A crime is an unlawful act that you can be convicted for by a state or other authority. Crime is something that inevitably happen. There are some things that are linked to a decrease in crime rate. Two of the most common or talked about factors in crime is education and family. Studies have been conducted over the years that link education to a decrease in crime. Differential association and social strain theory were applied to show how certain conditions can encourage deviance and crime
Keywords: crime, inmate, education, family, social strain theory, differential association
Introduction Crime rates are growing in America. According to the latest Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) crime statistics, the estimated number of violent crimes in the U.S. increased for the second straight year (FBI Releases 2016 Crime Statistics, 2017). According to the FBI, the violent crime rate rose 4.1 percent in 2016 when compared to 2015’s statistics (FBI Releases 2016 Crime Statistics, 2017). Many people believe that the key to eliminating a portion of the crime rate starts with education. News anchors, politicians, and people you encounter in your everyday life talk about crime and the reason for it.
…show more content…
According to an article on The Huffington Post, a study from Washington University in St. Louis was conducted, and it was discovered that the total cost of incarceration in the United States exceeds $1 trillion (Ferner 2016). In this paper I intend on showing the reason for crime and the link between crime, family, and education. Your family is the first group of people you learn from. Your education and those you meet in school are the second things you learn from. From these two things you get a set of values instilled in you. With a good foundation, your chances of partaking in criminal activity should be lower than those without a good
Strain theories of criminal behaviour have been amongst the most important and influential in the field of criminology. Taking a societal approach, strain theories have sought to explain deficiencies in social structure that lead individuals to commit crime (Williams and McShane 2010). Strain theories operate under the premise that there is a societal consensus of values, beliefs, and goals with legitimate methods for achieving success. When individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. This is the basic premise of strain theory. This
Social Strain Theory and criminal offending are seen by most theorist as a way of understanding what could be the causes of youth committing crimes. Theorist are very concern if social strain theory really does have the answer to why this is happening, but they also believe that the result may be inconclusive, because of all the different variables and independent variables that could be used in their research. We will take a look at this theory, and see if they and ask our participants from the state of Georgia inner-city neighborhoods a few question that they will supply their own answer to, and then ask them an open-ending question face to face and ask them to choose the answer that best state why they might commit a crime or not. If we are able to understand the results then we hope we can implement it into policy. And by incorporating it into policy, then we might be able to design a strategy that will help LEOs or other agencies to reduce youth offending, deter criminal acts and future crimes. Lastly, so with the implementation of social strain theory into the policy and the evaluation of the data, discussion and the questions we can create a foundation for further research studies to build on our results.
Criminology data show a strong correlation between undereducated children and juvenile crime. Children who struggle academically in school, have poor attendance, are expelled, or drop out, likelihood to commit crime increases. The social skills such as learning how to have ownership through deadlines, following instructions, and overall dealing with people constructively, are thrown out the door when a student doesn’t finish school. A child who doesn’t end up having a proper education soon realizes he or she can’t get certain jobs due to their insufficient education and feels hopelessness. According to social strain theory, his or her feeling towards social differences are magnified and pushes him or her to attain the “American Dream” or financial security through
Deviance is explained by this theory because criminal behavior is more prominent in rundown areas with citizens who have lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Two sub-theories such as differential association theory and strain theory explain more in depth why people join violent gangs or are subjected to be dangerous consumers. Differential association theory puts a focus on the idea that people learn criminal behavior from the people they associate with. For example, the gang members who shot the woman’s son learn to do that from the previous gang members of whom they associated with. Strain theory is when an individual undertakes deviant acts because there is a discrepancy between the larger society and the means available for that individual to achieve a goal in the larger society. An example is the people in New Orleans that the cops arrested who had drugs and were trying to sell them to innovate a quicker way to make
During the 19th century, poverty was widely seen as one of the main drivers of crime(Burney, 161). Many families that were starving were driven to theft. For some lower class families, crime was an easy way out, but for others it was a necessity. Furthermore, education affected crime in various numbers of ways. One direct effect of education is that it reduced the amount of time for criminal activities to those enrolled in school(Wong, 239). The older offenders committing crimes were too late to benefit from the spread of educational opportunities and they were more likely to commit crimes. Overtime, education resulted in a significant decline in juvenile offenders(Wong, 239). The unemployment rate had a significant effect on the crime rate as well. Many people found themselves without jobs and homes. Unemployment implied that the increasing risk of finding a good job encouraged crime.
The theoretical framework of strain theory can be credited to sociologist Emile Durkheim. Durkheim research on formed a platform for other sociologist to further develop strain theories of crime. One of which is Robert Merton. One of Durkheim’s major works that opened the door to further research on strain theories was his book, Suicide. In this book Durkheim sough to understand the why led to one’s own self-destruction. Emile Durkheim studied suicide rates and its association with crisis. Durkheim noticed trends in suicide rates that were associated with economic prosperity and economic crisis.
The social construct of crime - the process constructing crime was subjected to the constraints of a legitimate nature which allowed by law for the fairness between both the powerful and their less powerful counterparts. This was done with specific mechanisms to control the behaviour of the powerful, this process made laws such as environmental laws possible.
Sutherland, both a sociologist and professor, developed Differential Association theory in 1939. Sutherland made a realization that crime happens in all social standings, not just the lower class. According to Sutherland, criminal activity is not inherent but learned. For example, children are not born to be racist but learn racism either through a family member or a close group of friends or acquaintances. Although Differential Association theory is a learned behavior, one needs to mentor someone on how to engage in deviant behavior and also how to have the right motivation and attitude to commit illegal corruption. What is the person undertaking the activity going to get out of the deviant behavior money, approval from friends or a better job? Criminals know that committing a crime is wrong, but they somehow have to rationalize to themselves that its alright because of the guilt they feel. Differential Association theory also states that people committing these crimes are doing it because it's more promising to violate the law than not too. Likewise, just because people commit deviant acts doesn’t mean they will continue to engage in those acts later in life according to
“A Rose for Emily” is a piece about a southern, aristocrat woman who becomes increasingly less stable as she ages. Emily lives a more secluded and a more interesting life than the other people in her town. The narrator of the piece plays a large role in the meaning of the story and contributes to the overall whole of the story in various ways. We get to see Emily’s life from not only the narrator’s personal point of view but also from the viewpoint of the entire town. The way that the narrator structures the piece contributes to the overall meaning as well.
Crime is a social construct because it is an idea that is established by a society to control the behaviors of the people within the society (“Radical Concept of Crime”). What is considered to be criminal varies within different area and cultures and even time. Things that were legal two hundred years ago are illegal now. For example, in the 18th and 19th century when slavery was allowed in America, there were a lot of people who saw nothing wrong with it because they had been socialized to accept and justify it. If you ask most Americans now about slavery, they would say that it was a tragedy or that they just cannot understand how it happened. This is because we are now being socialized to think of slavery as wrong. Even though many citizens
As human beings we all see and hear about crimes from a day to day basis. We all question why we have crime and what makes a person commit a crime.
Amanda Berg Mrs. Quinn English 9(4) 12/4/17 Focus Correction Areas (FCAs) Introduction that provides an interesting hook or important background information to your topic/idea (don’t forget title and author) –10 points Thesis statement/overall claim that presents the main point that you will argue in a statement that includes a topic, position and reason(s) for that position —15 points At least 3 body paragraphs, each of which includes: a claim that states a reason in support of your thesis statement in the first sentence at least one specific example from the play that supports that reason explanation and analysis of each example — 30 points A quote to support each example, for a total of 3 quotes in your
Criminology is an interdisciplinary science that gathers and analyzes data on crime and criminal behavior. As I learned about criminology I learned that there are several theories that come along with it. The two theories in criminology that stood out the most to me were social strain theory and rational choice theory. These theories stood out to me because I felt like these were two that I can truly see how the people who developed them came about. Social strain theory was created by Robert Merton in the 1940s. Robert Merton is a very famous sociologist who accomplished a lot throughout his career. He spent a lot of his time studying at Colombia University. He also was the first sociologist that received a National Medal of Science Award. Merton came up with the strain theory as an explanation as to why crime rate was so high. Rational choice theory was created by Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish. Ronald Clarke was a professor who severed as a dean at the School of Criminal Justice. He was there was longer than a decade. Clarke also had a very successful career. An important and most noted part of his career is him being given the highest award in criminology. The highest awards was the Stockholm Prize in Criminology. Clarke has also written several books and help developed several things in Britain’s government. Cornish worked in the department of social science at London School of Economics. Rational choice theory was created to explain why and how every human who commits a crime is faced with a choice.
My most treasured item is a box with a hole in it and a few extra dials, symbols, and buttons attached. The common misconception with photography is that more expensive your gear the higher quality your photographs and that’s what I believed too. However,that mindset quickly shifted after taking film IBSL; I was introduced to Adobe programs, color grading, and most importantly a visual education. Photographs told stories by looking at the world through the lens, not by the scale of the aperture managed by a dial. Soon, I focused less on those extra technical features and honed into to my “eye”. What first started out as a hobby became my newfound artistic form that provided a creative outlet for what stories I wanted to share. Photography began
In the United States, juvenile delinquency is becoming a major problem in the communities across the country. Because of the actions that these juveniles engage in on a regular basis, taxpayers across the country are having to shell out hundreds upon thousands of dollars to rehabilitate these children in order to help them make better choices. This leads citizens to wonder what factors actually cause juveniles to live a life of crime rather than success. In short, there are three main factors that often cause children to live a life of crime. These three factors are social influences, psychological characteristics, and academic potential.