Social justice historic Marxist classical writers believe that social justice is a historical

The Granges ultimate goal was to help farmers “gain economic leverage and strengthen the commercial position of the American farmer” (Globalyceum, The Gilded Age and the Progressive Era, 1877-1914). The Labor Unions and the Grange set up social justice for the workers during the Gilded Age. They both built social solidarity and collaborative action, as well as empowered the workers to exercise self-determination, realize their full potential, and fight for what they deserved as workers.

Most local governments had a laissez faire approach to prostitution and that motivated several social justice reformers to band together during the Progressive Era. Iowa became the first state to pass injunction and abatement laws in 1909. Again, state prostitution laws didn’t exist up until that point in history! Although, every state eventually followed suit by passing those same laws, which allowed police to shut down brothels as “public nuisances” as long as there were complaints from concerned citizens and the judge agreed with their opinion. Consequently, many cities began shutting down their red-light districts, but some notable cities such San Francisco, New Orleans, and San Antonio didn’t enforce the new laws.

John Rawls states that the principle of fairness is important as it applies to individuals the principle of fairness are a link between the two principles of social or political justice and individual obligations to comply with specific social practices (Pogge, 2007). By expanding the scope of what one considers to be an ‘end’ to include both aspects of nature as well as future generations, one can transform the implications of Rawls’ theory (Pogge, 2007). Rawls advances his theory of justice through what is called the Original Position which is a hypothetical situation in which all individuals are granted perfect equality and are asked to choose a principle of justice behind a veil of ignorance, which eliminates their biases (Pogge, 2007). The hypothetical persons in the Original Position, ignorant of who and what they will be in society and perfectly equal to one another, are able to truly come to a consensus as to what a just society would be (Pogge, 2007). Justice

The concept egalitarianism can be a little difficult to understand at first, because there are many different ways to define this concept. The basic idea around egalitarianism is “people should get the same, or be treated the same, or be treated as equals, in some respect” (Encyclopedia of Philosophy). There are different ways to define equal

Emphasis is heavily placed on the concepts social justice and economic justice as well as they seem to be very complex. The concepts are typically used together to describe equal opportunities socially and economically (Briana, 2016), however in reality we face social and economic injustice. When the concepts social and economic justice

"Social justice is what faces you in the morning. It is awakening in a house with adequate water supply, cooking facilities and sanitation. It is the ability to nourish your children and send them to school where their education not only equips them for employment but reinforces their knowledge and understanding of their cultural inheritance. It is the prospect of genuine employment and good health: a life of choices and opportunity, free from discrimination" (Dodson, 1993).

Egalitarianism is a philosophy that supports the idea of equality for all people regardless of race, religion, age or gender (Fox, 2013; The Australian Collaboration, na). It is a principle which can be broken down in sub categories such as ‘economic egalitarianism’ or ‘opportunity egalitarianism’. These subcategories examine parts of society which, if equality in each was achieved, would create a situation in which the pure form of the philosophy would exist (Joseph, 2014). However, the extreme outcome of this philosophy has already shown that it has the potential of not fulfilling its ideals, as demonstrated by communism in Russia (Joseph, 2014; Fox, 2013).

The conversation about economic inequality is not one that only exists in today’s contemporary society but rather one that continued through time, evolving with the changes in different societies. From before the existence of agrarian societies through the industrial revolution and even up till today, the topic of economic inequality is one whose moral implications to the equality of all individuals has been and always will be questioned. Today, it is one of the most debated issues in the United States. Regardless of the terminology used to discuss it—economic inequality, income gap, or wealth disparities—it is heatedly conferred and everyone has an opinion on it. Is it right or wrong? Should it exist? Is it justified? Does it corrupt our

Social Justice Equally Distributed? Social justice is defined as’’... promoting a just society by challenging injustice and valuing diversity.’ It exists when all people share a common humanity so therefore they have the right to equitable treatment, support for their human rights, and a fair allocation of community resources. Martin Luther King Jr. once stated “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

There were also many socialist’s thinkers in history who had tried to make claims about the economic inequality in the country they

Marx's ideas on labor value are very much alive for many organizations working for social change. In addition, it is apparent that the gap between the rich and poor is widening on a consistent basis. According to Marx, the course of human history takes a very specific form which is class struggle. The engine of change in history is class opposition. Historical epochs are defined by the relationship between different classes at different points in time. It is this model that Marx fleshes out in his account of feudalism's passing in favor of bourgeois capitalism and his prognostication of bourgeois capitalism's passing in favor of proletarian rule. These changes are not the reliant results of random social, economic, and political events; each follows the other in predictable succession. Marx responds to a lot of criticism from an imagined bourgeois interlocutor. He considers the charge that by wishing to abolish private property, the communist is destroying the "ground work of all personal freedom, activity, and independence". Marx responds by saying that wage labor does not properly create any property for the laborer. It only creates capital, a property which works only to augment the exploitation of the worker. This property, this capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property to class hostility, Marx

Social justice is the distribution of difference in society and is based on equality and its opportunity.

Ever since the creation of man, society has been trying to achieve harmony between its citizens and establish a utopia in which everyone can live in peace and harmony. During the 1800s many citizens of capitalist countries believed that they were living in this utopia, however the working class begged to differ. It was not until the mid-1800s that someone finally stood up for these proletarians as this man believed that the exploitation of members of the working class was unfair. This person was called Karl Marx. This German philosopher inspired workers to rise up and challenge injustices and exploitations. In addition, his views on life and the social structure of his time revolutionized the way people think. It was not until Karl Marx

Having read the unique social ideals of both John Rawls and Karl Marx I intend to explain both philosophers points of view on the justices of society and historical class rankings. I would like to share their similarities and differences as each made valid points on history. Next, I intend to share the reasoning behind my findings and that of the philosopher 's ideas. Finally, I will share my appreciation for Karl Marx, as he has influenced my views thus far.

Social sciences and social justice are both based on the structure of rights. Our rights were designed to create equality for all. However, there are always outliers in our justice system and these outliers can be seen by all. My background and demographic are aggressively average growing up in a small, rural community with little diversity which has affected my views about justice. The class Social Problems and Social Injustice has aggressively opened my eyes to new statistics about society and has made some of my intuitions validated and destroyed some of my prior views. My new understanding of social justice is that is was created for all by excluding some. Justice is the structure of our institutions and society.