Social Psychology -Inter/Intra Group Dynamics

The Jigsaw cooperative learning model has been shown to be advantageous in creating culturally compatible classrooms be creating positive interactions between the students, Jigsaw incorporates small group work for the different cultures that prefer it. After the small groups, then the class is put in a large group and it benefits the cultures that prefer large cooperation activities. It decreased prejudice and stereotyping the different cultures. Teachers can improve relationships among children from different ethnic groups by incorporating in their lessons similarities the different ethnic groups share. Incorporate movies, novels, plays and other material to teach about the different ethnic groups. Another way is to mix the ethnic groups

Conflict adds a competitive edge as employees within conflict are generally more productive. Even as conflict adds a higher level of tension it creates stronger teams that are more prepared to address conflict. Intergroup conflict is when

Conflict Theory – Macro level – This is built off of resources, status and power that is not evenly distributed throughout groups in our

The conflict perspective highlights the notion that society consists of individuals of different social classes and status groups that are of conflicting self- interests. As

Answer: To check if the prejudice is caused by competition between the in-group and out-group, Sherif has proposed a test. This same test also demonstrated that inter-group conflict could be reduce by the introduction of superordinate goals. An example of the superordinate group is given by Sherif. He has made two groups “then” he called them for competition.

Sherif at al developed an approach to explain intergroup relations as the `realistic group conflict theory` (RCT) (Brown, 2007), and it has a strong empirical support, and SIT also builds upon it. According to this theory, intergroup hostility is based on the competition for tangible resources, as its motivational factors. Sherif also argued that prejudice is a consequence of conflicting or compatible group goals. RCT also has its weaknesses as SIT points out, namely how non-material resources like a persons identity, religion, ethnicity are playing a part in prejudice and intergroup conflicts.

A study that supports this theory was conducted by Sherif et al. (1954). Sherif argues that conflict between groups occurs when two groups are in competition for limited resources. His theory is supported by his study: The Robbers Cave. The experiment involved two groups of 12 year old Protestant boys. The 22 boys were split in to 2 groups, neither was aware of the other’s existence. During the first stage, the boys developed an attachment to their groups and chose the names of their groups; The Eagles and The Rattlers, and drew them on to flags and t-shirts. In the second stage (competition stage), friction was created between the groups and they were put in to competition with one another by a series of activities. Prizes were given to the winners, but there were no consolation prizes for the ‘losers’.

have their own places separate from each other and should only interact when necessary. At

Conflict theory sees societies comprised of groups with conflicting values and interests. (Vold et al. 1998)

There will always be conflicts in our daily lives. However, in our readings, conflict does not have to be negative; apparently, it depends on the circumstances, conflicts can be absolute. According to our text, the conflict has a way to convert energy to positive social learning. "Without conflict, attitudes, behavior, and relationships will always stay the same, regardless of whether they are fair" (Tubbs, 2012, p. 325). Positive conflicts can help to eliminate the issue or the cause of the problem. According to our text about "groupthink," which represents a form of social influence of the majority that results in a dangerous level of agreement by

Disparities are unavoidable in some group sessions, there will always be individuals with diverse encounters, states of mind and desires. On the other hand, a few conflicts can reinforce authoritative objectives. Surely, if there is not a little conflict in groups, the group would probably be unresponsiveness, absence of imagination, uncertainty would develop. Conflicts of thoughts regarding would help with tasks and good achievement in goals. Sometimes conflict can be good for the group in general as long as it is functional conflicts.

A leader has a role that can impact others to be more operative in functioning to attain a common goal and maintain effective working relationships amongst group members (Johnson & Johnson 2012). This makes leaders in groups considerably important in shaping individuals (Johnson & Johnson 2012). However, conflict arises in groups and becomes difficult to manage when a leader and the followers lack the skills to manage conflict as a team (Johnson & Johnson 2012). Leadership and conflict resolution skills must exists between leaders and followers in order to manage conflict (Johnson & Johnson 2012). Also, it is possible for followers to teach leaders how to lead and resolve problems since followers can play an active role in building relationships amongst group members (Howell & Shamir cited in Johnson & Johnson 2012). Since followers and leaders both have significant roles in accomplishing the group goals, they both have a role to manage conflict effectively as a group (Johnson & Johnson 2012). This essay will discuss how leaders have an important role in managing conflict and likewise with followers having important roles in managing conflict. Conflicts, the various types of conflicts that happen in groups and the reasons behind the conflicts will be mentioned followed by approaches that can be taken to help manage struggles within groups. The methods can be used by leaders and followers in order to manage

My interviewee was confronted with a Group-to-group conflict: The term "group" suggests oneness or sameness. In this type of conflict, each group (rather than the individual) has taken an opposition position that leads to discord or disharmony. A group 's identity and goals are usually in conflict with those of the other group (Module 2: Module 2 - Conflict Resolution; Control Approaches, 2015).

As stated above, my group was comprised of people from different ethnic backgrounds, each with his/her own ideologies and perspectives. The challenge here was limited communication due to language barriers. English is used as the main language for communicating across almost all forums, including classrooms. Regardless of this, it became more difficult for us to communicate effectively simply because some of the members had a hard time deciphering what we were conversing about. It could have been that some of the requirements for presentation were confusing or some of the English phrases and terminologies were not conversant with them. However, we devised a mechanism where we integrated the

Intergroup conflict is when members of a group have hostility towards one another. This can be seen in the cases of juvenile delinquents within a detention center who are also members of active gangs. They all have one thing in common – they are part of a group (the detention center) and are part of smaller groups (their individual gangs). These differences cause the intergroup conflicts.