Social Media Ruining Politics Analysis

Decent Essays
The Corruption of Politics
Mainstream media has changed the view of American politics. It has turned into an “echo chamber,” filtering results around bias and personal opinion. Overtime, media has slowly, but surely polarized the American people. Researchers tend to have a significant amount of evidence backing the issue. Examples of which include Nicholas Carr, James Fallows, Eli Pariser, Brian Resnick, and Hannah Holmes in their articles, “How Social Media is Ruining Politics”, “Learning to love the (Shallow, Divisive, Unreliable) New Media”, “Beware of Online Filter Bubbles”, “How Politics Breaks Our Brains and How We Can Put Them Back Together”, and “ Red Brain Blue Brain.” All five of the authors seem to express some concern about
…show more content…
In his article “How Social Media is Ruining Politics”, Nicolas Carr argues that the media of today is more “encompassing and controlling than ever before. (Carr 1)” Media can be manipulated in a way that allows a candidate to have a perceived excellent reputation. However, it can also provide the candidate with a disadvantage by misrepresenting their ideas. As James Fallows, author of “ Learning to love the (Shallow, Divisive, Unreliable) New Media”, points out, “If ideas are misrepresented, it becomes easier to lie. (Fallows 4)” Candidates can easily change the context of their message to make it more appealing on a social media platform. this change causes political issues to become an easily overlooked. He concludes that social media is primarily “used to create a warm emotional connection for a candidate rather than keeping the focus on issues that would help our country.(Carr)” In his article, “Beware of Online Filter Bubbles”, Eli Pariser expresses similar concerns to Carr. He concedes that popular internet mediums like Yahoo and Google “filter search results to fit the needs and intrests of the user. (Pariser)” The websites “filter in what users like and filter out what they dislike. (Pariser)” His concern is that “online media personalization causes important issues to be overlooked easily. (Pariser)” His research provides a…show more content…
Brian Resnick, author of “How Politics Breaks Our Brains, And How We Can Put Them Back Together,” argues that by nature, most Americans have a biased opinion. “The automatically view political issues from a red perspective or a blue perspective. (Resnick 2)” “Political bias is also a result of “filter bubbles. (Pariser)” Resnick claims that “a political bias is inevitable. (Resnick 2)” Although Hannah Holmes, author of “Red Brain Blue Brain” does not say so directly, she and Resnick both made a very similar assumption. She, too believes that Americans have a biased political opinion. After doing a considerable amount of research, she is completely convinced that “political sides are predermined by likes and dislikes. (Holmes)” Holmes firmly believes that America’s political bias is a “result of not obtaining enough information from a variation of networks. (Holmes)” James Fallows, author of “Learning to love the (Shallow, Divisive, Unreliable) New Media” also agrees with this statement. He claims that “instead of being a large audience obtaining information from a variety of trusted sources, America has become a nation of consumers that only obtain information from like-minded networks. (Fallows
Get Access