Social Protests

Peaceful resistances to unjust laws both positively and negatively impact a free society. After there has been enough national attention over these protests, large opposition can ensue violence. No matter how careful, meaningful, or powerful the peaceful protestors are there has been a backlash of violence from many different parties. Civil disobedience has been a predominant way minorities have fought for their rights. Women and African Americans have been protesting since the beginning of the United States through civil disobedience.

Since the beginning of american history there have been peaceful and non peaceful protests. These protests have had valuable effects on American society such as Martin Luther King Jr and Rosa Parks have impacted society greatly and for the better. In my opinion peaceful protests still have negative effects though they are immensely more appropriate than non peaceful protests because peaceful protests often turn violent because people don't know how to act for example Trump Protests.

Now I realise it seems a bit hypocritical of me to attack the media’s representation of a news event when I myself am a part of the hype-generating circus we call mass media. However, the voice of my wise, high-school English teacher echoes in my subconscious that we should always be critical of the texts we consume and conscious of the

It is seen multiple times throughout the events in Ferguson, Missouri that the media held onto very biased views on the events. Not just one media source, but majority of the media was taking the side with the public throughout the riots. Some members of the media even marched through the streets of Ferguson protesting what had happened. The media standing with the people of Ferguson was a loud voice, showing that the media was trying to “mete out social justice” (Rothman 22). It was understandable to many why the media was

Civil disobedience has been used by the people to get the attention of their government and to hopefully inspire change. Civil disobedience is an act of refusal by a large group of people against certain laws. From Ghandi to Martin Luther King Jr, people have used civil disobedience to enact change. While the concept of civil disobedience has been around for centuries, it hasn’t been called civil disobedience until recently. Protest, rallies, boycotting and worker strikes are forms of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience has been used for social change too. For example, the suffragettes, Rosa Parks and marches to legalize gay marriage have had social ramifications. Civil disobedience can be used to change laws, it publicizes important changes but it can be overshadowed by violence. Civil disobedience is a good way to change laws because it’s usually peaceful, brings attention to controversial laws and brings about social change.

In the letter from the eight Alabama clergymen, they felt as though those protesting should refrain from nonviolent protesting until the court system decides on their matter. The undersigned clergymen issued an "appeal for law and order and common sense," directing it towards the racial problems in Alabama. The clergymen made it clear that they felt, extreme measures in Birmingham will not be the resolution to the Negro community's problem, despite how peaceful they might be. The letter was meant to sound as considerate as possible, despite attempting to strip the Negro community of their first amendment god-given right. The clergymen feel as though it would be better to have have local leaders act on the matter, instead of gatherings

Since the dawn of human civilization, there have been governments. As a species, we have always attempted to efficiently and systematically maintain order. However it is not uncommon for those same governments to turn on the people it protects, as evidenced by the countless tyrants and authoritarian regimes that plague our history. When studying the complex subject of a free or oppressive government, it is rather interesting to look at the stark contrasts between how both of these organizations handle protests against their rules or laws. The authoritarian regime holds absolute power, meaning that nearly any form of complaint against their actions will be met with disregard, or even punishment. However in a free society in which the government must answer to the people, protests are the language of the discontent, signifying to a representative government that change is needed.

As an essential right of all American citizens, civil disobedience allows American people to strengthen and combine their voices in efforts to change their country. The United States is a country run by the people and for the people. Therefore, it is US citizens that make the United States the strong, independent, flourishing country it is today. It is US citizens that desire change and progress and use civil disobedience to share their ideas and led the countries in many of its advancements in work, racial tensions, and law.

Today’s blog post is regarding David S. Meyer’s “Protest and Communication: New and Old Media” in The Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America. Meyer contextualizes the effects of using the progressing media as a resource to generate mobilization. Through laying out the duality of the components—dissemination, reliability, and proliferation—Meyer establishes the intricate nature of attempting to manage this conduit. Consequently, raising the question of whether the reconstructed modern mass media is an effective and legitimate component to activism.

Protesting unjust ideals and unjust treatments has been a part of world history since the first humans walked the Earth. Many people would say that the majority of these protests have bettered the human race and the future of all people. The text, “Waiting for Dan”, takes place in the Civil Rights Movement, where many people were protesting against segregation. The text, “A Letter Home” takes place after a protest against the Vietnam War leads to bloodshed. Although these protests are taking place for different reasons, they can be seen as similar. Then again, they are also drastically different.

People have the rights to freely protest peacefully, if they feel as though the government is not being just to them can be seen as a form of Social Movement. The problem comes in when the Acting crowds, protest turns into an aggravating riot, causing harm to other people and their property. It not only draws away from what they are fighting for, but it gets more attention, globally especially the negative aspects when media runs with it. I came across an article where the President of the United States, talks about the "criminals and thugs who tore up" the city of Baltimore on Monday night, after rioting and looting paralyzed the city and overwhelmed local officials”. He also mention that the media, play a major part, because they do not react

Frankly, how does one physically approve to oppose a law peacefully? We live in a society where the young still protests using words, and by marching. If we take a look at today's current issue of the newly elected President, Donald Trump, we can see that there is still protesters who don't use physical fight contact. They march until the destination and give speeches. It's like they are aiming for a certain audience or a certain person to listen to their speech and make a change towards that. By examining protests that uses peaceful resistance, non-violence and through communication of literature, it's clear that we continue supporting the protesters who have their statements to be made.

Unfortunately, society is not receiving all of the information, which has resulted in riots and the Black Lives Matter campaign. These riots are aggressive, resulting in the destruction of communities and an overall disregard for societal safety. By analyzing media coverage, this paper will reveal how the

Protests and demonstrations for various incidents and verdicts will continue to be the voice of the public. Unfortunately, they aren’t going anywhere. Usually, it is in response to a particular incident demanding termination, prosecution, letter of resignation, etc. of those involved. Likewise, there could be a reaction to a decision that was made to prosecute or not prosecute. With these demonstrations and protests, law enforcement needs to be trained appropriately to de-escalate or to let them protest if it's nonviolent. As well, you need to ensure that you have an identified person within the department to make sure that the action plan is in place but more importantly they are trained effectively to crowd control methods.

The research for this article was conducted within a framework of Framing theory. The theory was first put forward by a Canadian-American sociologist Erving Goffman. Media framing, to put it bluntly, is a term that points to a presence of a certain bias in any media outlets’ output. All choices made in a newsroom collectively form the frame through which media decides to show the world to the audiences. Everything matters: Covering one event and ignoring another, covering one event more than the other, deciding what words to use to cover an event, what photographs or video clips to include, whom to give a voice, etc. At the same time, framing theory goes far beyond newsroom policies. Framing is not necessarily a delibirate choice. Journalists themselves look at the world through frames: their education, upbringing, gender, ethnical background, knowledge of the issue, and so on. Audience members apply their own frames as well, not just to media content, but to everything they hear and see.