Smoking In Public Places - Is a Public Smoking Ban The Answer?

Smoking is an activity that has been around for many years for people to use and adapt into their lifestyle. It is a tool that many people use to help reduce the stresses of life and put them in a comfortable position that enables them to cope with the hectic lifestyle they are living. However, smoking has been scientifically proven to cause many types of cancer, the most common being lung cancer resulting in numerous deaths across the United States. According to BBC, "Smoking is a greater cause of death and disability than any single disease" (BBC, 2). Evidently, the benefits and drawbacks of smoking have been debated for many years, and only recently have some countries have placed a ban in public places such as Britain and the United

Those who are opposed to this ban contend that it will hurt economic prosperity of their bars/taverns/clubs/restaurents, which are the areas that would be most effected by this ordanence. However, according to a recent study conducted by the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program in New York, this is not the case. Quite the

Smoking is a bad habit and the amount of smokers have hugely increased over the years, no matter how much effort the government and others have put, the number of smokers continue to increase. Allowing smokers to smoke at public venues, such as parks will only increase the dangers as it delivers the wrong message and harms other's health.

Have you ever gone to a restaurant or to the bowling alley and come home smelling like cigarette smoke? And while you were there, some people are sitting there smoking by you and you can’t stand the smell of it. So you go out side and to get some fresh air and what do you know there’s some more people lighting it up and smoking but they are polite enough to go outside. Doesn’t this annoy you, that you can barely go anywhere without people smoking in your presence. This leads us to the question, Should smoking in public areas be allowed? Smoking in public areas is something that could definitely be dealt without. The things I will cover with you are the effects of smoking, the effects of

Public smoking has been an issue for people who do not take part in the smoking epidemic for as long as smoking has been around. What people need to understand is that individuals who do not engage in the activity of ruining their lungs are being forced into the act of involuntary smoking rather they like it or not, and that is unacceptable.

Smoke does affect not only the smoker but also the individuals who are inhaling the smoke. Many people have understood what it causes or seen the effects of smoking, and yet they still do it. While many places still allow smoking areas, they should be banned because it still dangers the health of individuals who are non-smokers by hurting their lungs and most importantly their

My name is Pasquale Oppedisano and I think smoking should be banned in the workplace (inside and out) for many reasons. One is smoking is considered to be a dirty habit by most people, two passive smoking is just as bad if not worse than smoking, smoke shortens and damages equipment for example computers, higher risks of accidents like fires, loss of work time because of smoking activities and difficulties in hiring/keeping employees that are sensitive to smoking.

The smokers who choose to bring harm to themselves have the right to damage their health if they choose. The alternatives non smokers have are to not be in presence of smokers. Where public places advertise no smoking, and still supple designated areas for smokers they should still take in account that the smoke still ventilates the surrounding areas. My advice is not to engage where there is no smoking, and smoking areas. The fumes from the non smoking area cannot be contained completely. If you don’t want to stop passive don’t attend these public places. The article on line indicated if there was enough non-smokers going to these public facilities there would be no need to post no smoking () .

In the article “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” by Robert Procter states that “Another objection commonly raised to any call for a ban is that this will encourage smuggling, or even organized crime.” I can agree with this statement although this author is for banning this statement brings out a huge issue that could potentially arise from banning tobacco. If there is a will there will be a way. Another outrageous idea I read in the article called “Regulatory Approaches to Ending Cigarette-Caused Death and Diseases in the United States” by Richard Daynard was the fact that the government would give tobacco companies a limit to how many cigarettes that can produce each year. By doing this it stated by the end of 2015 “it would become unlawful for a cigarette manufacturer to produce more than two-thirds of the brands baseline.”. So not only would the indoor-outdoor smoking bans be in effect the government would now be regulating the amount of cigarettes produced in the United States. Therefore I feel as strongly as others about banning smoking rights. I am a non-smoker myself and as long as you aren’t purposefully blowing smoke in my face, feel free to do as you please. While you can, that is.

The Senate recently joined the House of Representatives in backing the statewide ban. The two branches of legislature will meet in January to revise a draft of the bill for the statewide ban, which will most likely pass in early 2004 and take effect July 5, 2004, making Massachusetts the 6th state to ban smoking statewide. California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, and New York have already passed similar bans.

We would like to believe that most americans would like a total ban on smoking, recent studies have shown that 80% of people that have never smoked oppose a complete ban saying “it goes too far in the direction of curtailing personal liberties” (Robinson and Spear). Smokers and non smokers need equal rights. Purdue University considered an all out ban as other colleges have done, but changed their minds after receiving campus input (Cruz). After many protests and complaints regarding colleges ban on smoking. Majority of people feel the need to have buffer zones in which there is no smoking within a certain amount of feet around buildings. The best solution is for us to have a special smoking area, and for schools to help students who are ready and willing to quit.

Smoking bans have a high pro on our community. They help protect the health of people, smoking bans ensure that smoking in public place will prevent non-smokers to come in contact with second-hand smoke. They help lower healthcare cost, they reduce chances of becoming ill or ending up in the hospital. It helps people save money because of how

The smoking population in London stands around 1.2 million and with such a significant percentage of this city with the habit, it is unsurprising the ban has caused such wide controversy. Without hesitation, I add my voice to the chorus of non-smokers who think this ban goes too far. However, I am not saying that smoking is in any way good as I am extremely aware of the gruesome health risks and unattractive photos of black lungs and lopsided livers that litter the media. I just ask of you Britain; can’t you be content with how far we have come? We have banned Tobacco advertising and sponsorship, banned smoking in public places like bars and pubs and banned tobacco vending machines. Isn’t that enough?

Think about it, “isn’t having a smoking section in a restaurant like having a peeing section in a swimming pool?” “Why do drugstores make sick people walk all the way to the back of the store to get their prescriptions while healthy people can buy cigarettes at the front?” There have been debates and different opinions on whether smoking in public places is an issue or not. Of course, smokers would support and affirm their right to smoke where they please. As opposed to the other view, that smokers violate the non-smoker’s rights, and puts them at risk. The U.S. has funded an extensive amount of money in advertisement to quit smoking, making most Americans aware of the potential risks of smoking. What’s the result of smoking? Coffin. Smoking is the leading cause of lung and heart cancer, stated to cause those diseases in 90% of smokers. A significant number of cancers seen in people who don’t smoke can be pointed at the smokers. New York has place designated areas in public places to adhere to the smokers individual rights to smoke where they please. Some believe it is their constitutional right to smoke in public places while others suggest to ban smoking in public places altogether. The ones who want to ban smoking in public places worry about second-hand smoke, which put people who don’t smoke in danger of cancer, and pollutes the area. Smokers suggest they have been allowed to smoke where they pleased for years, and because of that shouldn’t be banned in public places.

Smoking is a well known habit. Many people smoke despite its obvious and widely advertised deleterious effects on health. Smoking is not only bad for the immediate users, but also the people surrounding them. It is an addiction that can effect others without their consent. Not only is it unhealthy physically but also a very expensive habit. It costs millions a year, and that is just to buy enough cigarettes to satisfy your addiction, not counting the cost of medical care needed, renovations of homes that smoking has ruined, and more problems branching from smoking. Having restrictions on smoking would not only benefit the individual smoker, but also people around them. Some may argue that its just a harmless habit and that putting a