Social Penetration Essay

Blau states that “social attraction is the force that induces human beings to establish social associations on their own initiative and to expand the scope of their associations once they have been

The contact hypothesis (Allport, 1954) is a technique that is used to produce a more broad-minded society. Work carried out on this field has shown that contact hypothesis has the potential to reduce on prejudice. According to Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) Contact is the solution to prejudice and it works best when it happens in common environment, where other issues have no influence. Two model that been influenced by the contact hypothesis are “the mutual differentiation model” and “the decategorisation model”

The minimal group is a bond of commonality, positive or negative, where relationships, of even an arbitrary or inconsequential nature, within the group can influence attitudes and subsequent behaviors. Membership in such groups often produces the strongest forms of prejudice and discrimination. At a base level college rivalries serve as good examples of how groups can become biased toward the in-group (members) even when such behavior is overt and contrary to an individual’s normal standard for formulating judgments. The reasons for such memberships are primarily related to self-esteem. Our

Social influence is defined when a person's emotions, opinions, or behaviors are affected by others in a group. I noticed this concept in the scene at the beginning when all 12 juries were at the table. The jury was going around the room listening to each other opinion on why the teen was guilty or not. This scene is an example of social influence because one of the juries got up and explain to the rest of the jury how the teen was guilty. He went on explaining how the teen went to juvenile for throwing a rock at his teacher, how he was 14 years old and stole a car, and by explaining how he was arrest twice for trying to knife a kid. The man on the jury was going on and on about how he was a bad kid and the rest of the jury shook their head and agree with him. With his behavior changing and him getting up and sharing his opinion, he affected other people in the

Social interactionism is the perspective that zooms into the individual interactions of people and studies the exchange of symbols through social interactions. One place where social interactions play

A. Social exchange theory is an important process of interaction that occur between people, whether it is from a personal or formal standpoint. This

3. Previous research on has been focused on how interactions with others have influence on a person’s perception of something this was referenced as social exclusions. There was also pervious research on how pain is powerful and there are malicious social exclusions.

One theory of socialisation is constructionism. According to Punch et al. 2013, this illustrates that when babies, for example, are born they are born as a ‘blank canvas’, completely devoid of knowledge. It says that individuals acquire information from the world around them, including their family, peers, school and social media. They are major influences in people’s behaviour and how they make decisions. For example, school teaches us to respect authority figures by obeying teachers and following their commands. According to this view, the idea of the

Have people ever think about them self in the right way and think if they should stick with group of people or being unique. A lot of people say that they should have group to get contact each other, get help if they need for, ask them In state of emergency. However in the over hand some people say that they love and prefer to be without groub just with them self they say its an amizing feeling to feel unique that you are the only one spical and they don’t need to other people. People think in many way some of them like to be in sqwaud and others like to be alone.

As we are studying on social thinking/social cognition along with social influence, we learned that ‘social pain is real pain’. In order to understand the causes of the social pain, we should understand how our social lives sculpt our biology. I see connections in many ways between the concepts discussed in the modules and the ideas, as well as findings presented in the videos. ‘Social connection’ is the mutual point of all social thinking/social cognition material we have been covering in class and the neurobiological and epidemiological evidence discussed by Dr. Lieberman and Dr. Cacioppo.

Social order requires social behaviour to be predictable and individuals to cooperate. Amongst the explanations of social order are five outlined by Hechter and Horne: (shared) ‘meaning’, ‘values and norms’, ‘power and authority’, ‘spontaneous interaction’ and ‘networks and groups’. Following Hechter and Horne, describe how at least TWO of these explanations might account for social order, and discuss the extent to which you find those explanations convincing.

First is the theoretical perspective of symbolic interactionism. It was first introduced by philosopher George Herbert Mead at the University of Chicago. He theorized that all interactions between humans are based on the symbols of appropriate behavior we learn while growing up. This micro level perspective mainly focuses on society as an ongoing and ever-changing process. As humans, we always end up changing and shaping ourselves to fit the acceptable behavior of society. However, cyber-bullying is not an acceptable behavior in society, so why does it still happen? Symbolic interactionism also looks at how certain individuals were raised in society. If an individual had a different upbringing, it can change their outlook on certain issues. However, from a symbolic interactionalism perspective, it’s difficult to place people in groups and

Agents of socialization are "people or groups that affects our self concept, attitudes, behaviors, or other orientations toward life "( p.87). First when looking at our gender we are affected in many ways. Starting off with our families, they show us that pink is for girl and blue is for boy; therefore, parents are buying there daughters dolls while there buying there sons toy guns (p.82). Next we have our peer groups. Our peer groups have impacted us on the way we see and react with things. For example, girls are all about gossip discussing appearances and behavior of other females. While males discuss sex and violence that occur around them (p.84). Then we have our mass media. This affects our gender because of what television, video games, and what advertisement makes us out to be. For example, they used to make girls out to being fragile, but now girls are just as powerful as guys are now in

Integral to the social exchange theory is the possibility that a connection that inspires endorsement from someone else will probably be rehashed than a collaboration that evokes dissatisfaction.

For this paper, I will be examining Peter Hedstrom and Richard Swedberg’s contribution to the literature on Social Mechanisms, and review the more salient