Social Identity Paper

In “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” by Peggy McIntosh, the message that the author is trying to get across is that white men have privilege they have the freedom to do more than women without being coitized or judged by society. Women, and men of color are often judged as a race, an action of an individual of a different ethnicity or race whether it be positive or negative is reflected onto others of the same ethnicity. Individuals of color are constantly faced with racism and discrimination. This article connects to gender and women’s study, because we strive for equality. Only with equality can the society be fair, without privilege everyone would have the same opportunities and resources available. Women and men will be

What is personal identity? This question has been asked and debated by philosophers for centuries. The problem of personal identity is determining what conditions and qualities are necessary and sufficient for a person to exist as the same being at one time as another. Some think personal identity is physical, taking a materialistic perspective believing that bodily continuity or physicality is what makes a person a person with the view that even mental things are caused by some kind of physical occurrence. Others take a more idealist approach with the belief that mental continuity is the sole factor in establishing personal identity holding that physical things are just reflections of the mind.

In our world, white men have held the most power and have done the most gruesome things with it. Whites hold the most influence when it comes to political elections and the workforce. Women are often seen as inferior to men in most work-related, important jobs. ‘’Elected politicians in the United States are overwhelmingly white (90%) and male (71%). While men of color make up 19% of the population, they account for only 7% of elected officials.

White (male) privilege comprises of having more access to resources, having normative assumptions of self-worth, and escaping consequences like being discriminated against just on the basis of one’s race (Neville, Spanierman, & Lewis, 2012). There are seven core components of White (male) privilege (Neville, Spanierman, & Lewis, 2012). The first core component is that While (male) privilege differentially benefits Whites on the basis of social group membership, including class, gender, and sexual orientation. Further, differentially benefits Whites, means that Whites benefits vary based on their social membership group. An example

In my recent adult life, I have always liked to joke around about my association with every agent group in contemporary America as a straight, white, able-bodied, middle class, Christian, European, suburban, cis-gendered male from a nuclear family in the Midwest. It feels at times that I was plucked from a 1950’s advertisement. Additionally, through most of my life, I was surrounded by people who share the same identity and did not get regularly exposed to difference until I came to Ohio State. As a result, I found it difficult to acknowledge or discuss privilege as it was never something I had to do until I came to college. In this reflection, I will examine what privilege means to me, my experience in the male agent group, and my experience in the suburban agent group.

Peggy McIntosh concludes white privilege is, “an invisible package of unearned assets which I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was meant to remain oblivious.” The writer came to this conclusion when observing male privilege initially in America. McIntosh discusses the lack of acknowledgement of men when it came to addressing their own advantages over women even if they could admit the position of disadvantage of women. This shed light on how white privilege is curtailed; In the United States, foundations of our society are interlaced with institutionalized privilege creates unethical levels of dominance; dominance of males over females, whites over people of color,

My family shaped my personal and social identity at a micro level by being the first set of influencers the moment I was born. My personal identity is significantly influenced by my family through the approach that my parents have taken to raise and nurture me. The results of my parents raising me is shown through the behaviour and beliefs that I embody. For example, because of my family I have always been aware that there is a God. In consequence, my compliant behaviour towards religion has already been constructed at a young age. Moreover, my social identity’s structure was shaped by my family through they way they have socially interacted with me. My micro level interactions with my family throughout time has created a deeply rooted influence within me. The influence that my family has had on my social identity is demonstrated in the way that I respond in certain social situations. For example, through behavioural observation as a child I have learned not to speak back to my parents when they are lecturing me.

…offers up particular notions of agency in which white working class and middle class men are allowed to see themselves as oppressed and lacking because their masculinity has been compromised by and subordinated to those social and economic spheres and needs that constitute the realm of the feminine.

The social identity matrix project was a complex task to complete in general. Complex in the sense that it was not hard, but more so of me having to think about each of the different the identity categories that had to be filled out. Personally, I have not ever sat down to contemplate about each of the different categories. For example, the only time that each of these categories have ever became relevant is when I have had an experience with someone else bringing it to attention. Whether, it was my race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual identity. While, it does not surprise me how complex it was for me to focus on things I do not talk about but I fully understand each of the categories. Above all, I know who I am and I can only hope people see the person I portray to be.

B. In Tashlin’s book the bear was told that he was not a bear and society convinces to change his identity.

Social identity theory proposed by Tajfel & Turner (2004) is a theory of group membership and behaviour which has made significant contributions in explaining in-group favouritism, out-group denigration, competition and other interactions of an individual among social groups (Korte, 2007; Brown, 2000; Tajfel & Turner, 2004). Social identity theory can be defined as an individual’s sense of who they are based on the group that they belong to through a process of self-categorisation and depersonalisation (Tajfel & Turner, 2004). In this essay, I will define social identity theory through its three mental processes involved in group evaluation which are: social identification which is a process whereby we are placed into certain

My social identity plays a huge part in shaping and defining my role as a leader. The way I view myself combined with the way that others view me frames the narrative of my opportunities to be a leader in many ways. Of my various social identity characteristics, the two that play the largest part in my life are my gender and appearance as a woman and my economic standing as lower middle class.

Identity is a state of mind in which someone recognizes/identifies their character traits that leads to finding out who they are and what they do and not that of someone else. In other words it's basically who you are and what you define yourself as being. The theme of identity is often expressed in books/novels or basically any other piece of literature so that the reader can intrigue themselves and relate to the characters and their emotions. It's useful in helping readers understand that a person's state of mind is full of arduous thoughts about who they are and what they want to be. People can try to modify their identity as much as they want but that can never change. The theme of identity is a very strenuous topic to understand

Some real world examples of how one thinks about themselves before and/or after they know what they think are how they act and react with others. “We are not only our brother’s keeper; in countless large and small ways, we are our brother’s maker ~ Bonaro Overstreet” (Adler & Rodman, 2006, p. 49). One wants conformation of the facts as they are seen by themselves and others. If one thinks they are green and everyone else thinks they are red, they might begin to believe they are red and plug that in to their self-perception. These colors might already be bringing things to mind about one’s identity because of what is associated with colors, for instance. Red might be associated with fire and halting, and green might be associated with nature

Many people feel uncomfortable showing certain parts of their identity, as they might be ashamed of it. It has been considered for a long while that, to protect one’s wellbeing, it is beneficial to hide the negative aspects of one’s self. However, in 2014, professor Manuela Barreto from the University of Exeter have found that hiding stigmatised identity may, in fact, decrease your belongingness to the group. Baretto and colleagues asked participants to hide their stigmatised identity when interacting and then measured the quality of the interaction. Not only they found that hiding negatively affect feelings of belongingness, but also they found that other person felt like the interaction was less authentic, leading a person not only to feel