Snc Case Study

Candidate Jordan delivered an in depth five paragraph order. SNC posted security ensuring that the safety of the fire team was not put at risk. SNC had a good initial plan and proceeded to move the fire team towards the objective. SNC moved the fire team through the woods with minimal opposition; SNC maintained communication and good dispersion. Upon receiving enemy fire SNC suppressed the enemy by assaulting the enemy. SNC pushed through the objective to ensure that all enemy were killed. However, SNC forgot about the weapons cache and commenced to conduct a hasty 180, followed by a consolidated 360, and then an ACE report. SNC, in his haste to complete the problem, completely forgot that the mission was not only to subdue the enemy

Candidate Allwood was able to provide all of the information required for the operation order brief. SNC included most of the information he was given; however, SNC briefed that the ammo needed to be delivered to the bridge and not to the designated LZ. SNC was able to control the movement of his squad as they began the execution; however, SNC lead his squad through dense brush causing the forward movement to be slow. SNC was able to make the required adjustments to put his squad back on track as they retrieved the ammunition. SNC made the decision to cross the bridge with the first fire team, putting him in the best position to control his squad. During the engagement, SNC was only able to provide minimal information for an ADDRAC. SNC

Overall, Candidate Friederick's lack of confidence hindered both her operations order and her execution of her assigned mission. Her delivery lacked enthusiasm and interest. While her lack of confidence indicated unfamiliarity with the five paragraph order, SNC did brief a detailed mission statement with a task and purpose. SNC also briefed some details of her scheme of maneuver and some tasks to her subordinates, but the lack of detail and her confidence ultimately failed to inspire the other candidates in her fire team. As her fire team moved from order to execution, SNC appeared lethargic with little to no awareness of her surroundings as the team approached the objective. SNC both heard and saw the enemy combatant and demonstrated

Candidate Long’s performance was extremely impressive. He started his problem by conducting a detailed leader’s reconnaissance and developing a practical solution to the problem. SNC briefed his peers with confidence and clarity. His order was only missing the “when” part of the mission statement. He was one of the few who physically set in his security and established fields of fire. He lead by example by being the first candidate on the platform and used critical thinking to develop his plan by examining the weights of each member of his fire team. He acted with a sense of urgency but remained calm and collective. Once he established the bridge to complete the problem, he quickly realized he needed the ammo can and sent a candidate

Candidate Fowler displayed a low sense of urgency taking about two minutes following the evaluator’s brief to write his order then briefed his fireteam for over five minutes. SNC provided an adequate brief to be able to execute the mission. The Mission paragraph contained an accurate task and purpose but also contained additional information that was not necessary. Additionally, when he repeated the mission, it was not at all verbatim. SNC provided a scheme of maneuver that was above average however; SNC’s tasks were merely assigned billets with no true task and purpose. Throughout the brief SNC was a little choppy, showing a little lack of confidence and weak understanding of his plan. SNC did not post security during his brief, but did improve

Candidate Lewton presented his brief confidently and with command presence. He showed a good understanding of the order and conveyed that in his brief hitting all the key points of the five-paragraph order. SNC failed to post security upon execution of the mission and did not realize this mistake. SNC’s initial plan was successful in getting one team member onto the wall with the first attempt. SNC was calm, confident and fully engaged throughout the mission. They were able to make it onto the second wall on their first attempt as well. Candidate Lewton used his subordinates giving orders from the rear and using his team as his eyes to survey the area for him. SNC’s fire team was able to make it to the ammo can but due to the time expiring,

Candidate Ozuna was very confident and briefed the five paragraph order clearly and thoroughly. SNC ensure his fire team had a clear understanding of the mission by repeating it and asking if there were any questions regarding the mission. He gave specific orders of where each fire team member was to place themselves in the formation as well as what the succession of command would be if he were to become a casualty. During the patrol, SNC ensured proper dispersion of the fire team as they patrolled. He was constantly keeping eye contact with his fire team members and utilized hand and arm signals well. SNC was able to make quick and sound decisions at the point of friction. He ensured the buddy rushes were done in a manner that was able

SNC’s five paragraph order contained most of the pertinent information required to conduct the mission, but was punctuated with filler words and the occasional use of nonsensical terms such as “armed with small ammo arms (sic).” These deficiencies detracted from the order and made it difficult to understand. SNC tasked his fire teams with navigation, aid and litter, and ammunition transportation. During movement to the objective, SNC’s squad became strung out and dispersion between the first fire team and the ammunition bearing fire team was approximately 20 meters. SNC did not assess dispersion during movement and did not position himself in a manner where he could effectively manage his squad. During enemy contact, SNC stood to the rear

Candidate McCormick demonstrated a fair understanding of the Five Paragraph Order format. Though SNC mentioned all the paragraphs, the details weren't germaine. SNC briefed the contents of Administration and Logistics as that of Command and Signal and vice versa. SNC was confident during the delivery of the order to the Fire Team but that demeanor weaned at the moment of execution of the exercise. SNC did not formulate a plan prior to execution and blindly commenced the exercise without delegating responsibility to Fire Team members. SNC attempted to perform tasks without communicating to or supervising the Fire Team. Towards the seven minute mark of the exercise, SNC looked exhausted and could not think through the problem. SNC did not maintain

SNC spoke at a normal volume and had a calm demeanor during his brief. He provided a good, thorough initial plan, pointing things out and explaining what he wanted to have happen during execution. However, his tasking statements did not adequate explain what he wanted each team member to do. He maintained tactical awareness by posting security and stressing in his brief that the enemy is inbound and the team must maintain a low profile and volume as they maneuver across the obstacle. His transition to execution was slow, and he did not inspire a sense of urgency in his team-members. During execution, his communication was not direct and assertive, but rather slow and contemplative. Throughout execution, SNC moved slowly, which reflected

Candidate Sirks began by completing a leader’s reconnaissance of the problem and immediately addressed security before briefing the fire team. His voice sounded confident, but his body language did not portray the same confidence as he shuffled around and did not make eye contact with his fire team. He thoroughly briefed his order with detailed tasks and coordinating instructions. Immediately after the order was complete, his fire team began to execute with minimal direction showing they understood the tasks assigned to them. SNC employed all of his fire team members adequately and directed them to carefully handle the POW, demonstrating he understood the tactical situation. SNC was able to adjust his plan without losing bearing and took time

SNC started the brief in a normal conversational tone and changed to a more forceful, commanding tone when outside noise interfered with the FT being able to hear him. He was unable to make eye contact with his team during the brief because they were posted in a 180 security pattern facing away from him. When SNC briefed the Tasks, he simply repeated the Scheme of Maneuver with the FT members names added where he wanted them. In addition he did not have a proper tasking for one of the FT members and simply told him to “help out where he could.” This lead to an additional issue because this FT member should have been posted as security during the execution, but SNC failed to order him to do so. SNC was unable to make adjustments to his plan at the points of

Candidate Allen briefed his order with above standard confidence. He showed a high understanding of the orders process by clearly explaining both a scheme of maneuver and detailed tasks for each subordinate. During execution, he utilized mission type orders and additional clear tasking statements to achieve his vision of the scheme of maneuver. When his initial plan failed, there was a brief period of time where he began to micromanage movements and lose his position to supervise the team. During this time, he broke down his security early and left the team defenseless. Candidate Allen showed a strong desire to accomplish the mission when his subordinates began to complain that the mission was not possible and he used a true force of will

Leadership comes from top down and in this case Col Parker needs to enhance her transactional leadership tools from Management by Exception to Contingent Reward or CR (discussed later in the plan of action) and strengthen her transformational leadership. She exhibits individual consideration by treating the members within the wing as family, not just subordinates. She has the people behind her simply because they know she genuinely cares about them and their well-being. This can be capitalized on as part of a new campaign to put an end to the mishaps. MSgt Jones and Mr. DeBurgh have a plethora of experience between the two of them that can be harnessed and developed. I will provide the intellectual stimulation (IS) for these team members to get them back in the game to provide ideas for a new safety campaign. Mr. DeBurgh eluded that he has ideas on how this problem can be conquered based on prior experiences and MSgt Jones can possibly provide cutting edge technologies in mishap prevention from the classes he takes. SSgt Williamson is ready and willing to work wherever she is needed. She’s been placed in an administrative role, but her passion regarding the recent mishaps surpasses her knowledge of file plans. She is a young innovative thinker and can provide great support in the campaign. SSgt Williamson, along with Lt Johnson, could

I truly enjoyed reading the material for this week 's discussion. I found it fascinating to read how these people of passion were so revered as leaders. Something I found difficult while reading the stories of these various leaders was the details of what they did within their respective industries that made them successful. Although I recognize the importance of the details, I found myself continually fanaticizing about how the many different approaches would directly translate to the fire service. Because of the uniqueness of the fire service as an industry, I found it easier to relate to themes and concepts rather than the details. 'Strengths Based Leadership ' by Tom Rath and Barry Conchie For example Simon Cooper stated: "people create memories, not things. If we ask guests what color the carpet was in their guest room, they probably won 't know. The real value comes from the ladies and gentlemen (employees) who bring that hotel to life. Ten percent is the platform, but the rest is people. (Rath & Conchie, 2008, p. 43) As I read this I couldn 't help but think of the fact that our customers in the emergency response world (fire service) likely remember more about how we treat them than what uniform we wear or what kind of apparatus we arrive in, so long as we bring true caring and compassion to their bedside. In addition Cooper 's people over platform approach was obvious in this Rath & Conchie description: "then when he talked of the night-and-day difference that a