Social Justice in India

Equality, fairness, and equal distribution are concepts that are embedded in social justice. Individuals living in harmony for mutual benefit living in a state of society are set out by social contract. This paper will firstly show, the background of the philosophy of social justice. Then it will focus on John Rawls Theory of Justice. Secondly, It addresses the stages of the Theory of Justice, It then historical nature of social justice in conjunction with western philosophy. Lastly it will look at the diversity of philosophical and ethical thought.

Historically, India was under British rule until 1950. Many people in India felt that during British rule they were powerless (Beteille, 2010). All of the problems in the country were blamed on this helplessness (Beteille, 2010). When India became independent and developed its own constitution, a large amount of emphasis was placed on the role of government in solving social problems (Beteille, 2010). During British rule, many customs and practices in India were based on the Hindu religion (Beteille, 2010). The British left those in place, neither making them unlawful nor supporting them (Beteille, 2010). When the new government was established, the caste system that had so sharply defined India was declared unlawful (Beteille, 2010). While this was a step in the

Social injustice can have a devastating and crippling effect on persons, both physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. Injustice carries with it the potential to trigger life events that negatively affect individuals’ health, lifestyle, and relationships with family members, friends, and the workplace (Hays & Erford, 2014). Currently, in the United States, there are many and more individuals and groups who struggle to overcome past and present prejudices in the areas of housing, education, differential treatment, discrimination, child exploitation, and racial profiling. Barrett (2011) found that multidimensional issues associated with the biological, psychological, and societal differences among persons, social justice, and fundamental human rights many times prevent practitioners from supplying adequate services to all the peoples of a town, area, or country. The complexities of national, state and public administration have generated institutional inequity that is so entrenched within communities that “professional standards and documents and United Nations Conventions and Declarations are not enough” (Barrett, 2011, p. 5). To understand and apply the construct of multicultural counseling and social justice as interdependent and interactive forces practitioners and researchers should analyze and fine-tune traditional counseling theories and methodologies using a systems approach.

According to Quotes About Injustice (n.d.), “In the beginning there was only a small amount of injustice abroad in the world, but everyone who came afterwards added their portion, always thinking it was very small and unimportant, and look where we have ended up today” (Quotes About Injustice, n.d.). In this paper I will be talking about the injustices in the criminal justice system and the criminal justice procedures. Injustices in the Criminal Justice System According to Meadows (2001, pg.

Through the social work profession, social justice inhibits a motivation to aid and identify with a designated population through a humanitarian perspective. As social workers, we have an incredible desire to collaborate with colleagues with similar vision to discover a solution to the concerns of the client that comprises of the social justice.

I did some research on social justice competencies and today I am going to discuss with you my findings. I am going to talk about why social justice matters, social justice with counselors and counseling psychologists, social justice competencies with group workers, and social justice paradigm. Social justice is the opinion of which every person ought to have equal rights and chances whether they be financial, governmental or social. Human service helper’s goal is to unlock the gates to gain accessibility and chance for every person, especially the ones that need it the most. A quick look at the various functions of human service helpers displays in what way this worth system gives emphasis to all that they do. Human service helpers will aid their homeless clients to obtain government assistance, food share, and care for their wellbeing. Human service helpers thrive to defend and safeguard their elderly client’s economic right and guarantee the client is getting the health and economic advantages that lawfully belong to them. Human service helpers furthermore utilize social-justice values and beliefs to underlying issues in the human service organizations where they are employed. ("Social Justice," n.d.)

Oppression consists of an individual or group limiting another’s actions or choices, and exists in many forms, including violence, intimidation, laws, and social exclusion. I believe oppression stems from the belief that a group of individuals – or sole individuals – are better than, or worth more as humans than others. With this presumption the oppressor constrains the oppressed by limiting their rights, intimidating them as to prevent them from acting in a certain way, or ostracizing them in a social setting.

CNN, Fox News, USA Today. These mainstream outlets are popular for a reason. As a convenience for American citizens, to have news literally projected on television is a luxury. Not just any sort of news - a wide variety of topics such as politics, entertainment, economics and sports are projected twenty four hours per day, seven days a week. According to the Pew Research Center, writers Kenneth Olmstead, Mark Jurkowitz, Amy Mitchell and Jodi Edna report that, “Almost three out of four U.S adults (71%) watch local and network television news … on average, the cable news audience devotes twice as much time to that news source as local and network news”(Olmstead et al). In other words, not only do the majority of Americans spend time watching

“Justice” is a term that should not only prefer to different portions of distribution, but also to the institutional conditions to develop individual capabilities, as well as cooperative communication. Under this conception of justice, many people in the U.S. consider disciplinary justice as an appropriate approach to sustain social order. However, it seems like there are more chances that the minorities are targets of the inequality in justice system, especially in socio-economic and political problems.

There are advocates for rectifying historical injustice in which it is the responsibility of contemporary society to address victims or off-spring of past victims by providing compensation (Spinner-Haldev 575). There is a discontinuity in history and complexity in regards to a sufficient compensation value. The other view is to solely concentrate on current injustices and focus on resolving contemporary issues (Spinner-Haldev 575). This neglects the role of collective memory of groups subject to oppression which could lead to mistrust in the government to act in a just manner. Spinner-Haldev suggests that we understand how past injustices have shaped our current standing and address current issues by respecting injustices of the past. This avoids the subject of responsibility for compensation while focusing on both relevant features involved in current social injustices. This entire argument deals with the role of responsibility which is an important aspect to consider in the two options

Justice is the fairness in protection of rights and punishment of wrongs, although this may be the case the legal system is corrupt, as it often gives people unfair or delayed trials and makes decisions which are not in the national interest. Criminals are often let off lightly, or not imprisoned, while many innocent people are often detained for years. High costs, duplication and retrials advantage the rich. There are conflicts of interest between judges and those controlling the system. People are wrongfully convicted. Defamation laws suppress corruption by causing people and the media a fear to speak out. That being said history has also shown that riots for justice has also taken too long to even get the message across; let alone take full

INDIAN CRIMINAL LAW REFORMS FAVORING REFORMS FOR WOMEN IN SOCIETY – A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE JUSCTICE MALIMATH COMMITTEE REPORT OF 2003 AND THE JUSTICE VERMA COMMITTEE REPORT OF 2012 WOMEN

The notion of justice is existence of proper balance of rights and its access under the laws of land. It refers to not depriving any person from availing privileges, opportunities etc. John Rawls writes, "Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override"It means that the interaction in a society must be free from any sort of discrimination such as religion, race, color, caste or sex. It ensures fair distribution of assets and equal opportunity. José P. Laurel defines Social Justice as “Social justice is neither communism, nor despotism, nor atomism, nor anarchy, but the humanization of laws and the equalization of social and economic forces by the state so that justice in its rational and objectively secular conception may at least be approximated.”

This is illustrating how the concept of justice is continually evolving based upon changing social norms and values. To fully understand what is taking place requires focusing on moral justice and how it is influencing society. This will be accomplished by studying one of the selections from the justice section in the book World of Ideas. Together, these elements will provide

Most social movements in India since the 1970s have actively used the Courts-especially the Supreme Court-as a part of their struggles. This has been possible because of the higher Courts’ activism, especially under the guidance and action of Public Interest Litigation. Through the instrument of Public Interest Litigation, the Court liberated itself from traditional constraints in the legal system so as to reach out ‘to the weaker sections of Indian humanity.