Social And Ethical Standards For The Tobacco Companies

Big tobacco is losing in a war for the public to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and The Truth Initiative. Big tobacco being the large tobacco companies in the world like Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Imperial Brands, Japan Tobacco International, and China Tobacco. The CDC is a government operated agency that contributes to the overall health of the public. The Truth Initiative is the largest non-profit public health organization in the U.S. whose goal is to inspire tobacco free lives. Not only is Big tobacco losing, they may have already lost.

or so many years our society has been thinking of forming new creative and innovative businesses, which would be more environmental and customer friendly. Nowadays a large number of different companies follow the social, ethical, as well as moral consequences when it comes to their decision making. One of the relatively new concepts involving economic and social concerns is Corporate Social Responsibility. Many of us apply this approach not only at work, but also in everyday life without even recognizing.

In spite of all advantages mention earlier about ethically and socially responsible business practice, it also has disadvantages, limitation and challenges. The most common and obvious limitation would be the cost that comes together with every investment a business does in order to meet all publicity’s requirements, for instance setting up Ronald McDonald House Charities. Every business has a goal which is at the top of their goal list and it is to be profitable. What is more, it is challenging to maintain the publicity’s and stakeholders’ satisfaction when investing into the society, employees and the environment.

Tobacco is one of the world's dangerous drug which is haunting human lives to death. Over a billion adults are addicted to this drug and wasting their money, time and health. Nowadays there has been an ongoing debate/discussion among many people about the role of government in restricting the usage of Tobacco and thereby safeguarding the health of the public. In my personal opinion, both government and the Individual together needs to work to overcome this problem.

Author Peter Benson’s ethnography Tobacco Capitalism: Growers, Migrant Workers, and the Changing Face of a Global Industry, provides and extensive examination into the lives of tobacco famers residing in North Carolina and the global tobacco industry as it undergoes profound changes though facets such as globalization, industrialization, the anti-tobacco movement, and debates over immigration. The seventh most valuable agricultural commodity in the United States; tobacco is a $1.5 billion dollar industry and is valued above all other vegetables produced in the United States. This commodity remains in high demand despite its position as the single most preventable cause of disease and death in the United States. Benson’s ethnography explores decades of social change regarding the tobacco industry and its relationship with growers amidst the current anti-smoking and tobacco movement. Despite industrialization of the market, tobacco faming in North Carolina continues to operate as a family business with many growers tracing their farms back several generations. The basis of Peter Benson’s research was conducted in Wilson County, North Carolina, the largest and most active tobacco region in the United States. His research is based on twenty months of field study and archival research conducted from 2002 to 2010. The everyday life and social relations concerning tobacco growers, economic restructuring of the tobacco industry, and migrant labor camps will serve as the basis of

Health concerns are the primary issue for nearly all of the stakeholders. Employees care about their job security and integrity for their occupations. The government is responsible for ensuring the safety and overall welfare of its community. If tobacco is known as a health hazard to the citizens, then it is the responsibility of the government to act on it. The customers of the tobacco industry are another huge factor. Of course, they care about their health, the ingredients of the product, the quality, the cost, etc. Then there are the owners and shareholders who, while they may also care about the reputation of the business, they are mainly concerned with the continuation of the corporation and the profits from it.

Were there strategies used by public figures to create and spread doubt over scientific findings? In the early 1950s, the Tobacco industry was in disarray over the release of a scientific paper, on several mediums, that demonstrated the connection between the carcinogens in cigarette smoke to several types of cancer. In reaction to this devastating paper, Tobacco executives banded together along with a public relations firm, R.J. Reynolds, in order to shroud the reality of the situation; the actions taken by the Tobacco industry, ranging from funding distracting research to using public figures to speak on topics they had no authority in, would lead to an era of shrouding not only research concerning cigarettes, but also realizations about other issues, such as global warming and acid rain. There is no issue more important, out of those that were shrouded in doubt, than that of nuclear winter. By the 1980s, when President Reagan introduced his plan, the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI for short), there were numerous scientists who opposed it, however in the face of this massive opposition, several figures who had assisted in the tobacco campaign began to speak out in favor of the SDI, and attack the scientists researching issues related to the SDI such as nuclear winter. Several of the tactics used by the Tobacco industry were present in the nuclear winter issue, such as, the use of dubious authorities, the creation of committees dedicated to the spread of misinformation,

However our concern here is not only about the cigarette as a product but with the ethics of cigarettes as well, that affect the social process of marketing. This is because marketing process makes things worse and is also considered as unethical, and as a result has a significant negative impact on the societal welfare. Multinational tobacco companies apply sophisticated strategies ( such as putting flavor in the cigarettes and placing cigarettes in the shops near the sweets to make them more appealing) and invest huge amounts of money for marketing, in order to establish brand familiarity and future loyalty among young peoplem, to secure profits in the long run. 'The tobacco epidemic is a man-made international health crisis, created and sustained by multinational tobacco corporations.' (Yach, Brinchmann, Bellet page 2).

Roger Blanpain was the first professor to do a wide-ranging study in his bid control the use of environs tobacco smoke in place of work. Professor Blanpain had a unique methodology in his analysis dissimilar to his peers in the same field because he researched the basic rights of tobacco users and their basic right to smoke as well as the financial impact. Professor Blanpain’s study was comprised of thirteen national versions that were acquired from North America, Europe and Asia.

The tobacco industry is a very unethical industry, due to the long term effects of tobacco on humans. The industry also does not assess the ethical and social responsibility the best way that it should. There are many factors that make the industry unethical; some of the reasons are the way the cigarette companies around the world Advertise, the way governments and cigarette companies make a huge profit from the sales of cigarettes, and the labeling health risks. I do believe however that there is something that the tobacco companies can do to better their strategy as far as their ethics go. I think that they should, always be looking for the best interest on their consumers, as well as advertise strictly

Disclaimer: It is against the The Negotiation Experts' principles to offer its services to the tobacco industry. The Celanese case study has been reproduced for the purposes of study only, and is in no way a condonement of the damage the tobacco is causing.

There are several ethical philosophies in play here regarding the tobacco company and these ethical issues can be explored by analyzing the myriad of interplay of relationships

This case deals with the ethical dilemma that Tobacco manufactures face when selling tobacco products in third world countries. First, there is the ethical dilemma of business versus health. The opening and development of the tobacco business in Third World countries like China, Malaysia, Indonesia, India and Africa, is considered against the health consequences of tobacco use which according to an Oxford University epidemiologist, has estimated to cost 3 million lives annually rising to 10 million by 2050 without effective tobacco control program A second ethical dilemma is employment versus impoverishment, where the opportunities for work in the tobacco industry are considered against a background of malnutrition. This is a problem that

“There are more than 440,000 passings every year in the US caused by tobacco use and presentation to used smoke, and it is assessed that tobacco will add to 1 billion passings worldwide amid the 21st century” (1). Tobacco is a touchy plant to develop, and along these lines needs numerous pesticides, fungicides what's more, herbicides are added to the product all through its developing season. Some tobacco crops get up to sixteen uses of chemicals. Tobacco pesticides hurt winged animals what's more, other little creatures, or potentially cause soil exhaustion; a couple of, like methyl bromide, are known to cause ozone consumption.. “According to the General Accounting Office, every year an estimated 27 million pounds of pesticides are sprayed onto tobacco fields In the United States” (1). Laborers in tobacco fields are presented to these chemicals, causing a large group of issues counting intense harming, growth, sensory system harm and birth absconds. “According to the General Accounting Office, tobacco pesticides include some of the most dangerous pesticides used in the United States”(1). Notwithstanding encountering the wellbeing effects of pesticide utilize, laborers can get "green tobacco

“The Tobacco Control and Regulation of Tobacco Products’ Manufacturing, Packaging and Advertising” is the Lebanon’s smoking ban stated in number 174 of the law which bans smoking in enclosed public areas such as cafes, restaurants, bars, government buildings and offices. The law was signed by 126 out of 128 members of parliament in August 2011(initial ban) and the legislation was enacted in 2012. But this edict had never been applied due to weak rule of law and practically unstable country like Lebanon.