Essay about Smoking In Public Places - Smoking Bans

This problem, which plagues all Americans, should have action taken on a local scale to help protect the health of the public. The Ames City Council is in the process of debating a city ordanince which whould ban smoking in all public places, with the exception of those designated as "smokng areas". A public place shall be defined by Subsection

Smoke does affect not only the smoker but also the individuals who are inhaling the smoke. Many people have understood what it causes or seen the effects of smoking, and yet they still do it. While many places still allow smoking areas, they should be banned because it still dangers the health of individuals who are non-smokers by hurting their lungs and most importantly their

She claims that even though conflicts are arising because of the bans, smokers will become more understanding of the bans in the future. She uses Mayor Bloomberg of New York City as an example. She states that “Mayor Michael Bloomberg drew much fire in New York City by outlawing smoking in restaurants and bars. Now in a city of easier breathing and increased longevity, his efforts are seen as a solid legacy.” As long as individual liberties continue to be limited, smokers will never completely come to terms with banning smoking in their own home. In restaurants around the nation, smoking is commonly allowed, but only within a designated smoking zone, which is usually in a room separate from those who are non-smokers. Completely outlawing smoking in restaurants in New York City was a very poor political decision because it put a severe strain on individual liberties, for many New Yorkers are known for smoking cigarettes, but now can’t even enjoy a meal and smoke in designated areas. Banning this kind of smoking did not make for “easier breathing” and “increased longevity” for New Yorkers. In a big, populated city like New York City, litter poses a bigger threat to individual health. According to the New York City government website, there is even a main phone line to call about chronic littering

New Jersey has to continue the prohibition of smoking in public access restaurants, bars, parks, and clubs. Nonsmokers can consume second hand smoke which is dangerous. The risk of smoking in a building can result in a fire and lead to traumatic events. The smell of smoke can deter people from coming in. Smoking bans are very important to preserve intact, so we don’t have these risks to society and businesses. For a long time people have had different views about smoking in public places. Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they want, and nonsmokers feel like their rights are getting violated.

Raising taxes on tobacco products and implementing smoking cessation legislations can minimize the prevalence of smoking up to 30 percent to 80 percent over a 50-year period (Ekpu & Brown 2015).In 2009, NBC news stated that Kansas, one of the states, considering banning smoking at enclosed areas showed that if they banned smoking in restaurants, the state was going to save 20 million dollars in healthcare costs (Associated Health, 2009). West Virginia state implemented smoke-free laws and had an increase of almost 1 percent in restaurant employment (“Smoke Free Laws do not Harm Business,” 2017). Restaurant workers were more comfortable coming in to work knowing they would be breathing in fresh air. Although in Tennessee, percentage of adults who smoked in 2011 increased from 23 percent to 24.3 percent in 2015 (Fletcher, 2016). This increment was not that significant considering the fact that it was over a period of just 4 years. The annual health care cost in Tennessee directly to smoking increased from $2.16 billion in 2004 to $2.67 billion in 2017(“The Toll of Tobacco in Tennessee”, n.d.).

It makes them can easily to become a smoker later. That is why, if the state will raise the smoking age to 21, people will not have a chance to try it. In fact, many municipalities across the country on the other hand have raised the smoking age to 21. For instance, in 2005, the bill was passed in Needham, Massachusetts and in 2012; the percent of smoker had dropped significantly by 50 percent. Besides that, the positive results in regards to decrease in numbers of smokers have made many cities and counties to follow the suit as well. For example, New York City, New York, Hawaii County and many others have reported a drop of 45 percent of their high school smoking rate. That is why; if the bill would be passed successfully, the percent of smoker in Washington State will be reduced.

In Minnesota there was a state wide smoking ban that took effect on September 30, 2007. “The Minnesota law applies to bars, restaurants, and private clubs.” (Brunswick, 2007) This change in the law has affected some of the business in many bars. Recently there have been a few bars that have found a “loophole” in the Freedom to Breathe Act. The loophole basically states that smoking is

Tobacco remains legal and the treasury is said to make around 10 billion each year from taxing it. Coincidentally many states still have smoker-friendly bars. The smoking ban is said to be bad for business as well. Despite more efforts to prove otherwise, pubs and clubs are dying, in part, because of the business lost as smokers find somewhere else to drink they can smoke in peace. Where and how smokers think will always be beyond my understanding. They believe that the smoking ban is technologically backwards. It is not difficult, with decent modern air filtration technology, to make smoke virtually unnoticeable and certainly harmless. The smoking ban does not stop people from smoking. Even if it were appropriate to

smoking in all public, out-door spaces,hotels, prisons, and etc. places creating and implementing federal smoke-free policies throughout

In Florida, a study by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research at the University of Florida found that the statewide smokefree law, which took effect July 1, 2003, has not hurt sales or employment in the hotel, restaurant and tourism industries.” (Chastain)

Banning of smoking in public places, such as restaurants and bars have been very positive outcomes for the recent years. Smoke-free policies do send strong and direct messages to

Smoking is an expensive habit. People who smoke cigarettes can spend as much as $2,500 a year on them. Smokers’ claim that it helps relax them and it releases stress but the negative aspects of smoking outweigh the positive. Smoking is a health hazard for smokers and non-smokers. Smokers should have the right to choose what to do with their own health but they should respect non-smokers. Many people believe that there are good and bad outcomes from smoking. I believe that smoking is bad and that it should be banned.

Simply put the majority believes that the right to smoke cigarettes is not in the constitution and in that, it's not illegal to put more and more regulations on smoking. It is indisputable that tobacco use causes a litany of negative health effects and in that, the public should do more to help put more regulations on tobacco usage altogether. For one thing individuals can get involved by volunteering to work smoking prevention hotlines. This allows people to counsel others who are having a hard time giving up smoking, or keeping themselves from starting. On the other hand, individuals can attend addiction seminars. Through this they can meet other smokers, and attempt to help them deal with their issues in a healthy, helpful manner. In the same light, people and talk to their family members and friends who smoke, and try to help them deal with their problems so that they wouldn’t have to turn to smoking. Smoking is an epidemic that kills millions worldwide each year; it's up to each and every one of us to put an end to

Tobacco is one of the most widely-used recreational drugs in the world; mainly in the form of cigarettes, but also in cigars and pipes, and in combination with cannabis and marijuana in 'joints'. Although most countries put age restrictions on its use, over a billion adults smoke tobacco legally every day, and supplying this demand is big business. As well as having serious health consequences for smokers themselves, the pollution of other people's atmospheres with cigarette smoke also makes this an environmental issue. Attitudes have changed rapidly over the past twenty years. In the developed world, public opinion has shifted against smoking.

E-cigarettes have heating elements that are battery operated and hold cartridges of nicotine and other liquids and flavoring. They were produced to assist those who are trying to quit smoking or reduce the amount of nicotine that is actually inhaled in the body to make it a safer product for the consumer than actually smoking a cigarette. There is controversy on whether or not this product promotes a safer nicotine habit or stimulates someone to begin smoking habits. Most importantly, those who do not smoke at all are concerned whether or not the secondhand smoke emitted from these devices is harmful for those who do not wish to inhale nicotine products. There are states laws that