing any software development process. The shift has been to move away from the customary Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) approach to newer standards that provide higher certainty and decreased risk by ensuring that business deadlines are met. (Pillai, A., Pundir, A., & Ganapathy, L., 2012, p. 107).

Abstract: Scrum Methodology has been the chosen development framework for the past decade. Created in 2001, Scrum has taken over as the development framework of choice by business and companies [7]. Scrums counterpart, the Waterfall Methodology has taken a back seat to Scrum. The traditional developmental framework used by companies and businesses previously was The Waterfall Methodology. When Scrum got developed it created a better understanding of how to develop projects in iterations rather than a linear waterfall style. Scrum is a developmental framework that is done in iterations and can be implemented on many different projects. This paper will go more into depth about the Scrum Methodology, The Three Artifacts, The Three Roles, Scrum Ceremonies, and The Waterfall Methodology.

Abstract: Agile software development is a conceptual framework for software engineering that promotes development in iterations throughout the life-cycle of the project .Software developed during one unit of time is referred to as an iteration, which may last from one to four week Scrum is part of the Agile movement. It is a lightweight process framework for agile development. The Scrum method is most often used to manage complex software and product development, using iterative and incremental practices. And results have been shown about significantly increase in productivity and reduces time to benefits relative to classic “waterfall” processes. But scrum method also have some problems and to overcome the problems a new approach is proposed

Looking at each methodology from a different perspective, the management perspective, unveils additional benefits and setbacks. The rigidity of the Waterfall method for software development can be cumbersome when dealing with changing expectations, but it makes it easier for management to manage the project’s progression. Having clear goals makes it easy for managers to track the development process. It is more difficult to track a project where requirements are constantly evolving. Most of the projects (not involving software development) in our department are tracked through their process. As goals are achieved, completion nears 100%.

The article also covered the “Manifesto for Agile Software Development,” which was an outcome of an event held in 2001. The “Manifesto for Agile Software Development” is basically a set of values and principles that software developers came up with from that event that should help themselves and others improve the ways of developing software. At the end of the article there is a list of the principles that make up the Manifesto for Agile Software Development. The author also covered why Agile is becoming more favorable in regards to the software being delivered in the form of a service and less of a good. He also explained the roles that the licensee and licensor played in the way that the Waterfall Method software was delivered and updated. In addition, he compared it to the way Agile has changed software into more of a service that is conducted over the Internet. This article also covers in a brief paragraph the purpose of a development agreement and some terms that can be included in it to help both parties. Even though these development agreements can provide great uncertainty and high risk allocation, attorneys can use some features of Agile to help with managing those problems, instead of, being opposed to the development of Agile projects. Now in the article, An Excursion to Software Development Life Cycle, the author focuses more on the different stages in the software development

Traditionally, this organization has utilized a waterfall methodology to develop software. The two main reasons for this are that is a well vetted methodology, and it provides a very well defined scope that we can use to manage projects and stay within a defined budget. As the business climate becomes increasingly volatile, the benefits of using this methodology have quickly become detractors. As requirements shift, the waterfall methodology locks clients in to a specific predetermined scope. While this is a good way to control budget, it does not provide the flexibility required to meet client needs. Several new software development methodologies have gained traction in the industry over the past few years. However, none of them provides both the flexibility needed by the end user and the rigidity and control needed to manage both the scope and budget of a project in order to set client expectations appropriately. This proposal recommends a hybrid approach that utilizes three of the more flexible software

We believe that the Novopay system adapted the Waterfall methodology because basically their system was built in a plain and simple way. We also believe they used this methodology because they wanted the payroll system to be easier to manage, and desired each step or phase