Smoke Exposure And Its Impact On Health

According to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), any worker who handles sharp devices or equipment is at risk, especially those who handle hypodermic needles/syringes, suture needles, butterfly-type needles, blood-collection needles, scalpels and IV stylets. OSHA also estimates that over 5.6 million workers in the healthcare industry and related occupations are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens, with nursing staff suffering the most sharps-related injuries and subsequent infections.

The manager of Associate in Nursing operating theater raised issues with the organisation’s Ohio consultantconcerning the health and safety of employees and their exposure to surgical smoke. New workers had highlighted this issue, that had not been raised antecedently.

In order for the pathology service to work as a whole, a safe environment must be established as well as procedures which can be implemented if this safety is compromised. In order to do this pathology staff such as biomedical scientists must attend mandatory health and safety training meetings. For example, during my placement within the hospital, I had to attend a fire health and safety training meeting which was coordinated by qualified members of staff that aimed to educated attendants by providing relevant information. In the case of fire training, the use of particular fire extinguishers was explained. Any misconceptions brought up during these meeting were also resolved to endure that each member of staff clear about the information

This article was chosen to bring light to the possible effects on patient safety and patient care from nurses, and other

Surgical tools, medications and medical devices are supposed to be thoroughly inspected before they are put on the market. However, that is not always the case. In some cases, even when the medication, medical device or surgical tool is inspected, it still causes harm to patients. The dangers are often unknown until thousands of people are injured by the device or medication.

The purpose of this paper is intended to provide a review of the above formulated topic and backed up by research compiled through scholarly peer-reviewed literature as well as supportive statistical from entities such as: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), World Health Organization (WHO), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Further consideration was given to areas within OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standards that may have contributed to the mitigation of injuries in healthcare settings as they relate to occupational percutaneous injuries. Scholarly peer-reviewed literature and journals dating from 2002 to 2015 obtained from the University of West Florida library database were used to validate the findings on the impact of needlestick injuries since the BBP revisions were enacted while further comprehending its relation needlestick injuries and potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens.

Charles, R., Hood, B., Derosier, J. M., Gosbee, J. W., Li, Y., Caird, M. S., ... & Hake, M. E. (2016). How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: a review. patient safety in surgery, 10(1), 20.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality created a survey to understand patient safety from the healthcare provider’s perspective. There are numerous surveys geared towards patient satisfaction and quality control for the patients to participate in. However, this survey allows healthcare to be the participant and to be proactive in improving patient safety as well. This survey is directed to ambulatory (out-patient) surgical facilities. There are nine sections in the survey and each are broken down into specific components. The first section pertains to available resources and time management when working within the facility. The second section apply to to training and collaboration of colleagues. The third section is concerned with problem

In the health care system, patients put their trust and confidence in the hands of qualified medical professionals to properly handle all of their needs. Patient safety is an area that will continue to be explored and evaluated for improvement. In any clinical setting, it is imperative that proper diagnosis followed by an effective treatment plan is executed in a manner consistent with reducing the chance of mistakes being made. In the perioperative clinical environment the patient usually cannot speak for themselves due to being sedated. Therefore it is critically important to have a process in place to lessen or eliminated the possibility of performing the wrong surgery on the patient. The National patient safety

Even though as a manager, initially I would like to talk with the patients involved to get their sides of the story then communicate with my team. A number of patient safety complaints has warranted managers to investigate the staff to why many issues have occurred of this magnitude and no one has followed up or attempted to decrease the number of incidences. Moving forward, managers have used all the responses they have obtained from the assessments during this process to prevent any further measures and reprimand anyone implicated, end result have found that the whole time the reports filed no one have witnessed these accidents and can attest to them ever occurring. Throughout this investigation many assessments have taking place to find out what was causing the medical errors to take place, on the other hand, with the objective of reducing as many occurrences as possible.

The operating theatre is a multidisciplinary, highly demanding, and stressful environment. There is a variety of learning opportunities that can be encountered and be discussed. In this reflective paper, I will look deeper in my experience of the safe surgery checklist, infection control, and moving & handling practises inside the theatre. Furthermore, using John’s model of structured reflection (1995), I will criticise the significant events that happened in my placement of practise.

This assignment it will explain the health risks of what smoking can cause, it will also include up to date statics that are related to smoking.

The environment must be assessed routinely/daily for items that present potential threat. Equipment has not been properly secured and left within reach of patients who may use such items to inflict harm to self or others. Unsecured hazardous items: a chart rack, heavy wooden chairs (with torn, tattered seating), a TV (which you acknowledged was broken) and a radio with exposed cable cords were found in the visitors’ areas. A sheet and plastic bags were found in the visitors’ area. Additional hazardous items include plastic covered mattresses and curtains. The aforementioned items are viable ligature tools and can provide a mechanism for harm to self or

to SSI’s. Another documented non-compliant factor are missed perioperative glucose control tests performed on all diabetic patients. This process continues intra-operatively addressing anesthesia, surgical techniques, and healing. Furthermore, preventive intraoperative measures are controlled operating room ventilation with the need to keep the operating room door closed, sterilization of surgical instruments, wearing correct surgical attire/drapes, and monitoring environmental surfaces. Surgical site infection’s can be stimulated by inconsistency of staff as well as poor surgical conditions. The facility adheres to all policies and procedures based on nationally recognized best care practice standards for prevention and infection control.

Surgery complications and adverse events resulting from procedures done on the wrong site or patient are a significant patient safety concern. The World Health Organization initiated a surgical checklist to be used as a basis for all surgical procedures within the hospital in 2008. The checklist is intended to reduce the number of deaths resulting from surgical procedures across the world (The World Health Organization, 2008a). This initiative was intended to harness clinical will in addressing vital safety issues like poor communication, surgical infection, and inadequate anesthetic safety practices. These safety issues had proven to be deadly, preventable, and common in all countries. The checklist was developed in consultation with nurses, surgeons, patient safety experts, patients, and anesthesiologists around the world. The WHO checklist is not a component of official policy or regulatory device, but it is intended to be used as a tool for clinicians who want to improve their operations safety and reduce unnecessary surgical complications and deaths (Reynolds & Stevenson, 2009). The checklist developed by the WHO is not comprehensive. WHO encourages modifications and additions in order for it to fit the local practice. The surgical checklist will assist any organization to formulate a surgical policy, which will ensure that the surgical team is certain of the procedures, site, and patient before the surgery begins. Making use of