Social Identity Analysis Paper

The social identity matrix project was a complex task to complete in general. Complex in the sense that it was not hard, but more so of me having to think about each of the different the identity categories that had to be filled out. Personally, I have not ever sat down to contemplate about each of the different categories. For example, the only time that each of these categories have ever became relevant is when I have had an experience with someone else bringing it to attention. Whether, it was my race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual identity. While, it does not surprise me how complex it was for me to focus on things I do not talk about but I fully understand each of the categories. Above all, I know who I am and I can only hope people see the person I portray to be.

This essay will be looking to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the social identity theory with studies to support.

What is personal identity? This question has been asked and debated by philosophers for centuries. The problem of personal identity is determining what conditions and qualities are necessary and sufficient for a person to exist as the same being at one time as another. Some think personal identity is physical, taking a materialistic perspective believing that bodily continuity or physicality is what makes a person a person with the view that even mental things are caused by some kind of physical occurrence. Others take a more idealist approach with the belief that mental continuity is the sole factor in establishing personal identity holding that physical things are just reflections of the mind.

1. Any theory of personal identity should be able to solve two problems: first, the problem of individuation; second, the problem of continuity or persistence. How would you in your own words characterize these problems? Also, do these problems matter at all? Are they actually important? Why or why not?

I thought it was a costume party. That is until the creatures of the night showed their true identity. An hour later -

Based on the book, I would say yes, there is an American Identity which can be described as a unique unity. Steinbeck talks about how his journey wouldn’t have the same feedback of the trip to someone from a different country, who went through the same experience. This is because they wouldn’t yield the same memories. “If other Americans reading this account should feel it true, that agreement would only mean that we are alike in our Americanness.(pg.209)” Steinbeck then goes into detail about how, because we are all drawn from different ethnicities, we are all more alike than we are different. I think that this is an accurate description of the uniqueness that the United States withholds; other countries don’t have as much diversity that

beliefs. Sober uses the example of lightning. He points out that according to the Greeks,

My family shaped my personal and social identity at a micro level by being the first set of influencers the moment I was born. My personal identity is significantly influenced by my family through the approach that my parents have taken to raise and nurture me. The results of my parents raising me is shown through the behaviour and beliefs that I embody. For example, because of my family I have always been aware that there is a God. In consequence, my compliant behaviour towards religion has already been constructed at a young age. Moreover, my social identity’s structure was shaped by my family through they way they have socially interacted with me. My micro level interactions with my family throughout time has created a deeply rooted influence within me. The influence that my family has had on my social identity is demonstrated in the way that I respond in certain social situations. For example, through behavioural observation as a child I have learned not to speak back to my parents when they are lecturing me.

Who are you? Who am I? These are questions that we all ponder at some point or another in our lives. As human beings we are seemingly inundated with the desire to classify and categorise. We are constantly defining and analysing the differences that we observe in the world, it seems only natural that we would apply this method of classification to our position within our society. More specifically, we want to understand our social identities and this can be achieved by acknowledging which groups we identify most with.

Ever since the beginning of this exercise, I have been curious as to if there were any patterns within individual characteristics that change the likelihood of someone being prosocial or proself. All three articles deal with understanding the differences between prosocials and proselfs. The article written in 2001 establishes a difference in prosocials and proselfs. This research shows that prosocials, as compared to proselfs, will “simultaneously pursue the following goals in interdependence situations: (1) maximize own outcomes, (2) maximize joint outcomes, and (3) achieving equality in outcomes” (De Cremer & Van Lange 2001: S15). The 2008 article deals with the different behaviors associated with egotists and altruists. Building off the

Identity refers to structured sense of self, which manipulates itself in threads of life (Burr, 2015). Figure 1 of Tūrangawaewae shows individuals identity can be classified under our age, our gender (male or female), the values and beliefs we share (religious or non- religious), the experiences ( good or bad), the people we surround ourselves with (friends and family), also not limited to, from our genetic inheritance (ancestors or parents). However, identity threads are not pre inherited but are pre-constructed idea influenced by social experiences (Kahu, 2015). I am a woman, 21 years of age, Christian by faith, Fijian Indian by ethnicity. I use mind set of goals to convey through my identity. For example, excelling

Establish an Identity: When in this first task the couple is trying to establish marriage and themes. Some of these themes include values, goals, and priorities to have within the marriage. In this task the couple is also establishing separation and connection this is where the couple is figuring out how to let go of there own family and now begin to start their own. With this step also comes the negotiation of marriage rolls during this step the couple is sharing their own perspectives for behavior and behavior with social situations (Conjugal rolls & Counter rolls).

When Henri Tajfel and John Turner came up the self and social identity theory, they set out to explain the value of understanding self worth. Every human as a desire to feel a sense of belonging, but that problem is not a simple as just sitting next to someone and saying these two people should feel connected. The heart of this issue is often psychologist greatest challenge in cure a person metal state. This paper will first look at what is self and social identity from a psychologist issue, than how the power of the gospel as the ability to change that.

In order to increase our self-image we enhance the status of the group to which we belong. For example, TISS is a top ranked university in India. We can also increase our self-image by discriminating and holding prejudice views against the out group (the group we don’t belong to). For example, the other slightly lower ranked institutes. Therefore we have divided students into “them” and “us” based through a process of social categorization.

Humans, by nature are social creatures. A human's ability to be able to live effectively together and communicate with language is what differentiates humans from other species. When humans interact with each other it gives them a sense of comfort, unity and belonging. Through the connection everyone has with one another humans also feel a sense of purpose and meaning in their daily lives. Families, friends and partners are all considered important individuals to most humans. Close relationships with others would be acknowledged as a valuable component in a human’s life. These relationships are nurtured, given attention and taken care off carefully to ensure the relationship remains healthy. More specifically a relationship is given love, care and both individuals must trust one another in order to develop and build a strong and lasting relationship. In the image taken by Garry Winogrand, a simple image displays a greater meaning when analyzed. The photo carries out an important and clear message about humans and their ability to connect and interact with each other, and how it is essential to humans. Each component of the image has a distinct and important meaning. The image’s message is depicted when the location, the specific contents of the image and the year in which the photo was taken is thoroughly examined. Relationships are a vital necessity in a human’s life because it greater increases efficient cooperation with each other, their emotional