Social Science Studies : Ethical Issues Which Can Occur When Conducting Research Online

Even though codes of ethics are written down, they are not known as rules, but it is given to set the boundaries of what is and is not an acceptable way to conduct research

To ensure that a researcher’s enthusiasm for knowledge and understanding doesn’t let them get carried away, clear guidelines for ethical behaviour in research, a Code of Ethics, have been established by governments, institutions and various professional societies such as the American Psychological Association(APA), the British Psychological Society (BPS) and the Psychological Society of Ireland (PSI).

Protecting individuals from harm ensures that researchers think the possible effects of their research on the candidates. For example, candidates rights and feelings should be well thought-out when planning the project and collecting the data from the individuals. Research should not cause harm or offence, but this should be considered in the context of the

P2 Understand ethical issues relating to research in health and social care Ethical principles Protection from harm- In any health care setting it is always important to make sure that all the individuals in all the aspects of the area are being protected from harm. In any organization the most important policy is the protection policy this enables the staff to make sure that all the individuals feel safe. Protection from harm does not only mean being protected from abuse It could be protecting people's health and wellbeing and enabling them to live free from harm, neglect and abuse.

There are no unique ethical issues with this particular research study; therefore, there will be no need

A number of key terms describe the system of ethical considerations that the modern research establishments have set up to protect the rights of research subjects. Voluntary participation and confidentiality are principles that demands that the respondents to be free from coercion in any way when participating in the research, protected in the raw data, and published

There are three basic ethical principles that researchers should adhere while conducting research. The three

Assessing ethical concerns is of key importance in planning, performing, and evaluating research, and includes four key issue areas of protection from harm, informed consent, right to privacy, and professional code of APA ethics (Cozby & Bates, 2012) These four areas of ethical issues must be considered whenever research involves human participants. Another important area for the researcher to review relative to ethical issues in human research is the importance of gaining an understanding of the internal review board (IRB). The purpose of this paper is to examine ethical concerns, and provide a brief review of the IRB, including when completion of an IRB application is required.

The importance of ethics in social psychology is to ensure that participants are treated fairly throughout the entire research process. The way to ensure fairness is to give participants knowledge and exactly what to expect during the study. Researchers are responsible for preventing participants from harm according to the APA Code of Ethics. The best way to protect participants during a study is to keep participants’ information and responses anonymous and confidential. Researchers must also avoid distress for participants during the study and after also as a means of protecting the client from harm.

Ethics describe a set of rules, codes, and guidelines that individuals and professionals live by to separate right from wrong and acceptable behavior from undesirable behavior. As such, the study of ethics is not grounded on the law but rather a perception of what people ought to do in the alignment of fairness, rights, obligations, and benefits to the society. Researchers in the field of psychology must follow specific rules, codes, and guidelines in every study. However, like many sets of rules provided, ethical codes may not cover every situation hence the necessity of analyzing past, current and future aspects of ethics in research pertaining to social sciences.

Those who pursue social science research (documentary work) walk quite a fine ethical line. Works of all types- from film to research studies to photography and videography including daily news stories- are open to criticism for the versions of reality they produce for their audiences. Indeed, there exist academic and professional guidelines explicitly itemizing set standards of practice for various mediums, for example- broadcast news stories, magazine articles and documentary films. And although they may have been meticulously outlined, these standards simply cannot account for all who make up the intended viewer or readership. Described as the study of human interaction and how it functions in society, social science research possesses an ethical dilemma that exists in large part because of an unavoidable subjective nature that can never be fully separated from the undertaking. American author and child psychiatrist, Robert Coles, contends this notion in his book

British Sociological Association (2002) ‘Statement of Ethical Practice for The British Sociological Association’. Available at: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx. [31.10.13].

The American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics addresses most of the issues that Babbie raises. For instance, on confidentiality the sociologists are encouraged to ensure that the information they have is protected so as to uphold the integrity of a specific research as well as ensuring there is open communication with the research participants. Sociologists are encouraged to take reasonable precautions even when there is no legal privilege or protection to do so. Voluntary participation is covered on the Informed Consent ethical conduct where a subject in a research involving human populations must be well aware of what the researcher is doing and the information provided is voluntary and not coerced.

Why A Public Anthropology? addresses the issue about why cultural anthropology is not affective by its current stance of “not doing any ethical harm” and into more detail explains why IRB’s should make notions to move towards a more positive stance of "doing good." Throughout the explanation of ethical violations from five given cases, the details will prove why these violations emphasize that the review board’s current stance of "do no harm is an ethically ambiguous position”. Even with anthropologists going in with the intentions of not doing harm result in the exact opposite; including national governments who try to avoid ethical issues end up just over-regulating research studies. These actions limit researcher ability to do well and cause additional problems. IRB’s focus on positive results is based on monetary value and time however this does not show respect and sensitivity. In the reading of this research I conclude it is due to the lack of similarity to the participants of the study leads to lack of care and treatment, thus threatening their wellbeing leads to the ethical issues in research cases and regulation. To solve this problem, Institutional Review Boards and Review Ethics Boards should create a set of common rules, these rules could easily differentiate what between what is what is and what is not ethical behavior and additionally it would facilitate all types of data in research projects that

The Belmont Report was put in place to protect individuals who are involved in biomedical and behavioral research. The Belmont Report assist individuals to understand ethical codes and strategies essential for conducting research where human are involved. Three main ethical principles for research according to The Belmont Report include respect for persons, benificence, and justice. The Belmont Report keeps individuals in line when an issue arises. Sometimes people are faced with adversity and need to come to a decision that would not hurt or harm all parties involved. The individuals conducting the research are welcome to use these ethical codes and strategies to develop a conclusion that best suit all parties involve. In this paper