B. To Nielsen Capitalism needs private productive property to work while socialism works to abolish private ownership of production. Socialism is more free in the sense that is requires public ownership and control of the means of production. Under capitalism there is private property rights. Under this people who own the property get to choose what is done to the property but in socialism citizens at large get to chose what happens to the property. (Social Ethics) In socialism there is no domain that is not subject to political determination. Socialism is not a state of ownership though. (Social Ethics) At the very least its popular sovereignty. The property that is owned by the government is productive property not private personal property. …show more content…
(Social Ethics) But Socialism is more free of the sense that every able bodied worker is a worker. Capitalism has classes while Socialism is a classless society and no separation in classes. In Socialism workers will have firm control over the means of production and as well democracy. (Social Ethics)Capitalists societies according to Nielsen are further down the corporate road then many other societies. To Nielsen, Socialism would be a great society that would flourish of autonomy . Socialism interferes less in peoples exercise of autonomy then capitalism. Capitalists put a limitation on human freedoms and their being able to live in a self directed manner. If in charge Socialism would prohibit the capitalists from buying and selling and to control the labor market. (Social Ethics) In this society workers would determine how they work, on what they are to work, the hours they work and what conditions they are to work and what they will produce and how much and what will be done with it after. (Social Ethics)With Public ownership means that everyone will have the right to work and no longer the private rights of corporations. Socialism will produce more equality than …show more content…
To Young oppression has many forms these are exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and systematic violence. (Social Ethics)These forms are not all oppressed to the same extent or way but suffer in a way to develop and exercise their capacities and their needs. Exploitation is the first type of oppression. (Social Ethics)Young says that a capitalist society removes traditional law enforced class distinctions and promotes the belief in the legal freedom of persons. (Social Ethics)Workers then contract with whatever employer they choose and then receive a wage from them. Young then raises the question then “ why do class distinctions persist between the wealthy ?” (Social Ethics) Every Product’s value is a function of the labor time needed for its production. The labor power is the one product that in the process of being consumed produces value. (Social Ethics) Profit, the foundation of capitalist power and wealth, comes from the difference between the value of the labor performed and the value of the capacity to labor which the capitalist purchases. (Social Ethics) Profit is only possible because of the owner of the capital gives it surplus value showing that the workers are exploited. (Social Ethics)Through private ownership of the means of production and by markets that designate labor and the ability to buy products, Capitalism transfers powers to one person to others . Then in this process of transferred powers the capitalist class
The ideal of capitalism believes in the ideal of Laissez-faire and opposes government intervention in economics because capitalists believe free-market produces the best economic outcome for society and the government should not pick winners and losers. Even though capitalism disregards the theory that government can change rules of conduct/business practices through regulation or ease of regulations; socialism is still the better form of government because its’ ideals are that people are to have equal opportunity to
4.Capitalism - economic system where private individuals/corporations control the means of production and use them to make profits. Socialism is a system in which the government controls the economy and there is equal distribution of wealth.
In her writing, Young references prominent groups of 1960’s social movements as examples to her claim which is that oppression is caused by: exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence. In this essay I will be focusing on just three (exploitation, marginalization and powerlessness) of these five because the three share a relationship in terms of labor and power.
As mentions before socialism is the doctrine that espouses public ownership or control of a major means of production. It aims to achieve an equitable and efficient distribution of social goods and greater economic planning then exist under capitalism. Although the central concerns of socialism appears to be economic its ramifications extend to the moral, social and political realms, in fact together with nationalism, it is the leading ideological and political movement of the 20th century.
“Five Faces of Oppression” by Iris M. Young tries to create an idea that we can critique the reality and stages of oppression of different groups. She argues that oppression is structural in the sense that injustices arise from systematic everyday activities, and not from policies or how people act. Since oppression is systematically reproduced and thus ingrained into culture, politics and economics, therefore it cannot be simply removed from our society. She separates the condition of oppression into five different forms: exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence. Young states that exploitation is where oppression occurs in the transfer of one social group’s products of labor to benefit the wealthier class. She also argues that women are also exploited to through this from of
Capitalism refers to an economic system whereby ownership of as well as investment in the means of production is made by private corporations or individuals to whom wealth accrues since they own the means of production. Society morphed from the feudal system to a bourgeois one that did not eliminate class antagonisms (Marx and Engels para 8). Instead, “it has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx and Engels para 9). At best, the capitalist society that emerged in place of the feudal system merely served to abridge class antagonism by erasing multiple hierarchical classes and replacing them with two classes, the proletariats and the bourgeoisie (Marx and Engels para 10). The bourgeoisie refers to the wealthy class who own the means of production and can, therefore, accumulate incremental wealth by subjecting the proletariat into endless labor. On their part, the proletariat does not own the means of production and are forced to sell their labor cheaply to earn a living, ultimately sustaining the capitalist machinery.
Socialism and Free Market Capitalism are two very different economic schools of thoughts. The biggest disagreement between these two schools is economic equality and the role of the government. Socialisms’ originated as a social organization based on the holding of most property in common, with actual ownership given to the workers and their main principle is equality. In contrast, free market capitalism is a theory based around a free market and privatization in which ownership is given to the individual people and their main principle is individual rights.
Socialism allows the government to regulate all aspects of production, sales, and wages. Socialism is used to benefit the people as a whole, not as individuals. Economic equalization eliminates income inequality by lessening income extremes by creating a collective mentality among the people. Implementing socialism protects the middle and lower classes from poverty and prevents the wealthy from accruing too much power by creating shared responsibilities, social programs, and incomes; its unseen flaw is limiting the aspirations of society (Socialism UXL). In a traditional capitalist economy, wealthy elites hold political power; the elimination of economic elitists voids political elitists. Opposers argue that socialism isn’t fair. Wealth is equally distributed among the people due to government interference, despite the amount of work or career aptitude. Unlike capitalism, motivation is not a factor when there is not a direct relationship between work and outcome. Consequently, socialism clashes with natural human behavior. The lack of incentives leads to _______. Socialism is an ideology that fails through
Accordingly, one idea or fact that is often raised to differentiate socialism from communism is that socialism in general is the political movement that refers to an economic system in that they believe that the state should be in charge of all important producing industries thus taking hold of the control of free market in order to promote economic parity and egalitarianism. Theoretically, socialism seeks to distribute wealth equally among its citizens in a way that the rich don’t take
In Young’s “Five Faces of Oppression,” she describes that oppressed people cannot express their own needs, thoughts, and capacities in the same way as non-oppressed people. She puts forth five categories of oppression, including exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence, which serve to engender and maintain oppressive forces. Young also describes how oppression is deeply embedded into the norms and rules of our society, which is related to “The Cycle of Socialization” article by Harro, which describes how humans are socialized from birth based on their social identities. Based on these messages and the systems in place to maintain oppression, oppression is not only systemic and structural, but also very individualistic and personal.
A Capitalist Economy vs Socialist Economy There are a variety of economic systems today, which can influence how prosperous we will be as individuals or as a group. Socialism is an economic system where the government will be greatly involved in the economy. In a socialist economy the government can control many industries, provide public institutions such as health care and education, and equalize incomes of the population. A socialist economy is one of low unemployment and stability, where the government sets production quotas and price regulation upon their perception of the needs of the economy.
Capitalism is the more morally adequate system because it values the individual liberties of each man above the power of a centralized government. In theory, Capitalism is the ideal economic situation because it enables, as Smith argued, the competitive free market to keep one another in check and gradually increase the standard of living. It is under capitalism, that true social justice is achieved, where individuals are rewarded based upon their labor, while it is socialism which suppresses the potential of individuals. Theoretically, Capitalism gives more power to the individual and enables individuals, not necessarily grants, but enables all individuals the pursuit of happiness. It is far more preferred to live a life of poverty and hold sovereignty, than a life of wealth, but as a
Socialism and capitalism are two very different economic/industrious systems but, in some ways, they share a few similarities and that is what this essay will be discussing. The comparison between the two systems and their advantages and disadvantages for those who live in such societies. Socialism and capitalism are marginally contradicting scenarios offering advantages and disadvantages in the world of production and financial assistance.
Socialism is the underlying motivation behind communist movements in history. Socialists believe that it is unjust for a small amount of people to own the biggest portion of the wealth in society. This idea lead to the concept of a communist society, in which the existence of private property is eliminated in favor of government-owned property being shared among all it’s people. The government would provide jobs and care for all people equally. The idea was that through communism, there would be no social classes, thus eliminating alienation for any of the people in the society.
In seeking to highlight the key differences between socialism and capitalism, it would be prudent to first offer a concise definition of the two terms. Capitalism in the words of Brinkerhoff, White, Ortega, and Weitz (2007) "is the economic system in which most wealth (land, capital, and labor) is private property, to be used by its owners to maximize their own gain." As the authors in this case further point out, this particular economic system is largely founded on competition. Socialism on the other hand is defined as "an economic structure in which productive tools are owned and managed by the workers and used for the collective good" (Brinkerhoff et al., 2007). From the definitions, it is clear that unlike capitalism, socialism favors a situation whereby there is deliberate control as well as planning of economic activities on behalf of the entire community. In the case of capitalism, no attempt is made to have economic activities controlled from a central point on behalf of the community. Here, enterprises are allowed to compete in the supply of goods and services as they seek to rake in monetary returns. The key