Social Change Plan Research Paper

The Texas anti-abortion law has taken the country’s attention by storm. It is an issue on many different woman’s minds, especially those who live in the state of Texas. The new laws are forcing many woman to have to cross state lines in order to receive an abortion and medical care. This includes woman who needs abortions due to preexisting medical conditions and those who are carrying fetuses which are diseased and are expected not to be born as healthy babies. The Texas Governor Rick Perry and Senator Ted Cruz are leading the fight for the abortion laws to become permanent, laws that are considered the strictest abortion laws that this country has ever seen.

This week, the readings touched on issues relating to resistance and social change. Martinez explains how the U.S. has struggled to see issues of race beyond just Black and white. She also stresses the importance of including other races when speaking on these issues. Hernandez argues that the mainstream feminist movement fails to include minority and low-income women and the issues they face. She states that the movement only benefits white middle class women. Collins explains how people’s ideas and behaviors actualize other people’s inequalities. She says comparing levels of oppression is a competition for attention and instead we should use a new mentality that interlocks these inequalities. Harris

Texas has a long history of conflict with the federal government over laws and policies, particularly when dealing with environmental, social, and educational issues. Texas has conservative right-wing views and has been in conflict more often with the federal government since President Obama has been in office. The dilemma generally arises from a clash in opposing political and social views. One major issue that has arisen in over the course of the last two years has been a battle over funding for Planned Parenthood. Although the courts have deemed that this quarrel is not about abortion rights or access to abortion, the truth of the matter is that it really is. Texas leaders are against abortion and are trying to skirt federal law that allows abortion by imposing their personal agenda opposing abortion or anything that seemingly supports abortion on the Texas people. The problem is that in the midst of this chaos, low-income women of Texas are the ones who are suffering through the loss of basic and preventative healthcare.

Debates are ongoing in the United States as more laws and restrictions are implemented on reproductive care. In 2014 there was a heated debate on whether there should be a mandated coverage for birth control on health insurance plans. According to a survey by the University of Michigan Health System, 69% of adults in the United States support this requirement in health insurance plans and the people who oppose this requirement is less than 10%. There have been other laws made by states recently that are affecting birth control and abortions. For example, a regulation implemented by the Iowa Board of Medicine requires a physician to be physically present when providing a medication abortion; therefore, affecting patients that live in rural area and can not go to the clinics. Such laws on reproductive health care, specifically birth control and abortions, are affecting the access and choices women have. Laws are created to protect rights and choices; therefore, these laws should be created with the intention of protecting women’s rights and choices not hindering them.

This issue has plagued state lawmakers since the late 1980’s and many remain at odds over how to approach the problem. Some states have attempted to criminalize prenatal drug use or treat it as grounds for terminating parental rights, while others have placed a priority on making drug treatment more readily available to pregnant women. The issue shows the difficulty policymakers face in attempting to balance the autonomy and bodily integrity of pregnant women with society’s interest in ensuring the birth of healthy children. For advocated of women’s reproductive rights, it raises the question of whether the state can ever be justified in regulating a pregnant woman’s behavior in the interest of protecting her fetus and whether such policies potentially undermine the legality of

Texas continues to fight women’s rights groups for the life of the “unborn child” and has won on many levels. According to the Texas Abortion Laws, Texas includes mandatory ultrasound imaging and parental consent for minors, and women must make at least four visits to a doctor and receive an ultrasound. Women may only receive a third trimester abortion if it is necessary to prevent death or substantial risk of serious impairment to a women’s physical or mental health, or if fetus has severe and irreversible abnormality. Texas considers an illegal abortion if it destroys the vitality or life of child in birth or before (which otherwise would have been born alive); operating a facility without a license, failure to meet Board of Health standards, or failure to make reports to Department of Health; act preformed after pregnancy with intent to cause termination of pregnancy other than for purpose of birth of live fetus or removal

The battle for women’s reproductive rights is similar to the struggle for African Americans to have “the full liberty of speech in public and private” as Dredd Scott found out in 1865 when he petitioned for his personal freedom from slavery and lost. Moreover women’s reproductive rights are akin to defending the rights of racial equality, civil rights, desegregation, same sex marriage, and universal human rights. Every individual should have the right to choose how to live his or her private life in today’s society without governmental interference or control.

The Center for Reproductive Rights is an organization that dedicates itself to the advancement of law to protect and ensure that women globally have “access to the best reproductive healthcare available; where every woman can exercise her choices without coercion or discrimination.” (“About Us.”, n.d.) Furthermore, the Center for Reproductive Rights works in more than fifty countries to bring awareness to and advocate for a verity of topics ranging from safe and affordable contraception and abortion, healthy pregnancy, and the protection of those in vulnerable positions such as young people and those with communicable diseases. (“Our Issues.”, n.d.) The organization has achieved a myriad of policy and legal accomplishments in the twenty years

It is pleasing to know that you currently have direct experience working with social change policy and that you are making a difference within your community. In most major cities, the homeless are often overlooked yet this stigmatized group is vulnerable for many reasons (e.g., health related issues, substance dependence, etc.). Nevertheless, policy allows one to take social and political action against social conditions that impact the lives of clients. Great

Reproductive health policies have always been controversial in the United States. There are diverging views of what should be considered policy and what should not be considered. There are differing views on how far reproductive and sexual health policies should go to protect the rights of all citizens in reproductive and family planning matters. Despite the differing opinions and uncertainty in how to proceed with reproductive health policies, there is one thing that is certain. Sexual and reproductive health outcomes in the US are worse than most other high-income countries even though we spend more on health care per capita.

Social can be considers as the workers practices, the association elements, framework and methods. Changing the association society is a standout amongst the most difficult, danger and instability of the association. Be that as it may, the right association society can prompt enhanced execution and can get upper hand and corporate achievement. With a specific end goal to survive, associations and their way of life should ceaselessly develop and change. Administrators and pioneers must utilize a decent initiative ability to fit with the association and their way of life. The reason of the way of life change is to spur representatives, expand the qualities and objectives of staff and the authoritative administrator are firmly adjusted, decrease working environment issues and push. As a result, the association can accomplishment with an extremely solid culture and support the individual representatives execution and coordinated the relationship between stakeholders.(Hayes,2010).

One of the most controversial topics being discussed in today’s society is the concept of reproductive rights. According to the Salem Press Encyclopedia, reproductive rights provide individuals with the freedom to make sexual and reproductive decisions (Caffrey, 2014). Reproductive rights provide both men and women the opportunity to seek reproductive healthcare and education. Additionally, these rights are designed to provide individuals and couples with the opportunity to decide whether or not they would like to have children throughout their lives. Some services available to these individuals are the right to birth control and other contraceptive options, abortion, sexually transmitted disease testing, and much more. Although reproductive rights do aide to include the rights of men and women, this paper will focus specifically on the reproductive rights of girls and women. Studies show there is an importance around the idea of  girls and women being able to have control of their own bodies.

The road to equality has been long and winding for the American woman, due to the ingrained social standards (expectations and limitations) that have been inflicted upon women for centuries. Had it not been for women like Margaret Sanger and countless others, the modern American woman might still be in such a profound state of subservience and suppressed freedoms. Today there are outlets for women to take control in all spheres, where once that was deemed unacceptable. But, some of these outlets are being closed off by the federal government, among them being Planned Parenthood and politicians are attacking the idea of a woman taking charge of her reproductive health in favor of a society that refuses to accommodate a woman’s right to choose. This limitation violates her 1st amendment rights – a step that the first American feminists would strongly oppose.

The United States is known as the home of the free, home for those who can have any religion, and have free speech. But women’s rights in the Unites States have been silenced and taken control of for a longtime. Throughout U.S. history women’s power and place in society has been diminished because of patriarchy. The overwhelming number of men in the government has made women’s right to reproductive health one of the most controversial issues in politics. Every year new laws and bills get passed that seems to limit women’s choice about their own body. The government has taken into its own hand to decide what women should do in regard to their health and life. The government has declared a war on women and has limited their rights year after year while not taking into consideration of women’s health. States are becoming and more hostile toward women and their reproductive rights. Closing abortion clinics, limiting insurance coverage, prohibiting abortion medicine, and prohibiting abortion are ways the government has taken control of women’s rights. From 2011 to 2015, a record number of Anti-Women’s Reproductive health legislations have been passed to limit or stop a woman’s right to choice.

A Term Paper Assignment Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the requirements for the Project Design, Planning and Implementation Course, part of Master of Arts in Project Planning and Management (PPM)