Social Welfare System in Hong Kong

The social welfare in the UK is very different in practice for example benefits and services are delivered at minimum level as the coverage it widespread and can be too costly or even extensive. The social protection in which the welfare state provided is irregular and unpredictable and the services are rationed very tightly. As the services have been contracted out to self-reliant providers the control over the quality and reliability of social protection had been even more difficult to maintain. (Spicker2014)

Social insurance programs were designed to provide continuing income to citizens over 65 after retirement, health benefits and provide benefits for the unemployed, survivors and disabled. Social insurance programs are non-means tested, work based and incorporate a large number of people while public assistance

The Welfare State has its own benefits and drawbacks. Even though social welfare has its own issues and weaknesses, it can be considered as one of the most important things in our

Lastly, the Social Security Act was one of many reform efforts that sprung from the New Deal. This act was an attempt to provide general welfare for women and their children, those with disabilities such as blindness, older individuals, and public health, and helped financially support them while they were looking for work elsewhere. It was most common with elderly individuals, as they received what is known as “old-age pensions.” This was one of the few reforms that has stayed with us since the New Deal, and was economically successful in bringing America out of the Great

Changes within the welfare system as a result of policy shifts and by new thinking, more generally in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), have had many methods, but the one that seemed most important, was that welfare recipients were required to do much more to justify their income support payments than before. The foundation of this new idea is that income support programs should allow individuals to maximise their participation in work. Due to the general shift in welfare administration, the number of activity test requirements an individual in Australia must meet in order to receive unemployment benefits, has expanded significantly since the early 1990s. This complex, overly bureaucratic process means that disadvantaged individuals cannot access the income support payments they require.

One of the most important things in our lives today is Canada’s welfare state, as it transformed Canada’s economy after the economy’s downturn from the Great Depression. The democratic system was formed to maintain prosperity, solidity and security in our everyday lives. One of the key pillars of the nation’s welfare state is employment insurance (EI). Through this analysis of Canada’s employment insurance, I will elucidate why I believe that this program should continue, but with refinements, as it has benefited a large portion of unemployed Canadians over the years and should continue doing so to fulfill the countries goals of the welfare state.

Upon further examination of the Health Care Safety Net Increased Eligibility Amendment Act of 2005, the following latent goals were established. The act’s first latent function is to decrease discrimination amongst services rendered to individuals based on health status, gender or income. Also, the act serves to sustain a healthy American population by encouraging people to seek medical/health care by creating and providing access to these services. Finally, the last latent goal of the Health Care Safety Net Increased Eligibility Amendment Act of 2005 serves as a benefit to the federal government’s health care system spending as the act serves to improve the health of society. Therefore, the act

The Social Security Act was created as a way to help keep families together. It helped disabled individuals against the expense of their illness. As well as it gave children and families a chance to live a healthy and secure life. The first two programs were the most essential at this time. The first program Title I, was a grant for old-age assistance. The second program that developed was Title II, which was a federal assistance for old-age, survivors and individuals with disabilities that included insurance benefits. The act includes a large list of programs that one might qualify for such as, retirement insurance, disability insurance, medical insurance for elderly, veterans benefits, unemployment insurance and much more. According

What would happen if the government made changes to the welfare system? There are approximately 110,489,000 of Americans on welfare. Many people benefit from what the system has to offer: food stamps, housing, health insurance, day care, and unemployment. Taxpayers often argue that the individuals who benefit from the system, abuse the system; however, this is not entirely true. Many of the people who receive benefits really and truly need the help. Even though some people believe welfare should be reformed, welfare should not be reformed because 40% of single mothers are poor, some elderly people do not have a support system, and college students can not afford to take extra loans.

The second most useful part of the SSA would be the Disability Benefits given out by the SSA.

It originally included several other programs, which have been incorporated into the others over time. The Social Security Act was meant to help Americans who had been hurt by the Great Depression get back on their feet during hard economic times. Even critics of the Act never imagined how far-reaching its programs would become. Critics did, however, say that the entire Act was a breeding ground for waste, fraud, and misuse. Roosevelt answered them by saying, "Better the occasional faults of a government that lives in the spirit of charity, then the constant omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference." Indeed, the Social Security Act was originally created in the spirit of charity. For quite some time, AFDC accomplished its mission-- to allow single mothers who had been widowed or deserted by their husbands to stay at home and raise their children. However, much has changed since 1935. No longer are single mothers pitied for their predicament. Instead they are blamed for getting pregnant too soon and for having babies that they knew they could not afford. No longer are women expected to stay home with their children. Instead they are urged to go to work in order to provide for their children and become better role models. Those women who claim that it is too hard to work and raise children are often scorned by the many single professional

Several states have recently begun to enact legislation that requires welfare recipients to submit to drug tests before they are eligible to receive any public assistance. The purpose of mandatory drug testing is to prevent the potential abuse of taxpayer money, help individuals with drug problems, and ensure that public money is not subsidizing drug habits (Wincup, 2014). While these are noble intentions, current programs are not meeting these standards.

There is significant need for a more simplified system for payment of benefits that also improves incentives to work. Customers that have previously been left to claim benefit with little or no intervention will have better access to face-to-face or telephone support. Jobcentre advisors will be given more freedom to assess customer’s needs and use their discretion in providing a personalised service.

In today’s modern society, the United States faces many public policy issues, whether those issues include social welfare, immigration or even environmental issues. Congress receives numerous issues on public polices every day, but they cannot handle and solve every issues that comes across their daily agenda, nor can they satisfy every person in this country. Congress prioritizes on those issues that are more important and relevant to find a probable solution too. A growing issue we see that in today’s society are issues in the social welfare system. Social Welfare has so many issues within some of those issues include the food stamps, and even in the healthcare system. The matters in social welfare requires every individuals help to resolve, not just congress. The second major public policy issue we face in American today are within the Public Assistance Programs. Those programs include the SNAP, SSI, and even the TANF program.

What comes to your mind when you hear the words ‘Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA) Scheme recipients’? Do you treat them equally? Do you commiserate with them? Do you think that they are lazy, jobless and reliant? Most people argued that there is alleged abuse of CSSA. They pointed out that the recipients are lazy, and are dependent on social welfare. This phenomenon can be explained by the labeling theory. I am going to apply the labeling perspective to the alleged abuse of CSSA, and illustrate the causes and consequences.