Social Facilitation Affects A Person's Performance

Obedience and Conformity Both obedience and conformity involve social pressure in obedience the pressure comes from behaving as you are instructed to do; whereas in conformity the pressure comes from group norms Behaviour in obedience is determined by social power, whereas in conformity it is influenced mostly by the need for acceptance. In nearly all societies, certain people are given power and authority over others. Our society, for example, parents, teachers, and managers are invested with various degrees of authority. Most of the time, this does not cause any problems.

First, an individual usually internalizes compliance, but this is not necessarily the case in obedience. The latter can occur through internalization as well as through the existence of cognitive dissonance. In other words, conformity is a form of social influence that emanates from within the individual (Milgram, 2010). As it has been mentioned earlier, one does not have to be asked to do something for them to do it in the case of conformity. It is a decision they make due to the external pressures caused by group influence or the influence of another individual. Compliance is ethologically a survival tactic whereby one is forced to do certain things to fit in the group as doing the contrary will make them appear odd. This is not the case in

The definition of desocialization First, the institutional staff try to erode the residents' identities and independence. Strategies to erode identities include forcing individuals to surrender all personal possessions, get uniform haircuts and wear standardized clothing. Two examples of desocialization are when Jane cut all her hair so it would be easier to like run and the hair not being in her way. Another one is when she stop acting like a girl and started acting like a men when she was fighting with master schiff in the mission and she said “suck my dick.” The definition of resocialization is radically changing a person's personality by carefully controlling the environment. Two examples of this is when jane decided to think like a men and also act like a men, cut her

The fundamental attribution error intrigued me while reading the book because I came across the example about Hurricane Katrina. I lived through this experience so I felt it was only right that I talk about my take. The definition of the fundamental attribution error is assuming someone’s personality based on their actions, even when there are powerful outside forces that can be influencing them. Hurricane Katrina was a horrible natural disaster that no one could have predicted would happen but none the less it happened. I remember my family and I watching the news together and coming to the crippling conclusion that we had to leave everything we had behind. Of course, we were used to this because we lived in what they call “the soup bowl” and we were used to emergency evacuations for hurricanes. There was no

Produce a written piece of work which outlines the meaning of conformity, you should consider compliance with common practices, social norms, the role of self-esteem, the purpose of uniforms, and the relevance of conformity in the Uniformed Public Services. You also need to outline obedience as an act, practice or quality, the following of orders, conscious and unconscious obedience, compliance, status as a factor in obedience, influences, fear, reward, love, respect and the relevance of obedience in the Uniformed Public Services. Compliance is being obedient to rules or orders given to you. Obedience is the act of following orders without question because they come from a genuine authority.

Conformity Conformity is when someone complies with standards, rules, or laws. Non conformity is the failure or refusal to conform to a prevailing rule or practice. An example of non conformity is me talking while the teacher is talking. An example of conformity is me raising my hand to answer a question in class.

can be explained in terms of Psychology. That makes me believe that the study is not easy at all.

Conformity: Compliance with standards, rules, or laws. Behavior in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. Americans have been fighting in a tug of war with each other, are we individualistic society or are we a society where everybody is similar? I believe this has been swaying back and forth, where recently the swing has been going towards the individual side. Nowadays you see a lot of Americans fighting for what they believe in. We see that trend slowly growing in the youth. In the article Of Me I Sing: Americans Construct an Opt-Out Society, Alan Greenblatt claims that, “Americans want to go their own way. The right of individuals to question authority is one the strongest facets of American life. But the ability to

Implicit personality theory, negative halo, attribution theory, ought self, and relational uppers are 5 specific concepts from chapter 3 that relate to the film. Implicit personality theory is “ the theory that we rely on a set of a few characteristics to draw inferences about others and use these inferences as the basis of our communication with them” (Richard and Turner 62). The way a person acts is a way that we believe communicate back. In the short clip of Cipher in the Snow, Cliff was quiet and kept to himself, because of this no one reached out to him.

What is it to Conform or to not conform? Conformity is compliance with standards or rules. Non- conformity is to think freely. To be the one square in a room with a bunch of circles. With conformity, you are either one of the many standing in line with the others or the one standing out amongst the crowd. Boxer is what we would call a conformist, while Mr. Leonardo was non-conformist. Boxer was a fine horse who did what he was told. Mr. Leonard was a nice kept man who simply loved to take walks.

People have been changing their behavior or obeying someone else’s commands for years. This continues today in our everyday lives. Conformity and obedience seem similar but differ in several ways. Conformity is defined by psychologists as a change in behavior or belief to accord with others. Similar to this, is obedience. Obedience is defined acting in accordance with a direct order or command. Normally people conform to reap a reward or to avoid punishment. If we comply with a direct order or command it is considered obedience. Most of the time when people comply, it is to be accepted among others so they are not seen as outsiders. On the other hand, when we obey, we are obeying a command an authority figure

We were told to define three terms for this assignment. Those terms are: fundamental attribution error, cognitive dissonance, and diffusion of responsibility. To start off I will go with fundamental attribution error. I went online and looked at different websites to see what it means. To put it in my words would be as someone is having an attitude towards a specific event or situation without knowing exactly what's going on with the other person or situations perspective. An example would be as I'm arguing with my mother that's living out of state because of her inability to come down for the holidays but I didn't know it's because she is going through a tough time financially.

An example is I was in Starbucks and someone bumped into me, a fundamental attribution would be I assume the person to be rude. Perhaps, it could be because the person was in a rush and was going to be late for work. Another example is one day I walked into a classroom and saw a girl sitting quietly at a table and doing her work. According to the attribution error, I though she was a shy and quiet person.

Social interaction, one of the few social necessities of humans, is the backbone of human behavior. Consequently, I observed the different social interactions between the people who took public transportation and the students in the main lounge of my dorm. The reason I decided to compare the two was due to their differences in setting as well as the varying levels of familiarity between the actors. The dorm lounge was the hangout of the actors (students). The lounge promoted social interactions because the chairs faced towards each other. In comparison, the bus was the polar opposite when it came to the physical setting since it fostered a sense of solidarity. The placement of the chairs were in rows so that the only thing that the actors (working class individuals and students) would be facing the back of the person sitting in front of them. Before starting this experiment, I hypothesized that the majority of the commuters would likely keep to themselves, whereas the students in the lounge, due to familiarity, would converse with other students. One of the biggest challenges that I came across during the bus ride was that many people kept to themselves and had few interactions. In contrast, the students in the lounge made it difficult to keep accurate data as they tried to talk to me.

The authors conducted an experiment to test a social facilitation theory based on a single attribution on a certain level of task. The present study tested effect of distraction based on using two-line comparison of performance. We built two groups which were (a) control groups who do memory test alone and (b) experimental groups who do test with a confederate. We give another replaced purpose when we requested consent from participants for confirming the validity for experiment. The study found no significant effect on memory task under distraction. Furthermore, the presence of others does not appear necessary on simple task. The following discussion will give the explanation of unexpected results.hirty University of British Columbia undergraduates volunteered to participate in exchange for completing their research project in various psychology classes. Sixteen participants served in experimental