preview

Social Realism In John Steinbeck's The Grapes Of Wrath

Good Essays
Open Document

John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath was a controversial, yet intriguing novel at the time it was written. It gave the reader a new perspective on life by shedding light upon the often unspoken hardships of workers and the less fortunate. The Grapes of Wrath is a novel written by John Steinbeck in the time of the Great Depression. The plot revolves around social realism as it follows the Joad family’s journey westward in search of opportunities. Social realism, as defined by the Oxford dictionary, is the realistic depiction in art or literature of contemporary life, as a means of social or political comment. Although not explicitly stating it, The Grapes of Wrath has many indications of social realism within the book, including the intercalary …show more content…

The families travelling westward speak in a dialect that indicates to the reader that they may be less educated and of a lower economic class, just judging by the way they speak in the novel. For example, when Muley Graves speaks to Tom about the disappearance of his family, he says to him, “What I’m tellin’ you. … Took the stove an’ the pump an’ the beds. You should a seen them beds go out with all them kids an’ your granma an’ granpa settin’ up against the headboard, an’ your brother Noah settin’ there smokin’ a cigaret, an’ spittin’ la-de-da over the side of the wagon.” (Steinbeck 59) By replicating the language that families would have likely used during this time and not just using a common, more educated dialect, Steinbeck shows much more about the characters and creates a more realistic atmosphere. Compared to the dialect of those looking for work in California, the people running the farms and advertising work have a much different way of speaking. Take, for example, a man who advertises a farming operation that the Joads are interested in working for, who says to Tom, “Well, you go north to pixely, that's thirty-five or -six miles,and then you turn east. Go about six miles. Ask anybody where the Hooper ranch id. You'll find plenty of work there.” (468) The reader can tell from this man’s speech alone the difference in education and likely a …show more content…

Steinbeck, however, likes to keep each character in the grey area between pure good and evil, no matter if he is describing a tenant worker, someone who works for the bank, or a group of men with malicious intent towards the families of the government camps. A prime example is the major character Jim Casy, specifically how he tells Tom that he is "Just Jim Casy now. Ain't got the call no more. Got a lot of sinful idears – but they seem kinda sensible." (28) Here, Casy is describing to Tom why he decided to stop being a preacher, even though he still believes in his religion. He has sinful thoughts and has committed various sins whilst being a preacher, but still has righteous morals and religious ideas. This is just one example of the complex way that Steinbeck creates each character, always showing both the good and bad in every person. One more example of how Steinbeck shows both the good and bad in his characters is within the character Willy Feeley. Willy Feeley was a former family friend of the Joads, however he took a job as a tractor driver and was the one who knocked down the Joad residence. When questioned about this, Muley Graves says to Casy and Tom, “... he jus’ come on, and’ bumped the hell outa the house, and’ give her a shake like a dog shakes a rat.” (59) Muley later goes on to describe how Willy only knocked down the house to earn money to feed himself and his family,

Get Access