Social Group Project Analysis

Collaboration Is to help people in each other's needs. The individual cannot bear all the burdens of this life alone. Many of us hate cooperation and helping others. Especially in school when we have a project and the teacher asks us to help and get into group, some of us would say I will do it alone or I would prefer to withdraw and do the whole project alone.

Through out the process of creating our project as a group there wasn’t as many obstacles as I thought there would be. In other words, everything went smooth it was just what I wanted. I believe the reason for such great outcome was because we all learned how to work as a group and interact with each other because of our Chicano studies class. Knowing what we did wrong in group projects in that class certainly made me change and understand what group studies really are and mean. Therefore, there wasn’t any problems as a group we communicated well and if a person couldn’t meet up we would let them know how they could contribute and certainly they did their part.

As a student of Santa Ana College, I have recently had the privilege to work on a group project. Our group assignment based upon making a postcard for our school. In which this highlights the importance of one of the facilities that Santa Ana College provides for the students. As a group, we choose the Child Care Center as our topic for the postcard. As I worked in the group, I felt respected and valued. I felt that my group volunteered and contributed equally. We decided that two of us would work on the postcard and the other two would work on the essay. As we continued with our project, we divided the work evenly in order to finish on time. My group and I had different tasks in order, and we worked together afterschool

I think group projects are very helpful. Maybe somebody in the group doesn’t understand something. So another person in the group can show them how to do it. You can also talk to people you’ve never talked to before, you might be able to help someone, moreover someone might be able to help you.

The human brain is constantly looking for negativity. For example, after we clean the floor, I try looking for spots that I did clean that look dirtier than the rest, or when I buy a cup of lemonade from Chick-fil-A and there's pulp in it. All I can taste after that is the pulp. However, some people condition their minds to only see the positives. In high school, I had this friend named Beth Johnson. Beth is around 5 feet tall, loves giraffes, and has never said a negative word about someone or situation. Beth and I had this group project with three other people who are athletes and, since they were athletes, they believed they could tell excuses for not doing their part. At the end of the project, Beth and I both put over $300 into our project

This document contains information on the device constructed for Team Project 2. The task was to design, fabricate, and test a device that transports a set of identical balls from one container to another of equal size and shape, for a total of three containers. In addition, a clear audible sound needs to generate right before the balls transported into the next container with a time interval of 5 seconds in between. Constraints include a maximum diagonal dimension of 24 inches and a weight not to exceed 5 pounds. The figure of merit with our quantities is provided in table 1.

In my last year of high school, I joined the Yearbook team and it was the biggest team project that I have ever done. Working with thirty members to create this huge project became my most memorable achievement. Through writing and interviewing students for over eight months, the book meant to be as a collection of my team’s memory rather than a record of school events.

I have often dreaded group projects, throughout my 4 years at Dalhousie University, I’ve never really had a good experience with them. So going into this class, my expectations were really low. I didn’t expect that I would actually enjoy working on these modules, and so much that I’ve worked with the same team for all 3 modules. This arrangement has allowed us to continue to develop our writing, research and presentations skills, as well as improve upon weaknesses, in our previous modules as well as personal skills that we want to improve. Personally, through these modules I have developed my presentations skills further, and through this particular module, I learned how to approach a problem or project from a different perspective, from different stakeholders.

My project involves the group CUSE Eats. Our events have started, which is nice because we finally have the opportunity to dive in and start our projects. We have three smaller projects that everyone can be a part of which consist of doing the Try Me dinners in the dining hall where we let student sample certain foods, the apple NY Crunch day and Walktober which is the Monday walk. I think overall we have finally started to get how the projects work and what we should be doing.

However, despite this, actually working together was extremely difficult to do. Every person did their portion of the work, and were incredibly nice, but it took them far too long to complete their slides. To begin, our group did not have a solid concept for our presentation for quite some time and nobody was pitching any ideas. We started out wanting to discuss women’s clothing as well as part in society throughout time; however, we eventually settled on westernized ideas of Arab women. Yet, even after finally deciding what topic to research, the group was fairly disorganized as well as unwilling to meet. I had suggested meeting times quite often and nobody would respond. However, when we did eventually meet and work on the project, my group members were nothing but efficient and hardworking. I suppose this problem was just based on different work ethics, yet I still wish they were more responsive to my messages and

Once this project was announced, I honestly thought that this would be fun and an easy A. I thought that we had all the good connections amongst the two classes that we would easily be able to convince the student body of anything. Even when I heard that we had to break into three groups, I thought to myself that it would be fine. However, my whole idea of this project changed within about ten minutes of the assignment.

There will be a meeting that all group members are required to attend on Tuesday, September 20th. The meeting will take place at the fourth floor of the University Library at 10 A.M. We will discuss about what company we are going to analyze for our team project and we will also talk about each person’s role and responsibilities for the project. The discussion that we are going to have is important critical to our success on this project, therefore makes it a mandatory meeting for all group members.

I believe that our group worked well together, but this assignment was a lot harder then I thought it would be. Although there were only 5 members, there were different personalities and ALL members were very opinionated and set in doing things their way. It took a while before synergy and cohesion formed within the group. However, I strongly feel that ALL members were 100% committed to this project and wanted to do the very best job possible. I think this is why there was some conflict (and by that I mean very little) because ALL members were committed and cared about this assignment that much. We all put in the effort to make this project the bets it can be.

Other Comments (as needed):_This was one of the hardest groups I have ever had to work in throughout my college career. We had to very strong personality’s that did not work well with each other (Carolyn and Natalie). First off Jen was great to work with. Many times she was the one to start the project and would email everyone what she was working on. She worked very hard on this unit and I think a lot of the success is due to her hard work. Natalie also put a lot of work and time into this unit. Jen, Natalie and I all worked really well with each other and could communicate ideas and what needed to get done without their being a problem. Larry was a team player but did do much other than write his lessons. If we asked if he would do something

The project is addressed as an analytical site-specific based, that focuses to create a stronger coherence between public life with plans for existing building structures. The design approach for this project is studio experimentation. Through action and reflection process, the practice works in relation to extrapolate probability and plausibility for Sydney urban public space - as a metaphor of improvisation. This method includes observation, computer modelling, and 3d models/maquettes.